Literature DB >> 26643553

Breaking the DNA damage response to improve cervical cancer treatment.

Hylke W Wieringa1, Ate G J van der Zee2, Elisabeth G E de Vries3, Marcel A T M van Vugt4.   

Abstract

Every year, cervical cancer affects ∼500,000 women worldwide, and ∼275,000 patients die of this disease. The addition of platin-based chemotherapy to primary radiotherapy has increased 5-year survival of advanced-stage cervical cancer patients, which is, however, still only 66%. One of the factors thought to contribute to treatment failure is the ability of tumor cells to repair chemoradiotherapy-induced DNA damage. Therefore, sensitization of tumor cells for chemoradiotherapy via inhibition of the DNA damage response (DDR) as a novel strategy to improve therapy effect, is currently studied pre-clinically as well as in the clinic. Almost invariably, cervical carcinogenesis involves infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV), which inactivates part of the DNA damage response. This HPV-mediated partial inactivation of the DDR presents therapeutic targeting of the residual DDR as an interesting approach to achieve chemoradio-sensitization for cervical cancer. How the DDR can be most efficiently targeted, however, remains unclear. The fact that cisplatin and radiotherapy activate multiple signaling axes within the DDR further complicates a rational choice of therapeutic targets within the DDR. In this review, we provide an overview of the current preclinical and clinical knowledge about targeting the DDR in cervical cancer.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Cisplatin; DDR-inhibitors; DNA damage response; Radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26643553     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  21 in total

Review 1.  Integration of microbiology, molecular pathology, and epidemiology: a new paradigm to explore the pathogenesis of microbiome-driven neoplasms.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Hamada; Jonathan A Nowak; Danny A Milner; Mingyang Song; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 7.996

2.  [Inhibiting HSP70 expression enhances cisplatin sensitivity of cervical cancer cells].

Authors:  Jian Liu; Jing Liu; Sheng-Ze Li; Ying-Ao Zheng; Su-Yang Guo; Xiu Wang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-04-20

Review 3.  Modulation of the DNA damage response during the life cycle of human papillomaviruses.

Authors:  Daniel C Anacker; Cary A Moody
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.303

4.  Ubiquitin-specific protease 7 sustains DNA damage response and promotes cervical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Dongxue Su; Shuai Ma; Lin Shan; Yue Wang; Yuejiao Wang; Cheng Cao; Beibei Liu; Chao Yang; Liyong Wang; Shanshan Tian; Xiang Ding; Xinhua Liu; Na Yu; Nan Song; Ling Liu; Shangda Yang; Qi Zhang; Fuquan Yang; Kai Zhang; Lei Shi
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Inherited alterations of TGF beta signaling components in Appalachian cervical cancers.

Authors:  Thomas J Knobloch; Juan Peng; Erinn M Hade; David E Cohn; Mack T Ruffin; Michael A Schiano; Byron C Calhoun; William C McBee; Jamie L Lesnock; Holly H Gallion; Jondavid Pollock; Bo Lu; Steve Oghumu; Zhaoxia Zhang; Marta T Sears; Blessing E Ogbemudia; Joseph T Perrault; Logan C Weghorst; Erin Strawser; Cecilia R DeGraffinreid; Electra D Paskett; Christopher M Weghorst
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Determining the Potential of DNA Damage Response (DDR) Inhibitors in Cervical Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Santu Saha; Stuart Rundle; Ioannis C Kotsopoulos; Jacob Begbie; Rachel Howarth; Isabel Y Pappworth; Asima Mukhopadhyay; Ali Kucukmetin; Kevin J Marchbank; Nicola Curtin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Dysregulation of hsa-miR-34a and hsa-miR-449a leads to overexpression of PACS-1 and loss of DNA damage response (DDR) in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mysore S Veena; Santanu Raychaudhuri; Saroj K Basak; Natarajan Venkatesan; Parameet Kumar; Roopa Biswas; Rita Chakrabarti; Jing Lu; Trent Su; Marcus Gallagher-Jones; Marco Morselli; Haiqing Fu; Matteo Pellegrini; Theodore Goldstein; Mirit I Aladjem; Matthew B Rettig; Sharon P Wilczynski; Daniel Sanghoon Shin; Eri S Srivatsan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Exploiting somatic alterations as therapeutic targets in advanced and metastatic cervical cancer.

Authors:  F J Crowley; R E O'Cearbhaill; D C Collins
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 13.608

Review 9.  Synthetic nanoparticles for delivery of radioisotopes and radiosensitizers in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jun Zhao; Min Zhou; Chun Li
Journal:  Cancer Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-11-16

10.  Effect of Ku80 on the radiosensitization of cisplatin in the cervical carcinoma cell line HeLa.

Authors:  Liang Zhuang; Fei Liu; Ping Peng; Huihua Xiong; Hong Qiu; Xiugen Fu; Zhiping Xiao; Xiaoyuan Huang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.