Literature DB >> 26643739

Comparison of Right and Left Upper Limb Arterial Variants in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Transradial Procedures.

Francesco Burzotta1, Marta Francesca Brancati2, Italo Porto2, Silvia Saffioti2, Cristina Aurigemma2, Giampaolo Niccoli2, Antonio Maria Leone2, Valentina Coluccia2, Filippo Crea2, Carlo Trani2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transradial approach (TRA), when compared with transfemoral, improves the safety of percutaneous coronary procedures. Arterial axis variants are known to hinder the performance of transradial approach percutaneous coronary procedures. Data on the occurrence of arterial axis variants in the right and left arm arterial axes of individual patients are lacking. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From a single-center prospective registry, we selected all patients in whom bilateral upper limb arterial anatomy was assessed based on the performance of left and right radial catheterization obtained during the same or during repeat coronary diagnostic or interventional procedure(s). The occurrence of upper right and left limb arterial axis variants was classified according to the previously described operative ABC classification. A total of 610 patients were identified. An ABC upper limb arterial axis variant was detected in 156 (25.6%) patients. Variants were right-sided only in 65 (11.0%), left-sided only in 40 (6.6%), and bilateral in 46 (7.5%) patients. Thus, arterial axis variants were significantly more common in the right side (P=0.02). Bilateral arterial variants were significantly associated with age, female sex, and valvulopathy. Both A (radial/brachial) and B (axillary/subclavian/innominate) variants exhibited concordance across the 2 sides (odds ratio, 7.2; 95% confidence interval, 4.1-12.7 and 8.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-30.9, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of an anatomic variant potentially hindering transradial approach coronary diagnostic or interventional procedures is bilateral in <8% of cases and is more common in the right arm. Such information may guide, during the clinical practice, the access selection in the case of repeat procedures or need for additional accesses.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  catheterization; coronary angiography; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26643739     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of right and left trans-radial catheterization for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with Acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Hongying Wang; Shijin Song
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  Left Distal Radial Artery Access Site in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is It Safe?

Authors:  Elton Soydan; Mustafa Akın
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.021

3.  Prevalence and predictors of difficult vascular anatomy in forearm artery access for coronary angiography and PCI.

Authors:  Tobias Roeschl; Anas M Jano; Franziska Fochler; Mona M Grewe; Marlis Wacker; Kirstin Meier; Christian Schmidt; Lars Maier; Peter H Grewe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.