Ryo Itabashi1, Yoshiyuki Nishio1, Yuka Kataoka2, Yukako Yazawa2, Eisuke Furui2, Minoru Matsuda2, Etsuro Mori2. 1. From the Departments of Stroke Neurology (R.I., Y.Y., E.F.) and Rehabilitation Medicine (Y.K.), Kohnan Hospital, Sendai, Japan; and Department of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan (R.I., Y.N., M.M., E.M.). ritabash@kohnan-sendai.or.jp nishiou@med.tohoku.ac.jp. 2. From the Departments of Stroke Neurology (R.I., Y.Y., E.F.) and Rehabilitation Medicine (Y.K.), Kohnan Hospital, Sendai, Japan; and Department of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan (R.I., Y.N., M.M., E.M.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder, which is clinically characterized by the combination of phonemic segmental changes and articulatory distortions. AOS has been believed to arise from impairment in motor speech planning/programming and differentiated from both aphasia and dysarthria. The brain regions associated with AOS are still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to address this issue in a large number of consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 136 patients with isolated nonlacunar infarcts in the left middle cerebral artery territory (70.5±12.9 years old, 79 males). In accordance with speech and language assessments, the patients were classified into the following groups: pure form of AOS (pure AOS), AOS with aphasia (AOS-aphasia), and without AOS (non-AOS). Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping analysis was performed on T2-weighted images or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. Using the Liebermeister method, group-wise comparisons were made between the all AOS (pure AOS plus AOS-aphasia) and non-AOS, pure AOS and non-AOS, AOS-aphasia and non-AOS, and pure AOS and AOS-aphasia groups. RESULTS: Of the 136 patients, 22 patients were diagnosed with AOS (7 patients with pure AOS and 15 patients with AOS-aphasia). The voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping analysis demonstrated that the brain regions associated with AOS were centered on the left precentral gyrus. CONCLUSIONS: Damage to the left precentral gyrus is associated with AOS in acute to subacute stroke patients, suggesting a role of this brain region in motor speech production.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder, which is clinically characterized by the combination of phonemic segmental changes and articulatory distortions. AOS has been believed to arise from impairment in motor speech planning/programming and differentiated from both aphasia and dysarthria. The brain regions associated with AOS are still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to address this issue in a large number of consecutive acute ischemic strokepatients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 136 patients with isolated nonlacunar infarcts in the left middle cerebral artery territory (70.5±12.9 years old, 79 males). In accordance with speech and language assessments, the patients were classified into the following groups: pure form of AOS (pure AOS), AOS with aphasia (AOS-aphasia), and without AOS (non-AOS). Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping analysis was performed on T2-weighted images or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. Using the Liebermeister method, group-wise comparisons were made between the all AOS (pure AOS plus AOS-aphasia) and non-AOS, pure AOS and non-AOS, AOS-aphasia and non-AOS, and pure AOS and AOS-aphasia groups. RESULTS: Of the 136 patients, 22 patients were diagnosed with AOS (7 patients with pure AOS and 15 patients with AOS-aphasia). The voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping analysis demonstrated that the brain regions associated with AOS were centered on the left precentral gyrus. CONCLUSIONS: Damage to the left precentral gyrus is associated with AOS in acute to subacute strokepatients, suggesting a role of this brain region in motor speech production.
Authors: Rene L Utianski; Jennifer L Whitwell; Christopher G Schwarz; Matthew L Senjem; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Joseph R Duffy; Heather M Clark; Mary M Machulda; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Keith A Josephs Journal: Cortex Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: Alexandra Basilakos; Kimberly G Smith; Paul Fillmore; Julius Fridriksson; Evelina Fedorenko Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Alexandra Basilakos; Julius Fridriksson; Chris Rorden; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Taylor Hanayik; Thomas Naselaris; John Del Gaizo; Jesse Breedlove; W A Vandergrift; Leonardo Bonilha Journal: Brain Lang Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Daniel Mirman; Amanda E Kraft; Denise Y Harvey; Adelyn R Brecher; Myrna F Schwartz Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: R L Utianski; J L Whitwell; C G Schwarz; J R Duffy; H Botha; H M Clark; M M Machulda; M L Senjem; D S Knopman; R C Petersen; C R Jack; V J Lowe; K A Josephs Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 6.089