Literature DB >> 26646414

Design of a haptic device with grasp and push-pull force feedback for a master-slave surgical robot.

Zhenkai Hu1, Chae-Hyun Yoon1, Samuel Byeongjun Park1, Yung-Ho Jo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We propose a portable haptic device providing grasp (kinesthetic) and push-pull (cutaneous) sensations for optical-motion-capture master interfaces.
METHODS: Although optical-motion-capture master interfaces for surgical robot systems can overcome the stiffness, friction, and coupling problems of mechanical master interfaces, it is difficult to add haptic feedback to an optical-motion-capture master interface without constraining the free motion of the operator's hands. Therefore, we utilized a Bowden cable-driven mechanism to provide the grasp and push-pull sensation while retaining the free hand motion of the optical-motion capture master interface. To evaluate the haptic device, we construct a 2-DOF force sensing/force feedback system. We compare the sensed force and the reproduced force of the haptic device. Finally, a needle insertion test was done to evaluate the performance of the haptic interface in the master-slave system.
RESULTS: The results demonstrate that both the grasp force feedback and the push-pull force feedback provided by the haptic interface closely matched with the sensed forces of the slave robot. We successfully apply our haptic interface in the optical-motion-capture master-slave system. The results of the needle insertion test showed that our haptic feedback can provide more safety than merely visual observation.
CONCLUSIONS: We develop a suitable haptic device to produce both kinesthetic grasp force feedback and cutaneous push-pull force feedback. Our future research will include further objective performance evaluations of the optical-motion-capture master-slave robot system with our haptic interface in surgical scenarios.

Keywords:  Cutaneous force feedback; Haptic interface; Kinesthetic force feedback; Master–slave surgical robot; Optical-motion-capture master

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26646414     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1324-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  13 in total

1.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future.

Authors:  David B Camarillo; Thomas M Krummel; J Kenneth Salisbury
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  A haptic pedal for surgery assistance.

Authors:  Iñaki Díaz; Jorge Juan Gil; Marcos Louredo
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 4.  Emergence of robotic assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: American perspective.

Authors:  Alberto Mendivil; Robert W Holloway; John F Boggess
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Review on aspects of artificial tactile feedback in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Sebastian Schostek; Marc O Schurr; Gerhard F Buess
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Sensory subtraction in robot-assisted surgery: fingertip skin deformation feedback to ensure safety and improve transparency in bimanual haptic interaction.

Authors:  Leonardo Meli; Claudio Pacchierotti; Domenico Prattichizzo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Cutaneous Force Feedback as a Sensory Subtraction Technique in Haptics.

Authors:  D Prattichizzo; C Pacchierotti; G Rosati
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  Parent and patient perceptions of robotic vs open urological surgery scars in children.

Authors:  Joao A B A Barbosa; Ghassan Barayan; Chad M Gridley; Daniela C J Sanchez; Carlo C Passerotti; Constance S Houck; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Optimization of a pneumatic balloon tactile display for robot-assisted surgery based on human perception.

Authors:  Chih-Hung King; Martin O Culjat; Miguel L Franco; James W Bisley; Erik Dutson; Warren S Grundfest
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  A remote palpation instrument for laparoscopic surgery: design and performance.

Authors:  Maria V Ottermo; Øyvind Stavdahl; Tor A Johansen
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.442

View more
  3 in total

1.  Study of the Operational Safety of a Vascular Interventional Surgical Robotic System.

Authors:  Jian Guo; Xiaoliang Jin; Shuxiang Guo
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  A Human Gesture Mapping Method to Control a Multi-Functional Hand for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: The MUSHA Case.

Authors:  Fanny Ficuciello; Alberto Villani; Tommaso Lisini Baldi; Domenico Prattichizzo
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-12-10

3.  Pneumatically driven surgical forceps displaying a magnified grasping torque.

Authors:  Takuya Iwai; Takahiro Kanno; Tetsuro Miyazaki; Daisuke Haraguchi; Kenji Kawashima
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2020-01-05       Impact factor: 2.547

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.