Literature DB >> 26644264

Clinicopathologic implications of DNA mismatch repair status in endometrial carcinomas.

Ayumi Shikama1, Takeo Minaguchi2, Koji Matsumoto1, Azusa Akiyama-Abe1, Yuko Nakamura1, Hiroo Michikami1, Sari Nakao1, Manabu Sakurai1, Hiroyuki Ochi1, Mamiko Onuki1, Toyomi Satoh1, Akinori Oki1, Hiroyuki Yoshikawa1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endometrial carcinoma is the most common malignancy in women with Lynch syndrome caused by mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency. We investigated the clinicopathologic significance of deficient MMR and Lynch syndrome presumed by MMR analyses in unselected endometrial carcinomas.
METHODS: We analyzed immunohistochemistry of MMR proteins (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) and MLH1 promoter methylation in primary endometrial carcinomas from 221 consecutive patients. Based on these results, tumors were categorized as sporadic or probable Lynch syndrome (PLS). Clinicopathologic variables and prognosis were compared according to MMR status and sporadic/PLS classification.
RESULTS: Deficient MMR showed only trends towards favorable overall survival (OS) compared with intact MMR (p=0.13), whereas PLS showed significantly better OS than sporadic (p=0.038). Sporadic was significantly associated with older age, obesity, deep myometrial invasion, and advanced stage (p=0.008, 0.01, 0.02 and 0.03), while PLS was significantly associated with early stage and Lynch syndrome-associated multiple cancer (p=0.04 and 0.001). The trend towards favorable OS of PLS was stronger in advanced stage than in early stage (hazard ratio, 0.044 [95% CI 0-25.6] vs. 0.49 [0.063-3.8]). In the subset receiving adjuvant therapies, PLS showed trends towards favorable disease-free survival compared to sporadic by contrast with patients receiving no adjuvant therapies showing no such trend (hazard ratio, 0.045 [95% CI 0-20.3] vs. 0.81 [0.095-7.0]).
CONCLUSIONS: The current findings suggest that analyzing MMR status and searching for Lynch syndrome may identify a subset of patients with favorable survival and high sensitivity to adjuvant therapies, providing novel and useful implications for formulating the precision medicine in endometrial carcinoma.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial carcinoma; Lynch syndrome; MLH1 promoter methylation; Mismatch repair deficiency; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26644264     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  20 in total

1.  Clinicopathologic Significance of Mismatch Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  D Scott McMeekin; David L Tritchler; David E Cohn; David G Mutch; Heather A Lankes; Melissa A Geller; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Lisa M Landrum; Richard Zaino; Russell D Broaddus; Nilsa Ramirez; Feng Gao; Shamshad Ali; Kathleen M Darcy; Michael L Pearl; Paul A DiSilvestro; Shashikant B Lele; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Less correlation between mismatch repair proteins deficiency and decreased expression of HLA class I molecules in endometrial carcinoma: a different propensity from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tasuku Mariya; Terufumi Kubo; Yoshihiko Hirohashi; Junko Yanagawa; Yuta Tabuchi; Kazuhiko Matsuo; Kiyoshi Furumura; Rena Morita; Munehide Nakatsugawa; Takayuki Kanaseki; Tomohide Tsukahara; Tadashi Hasegawa; Tsuyoshi Saito; Toshihiko Torigoe
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  Mismatch repair deficiency and clinicopathological characteristics in endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alaa Salah Jumaah; Hawraa Sahib Al-Haddad; Mais Muhammed Salem; Katherine Ann McAllister; Akeel Abed Yasseen
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 5.  New classification of endometrial cancers: the development and potential applications of genomic-based classification in research and clinical care.

Authors:  A Talhouk; J N McAlpine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Res Pract       Date:  2016-12-13

6.  p53 aberrations in low grade endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium with nodal metastases: possible insights on pathogenesis discerned from immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Vinita Parkash
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status.

Authors:  Penelope M Webb; Amanda B Spurdle; Christina M Nagle; Tracy A O'Mara; Yen Tan; Daniel D Buchanan; Andreas Obermair; Penny Blomfield; Michael A Quinn
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 8.  The practice of universal screening for Lynch syndrome in newly diagnosed endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Aifen Wang; Jenna McCracken; Yanjing Li; Lingfan Xu
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-14

9.  Mismatch repair deficiency and aberrations in the Notch and Hedgehog pathways are of prognostic value in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Genovefa Polychronidou; Vassiliki Kotoula; Kyriaki Manousou; Ioannis Kostopoulos; Georgia Karayannopoulou; Eleni Vrettou; Mattheos Bobos; Georgia Raptou; Ioannis Efstratiou; Dimitrios Dionysopoulos; Kyriakos Chatzopoulos; Sotirios Lakis; Sofia Chrisafi; Dimitrios Tsolakidis; Alexios Papanikolaou; Nikolaos Dombros; George Fountzilas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Annukka Pasanen; Mikko Loukovaara; Ralf Bützow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.