Literature DB >> 26645378

Alternative peripheral perfusion strategies for safe cardiopulmonary bypass in atrial septal defect closure via a right minithoracotomy approach.

Hiroto Kitahara1, Kazuma Okamoto2, Mikihiko Kudo1, Akihiro Yoshitake1, Takahito Ito1, Kanako Hayashi1, Yu Inaba1, Yuta Akamatsu1, Hideyuki Shimizu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In cases of cardiac surgery via a minimally invasive right minithoracotomy approach, cardiopulmonary bypass is established with peripheral arterial cannulation, frequently with a single femoral artery. Occasionally, alternative perfusion access is required to prevent perfusion site-related complications. In this study, the feasibility of alternative perfusion strategies was verified by comparing the postoperative outcomes and complications.
METHODS: The records of 91 consecutive patients (68 women, 23 men; mean age 40.7 ± 16.5 years) who underwent atrial septal defect (ASD) closure via a right minithoracotomy approach between January 2009 and September 2014 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: those with single femoral arterial access (SF group, n = 84), and those with alternative perfusion access (ALT group, n = 7, bilateral femoral arterial cannulation in 6, side-arm graft anastomosed to the femoral artery in 1).
RESULTS: Femoral artery diameter was smaller in the ALT group than in the SF group (6.5 ± 0.5 vs. 7.3 ± 1.0 mm, P = 0.013). Operating time was longer in the ALT group than in the SF group (259.2 ± 54.0 vs. 208.3 ± 54.9 min, P = 0.031). One patient was converted to ascending aortic cannulation owing to high perfusion pressure. Postoperative major cardiac or cerebrovascular events, such as death, stroke, or myocardial infarction, did not occur in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Alternative perfusion access was safe in ASD closure via a right minithoracotomy approach. Precise preoperative evaluation of the iliofemoral artery is important for choosing the appropriate perfusion strategy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiopulmonary bypass; Congenital heart disease; Minimally invasive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645378     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-015-0611-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  26 in total

1.  Enhancing departmental quality control in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Michele Murzi; Alfredo G Cerillo; Stefano Bevilacqua; Tommaso Gasbarri; Enkel Kallushi; Pierandrea Farneti; Marco Solinas; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Minimally invasive valve surgery with antegrade perfusion strategy is not associated with increased neurologic complications.

Authors:  Eugene A Grossi; Didier F Loulmet; Charles F Schwartz; Brian Solomon; Sophia L Dellis; Alfred T Culliford; Elias Zias; Aubrey C Galloway
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Technical problems and complications of axillary artery cannulation.

Authors:  Thomas Schachner; Johann Nagiller; Anne Zimmer; Guenther Laufer; Johannes Bonatti
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Aortic cannulation system for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Cristina Barbero; Davide Ricci; Suad El Qarra; Giovanni Marchetto; Massimo Boffini; Mauro Rinaldi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Femoral cannulation: a safe vascular access option for cardiopulmonary bypass in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Siavash Saadat; Molly Schultheis; Anthony Azzolini; Joseph Romero; Victor Dombrovskiy; Karen Odroniec; Peter Scholz; Anthony Lemaire; George Batsides; Leonard Lee
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Preoperative vascular imaging for predicting intraoperative modification of peripheral arterial cannulation during minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Cristian Rosu; Denis Bouchard; Michel Pellerin; Jean-Sebastien Lebon; Hugues Jeanmart
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

7.  Predictors of Atrial Septal Defect Occluder Dislodgement.

Authors:  Wei-Chieh Lee; Chih-Yuan Fang; Chien-Fu Huang; Ying-Jui Lin; Chiung-Jen Wu; Hsiu-Yu Fang
Journal:  Int Heart J       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing minimally invasive versus median sternotomy valve surgery.

Authors:  Christos G Mihos; Orlando Santana; Gervasio A Lamas; Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Antegrade and retrograde arterial perfusion strategy in minimally invasive mitral-valve surgery: a propensity score analysis on 1280 patients.

Authors:  Michele Murzi; Alfredo G Cerillo; Antonio Miceli; Stefano Bevilacqua; Enkel Kallushi; Pierandrea Farneti; Marco Solinas; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  First Comprehensive Analysis of Outcomes in Adult Patients after Percutaneous Closure of Isolated Secundum Atrial Septal Defects.

Authors:  Armita Atashband; Nasser Lakkis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem       Date:  2015
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Japan: history and current status.

Authors:  Kazuma Okamoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-07-17

Review 2.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through a right mini-thoracotomy.

Authors:  Taichi Sakaguchi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-09-16

3.  Mini-thoracotomy versus median sternotomy for atrial septal defect closure: Should mini-thoracotomy be applied as a standard technique?

Authors:  Yüksel Beşir; Orhan Gökalp; Ertürk Karaağaç; Börteçin Eygi; Hasan İner; Nihan Yeşilkaya; İhsan Peker; Levent Yılık; Ali Gürbüz
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 0.332

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.