| Literature DB >> 26644928 |
S Chowdhury1, A Maniar1, O M Suganya1.
Abstract
In this study, Wood Ash (WA) prepared from the uncontrolled burning of the saw dust is evaluated for its suitability as partial cement replacement in conventional concrete. The saw dust has been acquired from a wood polishing unit. The physical, chemical and mineralogical characteristics of WA is presented and analyzed. The strength parameters (compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength) of concrete with blended WA cement are evaluated and studied. Two different water-to-binder ratio (0.4 and 0.45) and five different replacement percentages of WA (5%, 10%, 15%, 18% and 20%) including control specimens for both water-to-cement ratio is considered. Results of compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength showed that the strength properties of concrete mixture decreased marginally with increase in wood ash contents, but strength increased with later age. The XRD test results and chemical analysis of WA showed that it contains amorphous silica and thus can be used as cement replacing material. Through the analysis of results obtained in this study, it was concluded that WA could be blended with cement without adversely affecting the strength properties of concrete. Also using a new statistical theory of the Support Vector Machine (SVM), strength parameters were predicted by developing a suitable model and as a result, the application of soft computing in structural engineering has been successfully presented in this research paper.Entities:
Keywords: Cement replacement; Compressive strength; SVM; Wood ash; XRD
Year: 2014 PMID: 26644928 PMCID: PMC4642169 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2014.08.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
The chemical analysis and physical properties of the cement.
| Particular | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SiO2 (%) | 20.25 |
| 2 | Al2O3 (%) | 5.04 |
| 3 | Fe2O3 (%) | 3.16 |
| 4 | CaO (%) | 63.61 |
| 5 | MgO (%) | 4.56 |
| 6 | Na2O (%) | 0.08 |
| 7 | K2O (%) | 0.5 |
| 8 | Loss on ignition | 3.12 |
| 1 | Specific gravity | 3.1 |
| 2 | Mean size | 23 μm |
Grading and properties of fine aggregate.
| Sieve size (mm) | Percentage passing | Limits of specifications ASTM C33/C33M-08 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 | 100 | 100 |
| 4.75 | 98 | 95–100 |
| 2.36 | 92 | 80–100 |
| 1.18 | 84 | 50–85 |
| 0.60 | 57 | 25–60 |
| 0.30 | 23 | 5–30 |
| 0.15 | 3 | 0–10 |
| Property | Result | |
| Bulk specific gravity | 2.62 | |
| Absorption (%) | 0.70 |
The chemical analysis and physical properties of the WA.
| Particular | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SiO2 (%) | 65.3 |
| 2 | Al2O3 (%) | 4.25 |
| 3 | Fe2O3 (%) | 2.24 |
| 4 | CaO (%) | 9.98 |
| 5 | MgO (%) | 5.32 |
| 6 | Na2O (%) | 2.6 |
| 7 | K2O (%) | 1.9 |
| 8 | Loss on ignition (%) | 4.67 |
| 1 | Specific gravity | 2.16 |
| 2 | Mean size | 170 μm |
| 3 | Bulk density | 720 kg/m3 |
Properties of different types of pozzolans as defined by ASTM C618 [27].
| Properties | Class N type pozzolan | Class F type pozzolan | Class C type pozzolan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Min. SiO2 + Al2O3 + Fe2O (%) | 70.0 | 70.0 | 50.0 |
| Max. Sulfur trioxide (SO3) (%) | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max. Na2O + 0.658 K2O | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max. loss on ignition | 10.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Test results.
| Water to binder ratio | Replacement percentage (%) | Compressive strength (N/mm2) | Split tensile strength (N/mm2) | Flexural strength (N/mm2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 day | 28 day | 7 day | 28 day | 7 day | 28 day | ||
| 0.40 | 0 | 35.7 | 36.8 | 2.78 | 3.51 | 5.40 | 5.77 |
| 5 | 34.1 | 35.3 | 2.61 | 2.90 | 5.29 | 5.63 | |
| 10 | 33.9 | 36.5 | 2.53 | 2.81 | 5.17 | 5.39 | |
| 15 | 32.7 | 34.8 | 2.39 | 2.73 | 5.03 | 5.25 | |
| 18 | 33.1 | 32.3 | 2.48 | 2.79 | 4.91 | 5.08 | |
| 20 | 30.4 | 31.7 | 2.21 | 2.53 | 4.82 | 4.97 | |
| 0.45 | 0 | 33.0 | 34.2 | 2.50 | 3.30 | 5.10 | 5.52 |
| 5 | 31.1 | 33.3 | 2.47 | 3.24 | 5.08 | 5.46 | |
| 10 | 30.7 | 32.7 | 2.39 | 3.16 | 4.93 | 5.41 | |
| 15 | 32.3 | 35.4 | 2.27 | 3.04 | 4.87 | 5.29 | |
| 18 | 30.1 | 32.6 | 2.09 | 2.89 | 4.84 | 5.17 | |
| 20 | 27.7 | 29.0 | 2.1 | 2.67 | 4.77 | 4.91 | |
R values for training and testing.
| Output | Training performance ( | Testing performance ( |
|---|---|---|
| Compressive strength | 0.979 | 0.957 |
| Split tensile strength | 0.981 | 0.964 |
| Flexural strength | 0.984 | 0.978 |
Fig. 1The XRD result of WA.
Results of SVM prediction.
| Water to cement ratio | Replacement percentage | Compressive strength (N/mm2) | Split tensile strength (N/mm2) | Flexural strength (N/mm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 days | 28 days | 28 days | ||
| 0.4 | 6 | 36.845 | 3.5028 | 6.4531 |
| 16 | 34.1093 | 2.7913 | 5.9618 | |
| 19 | 32.345 | 2.76 | 5.8206 | |
| 0.45 | 6 | 34.155 | 3.2928 | 6.2902 |
| 16 | 32.5404 | 2.8335 | 5.9811 | |
| 19 | 32.555 | 2.8828 | 5.7714 | |
Fig. 2Strength parameters at 28 days for 0.4 water–binder ratio.
Fig. 3Strength parameters at 28 days for 0.45 water–binder ratio.