Literature DB >> 26643300

Symptomatic Perihepatic Fluid Collections After Hepatic Resection in the Modern Era.

Ioannis T Konstantinidis1, Pedro Mastrodomenico1, Constantinos T Sofocleous2, Karen T Brown2, George I Getrajdman2, Mithat Gönen3, Peter J Allen1, T Peter Kingham1, Ronald P DeMatteo1, Yuman Fong1, William R Jarnagin1, Michael I D'Angelica4,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improvements in liver surgery have led to decreased mortality rates. Symptomatic perihepatic collections (SPHCs) requiring percutaneous drainage remain a significant source of morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: A single institution's prospectively maintained hepatic resection database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent hepatectomy between January 2004 and February 2012.
RESULTS: Data from 2173 hepatectomies performed in 2040 patients were reviewed. Overall, 200 (9%) patients developed an SPHC, the majority non-bilious (75.5%) and infected (54%). Major hepatic resections, larger than median blood loss (≥360 ml), use of surgical drains, and simultaneous performance of a colorectal procedure were associated with an SPHC on multivariate analysis. Non-bilious, non-infected (NBNI) collections were associated with lower white blood cell (WBC) counts, absence of a bilio-enteric anastomosis, use of hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP), and presence of metastatic disease, and resolved more frequently with a single interventional radiology (IR) procedure (85 vs. 46.5%, p < 0.001) more quickly (15 vs. 30 days, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: SPHCs developed in 9% of patients in a modern series of hepatic resections, and in one third were non-bilious and non-infected. In the era of modern interventional radiology, the need for re-operation for SPHC is exceedingly rare. A significant proportion of minimally symptomatic SPHC patients may not require drainage, and strategies to avoid unnecessary drainage are warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatic resection; Interventional radiology drainage; Non-bilious, non-infected collections; Symptomatic perihepatic fluid collections

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26643300      PMCID: PMC4830382          DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-3041-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  27 in total

1.  An audit of results of a no-drainage practice policy after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Bryan M Burt; Karen Brown; William Jarnagin; Ronald DeMatteo; Leslie H Blumgart; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver.

Authors:  T Takayama; M Makuuchi; K Kubota; Y Harihara; A M Hui; K Sano; M Ijichi; K Hasegawa
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-08

3.  Abdominal drainage after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Josep Fuster; Josep M Llovet; Juan C Garcia-Valdecasas; Luis Grande; Constantino Fondevila; Ramon Vilana; Jordi Palacin; Jeanine Tabet; Joana Ferrer; Jordi Bruix; Josep Visa
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

4.  Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database.

Authors:  Ronnie T Poon; Sheung Tat Fan; Chung Mau Lo; Chi Leung Liu; Chi Ming Lam; Wai Key Yuen; Chun Yeung; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Surgical management of hepatic malignancy.

Authors:  David A Kooby; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  Drainage after elective hepatic resection. A randomized trial.

Authors:  J Belghiti; M Kabbej; A Sauvanet; V Vilgrain; Y Panis; F Fekete
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamura; Yasuji Seyama; Norihiro Kokudo; Atsushi Maema; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Keiji Sano; Tadatoshi Takayama; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11

8.  Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade.

Authors:  William R Jarnagin; Mithat Gonen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Leah Ben-Porat; Sarah Little; Carlos Corvera; Sharon Weber; Leslie H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Chi-Leung Liu; Sheung-Tat Fan; Chung-Mau Lo; Yik Wong; Irene Oi-Lin Ng; Chi-Ming Lam; Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Greater complexity of liver surgery is not associated with an increased incidence of liver-related complications except for bile leak: an experience with 2,628 consecutive resections.

Authors:  Giuseppe Zimmitti; Robert E Roses; Andreas Andreou; Junichi Shindoh; Steven A Curley; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of patients with abnormal liver function tests in the emergency department.

Authors:  Baran Umut Vardar; Carolyn S Dupuis; Alan J Goldstein; Zeynep Vardar; Young H Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2021-11-18

2.  Postoperative fever after liver resection: Incidence, risk factors, and characteristics associated with febrile infectious complication.

Authors:  Hon-Fan Lai; Ivy Yenwen Chau; Hao-Jan Lei; Shu-Cheng Chou; Cheng-Yuan Hsia; Yi-Chu Kao; Gar-Yang Chau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.