| Literature DB >> 26645150 |
Ji-Shun Zheng1, Meng-Meng Chen2, Hai-Fei Yang2, Xiang-Tian Zhou2, Yan-Yan Liu2, Jia-Bin Li3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) liver function in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are significantly associated. A comparison of clinical significance of fecal HBV DNA and serum HBV DNA has not yet been reported. MATERIAL AND METHODS Stool and serum samples were collected from 66 patients with CHB. Fecal HBV DNA, serum HBV DNA, and intestinal microbiota DNA were detected by real-time quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Liver function and HBeAg were analyzed. RESULTS The stool and serum HBV DNA were positively correlated (r=0.57, P=0.001). Fecal HBV DNA was higher in the HBeAg-positive group than in the HBeAg-negative group (P=0.02). Fecal HBV DNA was negatively correlated with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (r=-0.41, P=0.001) and TBIL (r=-0.29, P=0.02), and was positively correlated with Enterococcus (r=0.38, P=0.002). Serum HBV DNA was negatively correlated with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (r=-0.30,P=0.02), aminotransferase (AST) (r=-0.26, P=0.049), and Lactobacillus (r=-0.31, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS These observations suggest that fecal HBV DNA and serum HBV DNA in patients with CHB have different effects. Fecal HBV DNA might be associated with changes in Enterococcus concentrations, but serum HBV DNA is not.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26645150 PMCID: PMC4677737 DOI: 10.12659/msm.896243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
The clinical data of the patients with CHB (χ̄± s).
| Items | Chronic hepatits B |
|---|---|
| No. of subjects (n) | 66 |
| Gender (male/female) | 46/20 |
| Age (year) | 42.5±20.70 |
| Stool wet weight (mg) | 200±5.61 |
| TBIL (μmol/L) | 44.20±41.66 |
| ALT (U/L) | 695.61±658.86 |
| AST (U/L) | 518.60±640.18 |
| ALB (g/L) | 39.7±4.42 |
| GGT(U/L) | 130.88±77.45 |
| ALP (IU/L) | 113.14±59.81 |
| Log of stool HBV DNA | 5.88±1.63 |
| Log of serum HBV DNA | 6.05±1.07 |
| 8.38±1.04 | |
| 6.94±1.00 | |
| 7.74±1.15 | |
| 7.22±1.65 | |
| 6.34±0.35 |
Primers and conditions used for qualitative and quantitative PCR.
| Target group | Sequence(5-3′) | Amplicon size (bp) | Annealing temp (°C) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F: CATTGACGTTACCCGCGAGAAGAAGC | 195 | 55 | [ | |
| R: CTCTACGAGCTCAAGCTTGC | ||||
| F: CCCTTATTGTTAGTTGCCATCATT | 144 | 54 | [ | |
| R: ACTCGTTGTACTTCCCATTGT | ||||
| F: CTCCTGGAAACGGGTGG | 550 | 52 | [ | |
| R: GGTGTTCTTCCCGATATCTAC | ||||
| F: AGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCA | 341 | 52 | [ | |
| R: CACCGCTACACATGGAG | ||||
| F: TTTATCAACTTGTCACACCAGA | 273 | 50 | [ | |
| R: ATCCCGCCTTACCACTACCG |
Figure 1The correlation between fecal HBV DNA and serum HBV DNA. Notes: The Log of fecal HBV DNA was 5.88±1.63. The Log of serum HBV DNA was 6.05±1.07. The copy numbers of HBV DNA from the two types of samples were positively correlated (r=0.57, P=0.001), correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The difference of HBV DNA between the HBeAg-positive group and the HBeAg-negative group.
| Items | HBeAg-positive group | HbeAg-negative group |
|---|---|---|
| Log of fecal HBV DNA | 6.27±1.70 | 5.45±1.44 |
In Independent samples test,
P=0.02<0.05.
The correlation between HBV DNA and liver function (n=66).
| Items | Log of fecal HBV DNA | Log of serum HBV DNA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | r | p | |
| ALT | −0.07 | 0.58 | −0.30 | 0.02 |
| AST | −0.05 | 0.68 | −0.26 | 0.049 |
| ALB | 0.03 | 0.80 | 0.09 | 0.46 |
| GGT | −0.20 | 0.11 | −0.11 | 0.39 |
| ALP | −0.41 | 0.001 | −0.02 | 0.89 |
| TBIL | −0.29 | 0.02 | −0.19 | 0.13 |
In Pearson’s correlation analyses,
P<0.05;
P<0.01.
The correlation between HBV DNA and intestinal microbiota (n=66).
| Items | Fecal HBV DNA | Serum HBV DNA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | r | p | |
| 0.08 | 0.50 | −0.13 | 0.29 | |
| 0.38 | 0.002 | −0.01 | 0.93 | |
| 0.16 | 0.21 | −0.09 | 0.46 | |
| 0.19 | 0.13 | −0.31 | 0.01 | |
| 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.53 | |
In Pearson’s correlation analyses,
P<0.05,
P<0.01.