OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the combination of b-values and signal averages for diffusion-weighted image acquisitions that render the minimum acquisition time necessary to obtain values of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model parameters in vivo in the pancreas or liver with acceptable reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 16 volunteers, diffusion-weighted images, with 14 b-values and 9 acquisitions per b-value, were acquired in 2 scan sessions. The IVIM model was fitted to data from lesion-sized regions of interest (ROIs) (1.7 cm(3)) as well as organ-sized ROIs in the pancreas and liver. By deleting data during analyzes, the IVIM model parameters, D and f, could be determined as a function of the number of b-values as well as the number of measurements per b-value taken along. For the IVIM model parameters, we examined the behavior reproducibility, in the form of the within-subject coefficient of variation (CVw), as a function of the amount of data taken along in the fits. Finally, we determined the minimum acquisition time required as a function of CVw. RESULT: For the lesion-sized ROI, the intersession CVws were 8%/46% and 13%/55% for D/f in the pancreas and liver, respectively, when all data were taken along. For 1.2 times larger CVws, acquisition in the pancreas could be done in 5:15 minutes using 9 acquisitions per b-value at b = 0, 30, 50, 65, 100, 375, and 500 mm(-2)s and for the liver in 2:15 using 9 acquisitions per b-value at b = 0, 40, and 500 mm(-2)s. CONCLUSIONS: Acquiring 7 b-values in the pancreas and 3 b-values in the liver only decreases the reproducibility by 20% compared with an acquisition with 14 b-values. The understanding of the behavior of reproducibility as a function of b-values and acquisitions per b-values scanned will help researchers select the shortest IVIM protocol.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the combination of b-values and signal averages for diffusion-weighted image acquisitions that render the minimum acquisition time necessary to obtain values of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model parameters in vivo in the pancreas or liver with acceptable reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 16 volunteers, diffusion-weighted images, with 14 b-values and 9 acquisitions per b-value, were acquired in 2 scan sessions. The IVIM model was fitted to data from lesion-sized regions of interest (ROIs) (1.7 cm(3)) as well as organ-sized ROIs in the pancreas and liver. By deleting data during analyzes, the IVIM model parameters, D and f, could be determined as a function of the number of b-values as well as the number of measurements per b-value taken along. For the IVIM model parameters, we examined the behavior reproducibility, in the form of the within-subject coefficient of variation (CVw), as a function of the amount of data taken along in the fits. Finally, we determined the minimum acquisition time required as a function of CVw. RESULT: For the lesion-sized ROI, the intersession CVws were 8%/46% and 13%/55% for D/f in the pancreas and liver, respectively, when all data were taken along. For 1.2 times larger CVws, acquisition in the pancreas could be done in 5:15 minutes using 9 acquisitions per b-value at b = 0, 30, 50, 65, 100, 375, and 500 mm(-2)s and for the liver in 2:15 using 9 acquisitions per b-value at b = 0, 40, and 500 mm(-2)s. CONCLUSIONS: Acquiring 7 b-values in the pancreas and 3 b-values in the liver only decreases the reproducibility by 20% compared with an acquisition with 14 b-values. The understanding of the behavior of reproducibility as a function of b-values and acquisitions per b-values scanned will help researchers select the shortest IVIM protocol.
Authors: Jana Taron; Petros Martirosian; Thomas Kuestner; Nina F Schwenzer; Ahmed Othman; Jakob Weiß; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christina Schraml Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Eddie Surer; Cristina Rossi; Anton S Becker; Tim Finkenstaedt; Moritz C Wurnig; Antonios Valavanis; Sebastian Winklhofer Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Oliver J Gurney-Champion; David J Collins; Andreas Wetscherek; Mihaela Rata; Remy Klaassen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Kevin J Harrington; Uwe Oelfke; Matthew R Orton Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Remy Klaassen; Martijn Froeling; Sebastiano Barbieri; Jaap Stoker; Marc R W Engelbrecht; Johanna W Wilmink; Marc G Besselink; Arjan Bel; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Aart J Nederveen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Remy Klaassen; Anne Steins; Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Maarten F Bijlsma; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Marc R W Engelbrecht; Casper H J van Eijck; Mustafa Suker; Johanna W Wilmink; Marc G Besselink; Olivier R Busch; Onno J de Boer; Marc J van de Vijver; Gerrit K J Hooijer; Joanne Verheij; Jaap Stoker; Aart J Nederveen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Susanne S Rauh; Kevin Harrington; Uwe Oelfke; Frederik B Laun; Andreas Wetscherek Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Nienke D Sijtsema; Steven F Petit; Dirk H J Poot; Gerda M Verduijn; Aad van der Lugt; Mischa S Hoogeman; Juan A Hernandez-Tamames Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 4.668