Literature DB >> 26644147

Radiation shielding in dentistry: an update.

G D Crane1, P V Abbott1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to review the literature and provide guidelines on the use of radiation protection for patients in the dental setting. There are limited published data on the effects of low radiation doses such as those used in dental radiology. Most of the evidence is subject to bias, with risk models extrapolated from higher dose models such as studies of the Hiroshima bomb survivors. However, the lack of evidence does not denote the absence of risk, as there is no established 'safe' level of radiation exposure. All imaging utilizing ionizing radiation carries a risk for the patient. Hence the patient benefits of imaging must outweigh the potential risk. All diagnostic imaging should adhere to three basic principles, these being justification, optimization and application of dose limits. This article discusses dose reduction techniques and shielding of sensitive organs, particularly the thyroid, during procedures such as intraoral imaging, orthopantomograms and imaging of the pregnant patient.
© 2015 Australian Dental Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental imaging; X-ray; radiation; shielding; thyroid

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26644147     DOI: 10.1111/adj.12389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Dent J        ISSN: 0045-0421            Impact factor:   2.291


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the radiation dose in the thyroid gland using different protective collars in panoramic imaging.

Authors:  Ladan Hafezi; S Marjan Arianezhad; Seyed Mahdi Hosseini Pooya
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Recommendations, Practices and Infrastructural Model for the Dental Radiology Set-up in Clinical and Academic Institutions in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Anu Sushanth A; Kumar Chandan Srivastava; Deepti Shrivastava; Hala A Hosni; Zafar Ali Khan; Khalid Al-Johani; Ibrahim A Alzoubi; Sasirekha B; Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen; Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  Kerma area product (KAP) and scatter measurements for intraoral X-ray machines using three different types of round collimation compared with rectangular beam limiter.

Authors:  Dennise Magill; Nhan James Huu Ngo; Marc A Felice; Mel Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Radiation Protection Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) in Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shabani; Hadi Hasanzadeh; Alireza Emadi; Majid Mirmohammadkhani; Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi; Ali Abedelahi; Mitra Bokharaeian; Hamed Masoumi; Danial Seifi; Tahereh Khani; Mohamad Sanchooli; Shima Moshfegh; Abbas Ziari
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2018-03

5.  Evaluating the X-ray-Shielding Performance of Graphene-Oxide-Coated Nanocomposite Fabric.

Authors:  Serhat Süha Türkaslan; Şule Sultan Ugur; Banu Esencan Türkaslan; Nicholas Fantuzzi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of Radiographic Protection by Dental Undergraduate and Endodontic Postgraduate Students, General Practitioners, and Endodontists.

Authors:  Amal A Almohaimede; Mohammad W Bendahmash; Feras M Dhafr; Abdullah F Awwad; Ebtissam M Al-Madi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-04-27

7.  Image quality of a portable X-ray device (Nomad Pro 2) compared to a wall-mounted device in intraoral radiography.

Authors:  Julia Nitschke; Lara Schorn; Henrik Holtmann; Uwe Zeller; Jörg Handschel; David Sonntag; Julian Lommen
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 1.852

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.