Literature DB >> 26642974

Randomized crossover sham-controlled clinical trial of targeted low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation comparing a figure-8 and a round coil to treat refractory neocortical epilepsy.

Laura Seynaeve1, Annemie Devroye1, Patrick Dupont1,2, Wim Van Paesschen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine the efficacy and side effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat refractory neocortical epilepsy and study differences in effect between a figure-8 and round coil type.
METHODS: This single-center randomized sham-controlled crossover trial (NCT01745952 on ClinicalTrials.gov) included 11 patients with well-defined focal epilepsy. rTMS (0.5 Hz) was targeted to the focus during three treatment conditions consisting of 1,500 stimulations/day for 10 weekdays at 90% of resting motor threshold (rMT) followed by a 10-week observation period. Patients were randomized for the order in which the figure-8, round, and sham coil were used. Outcome assessors and patients were blinded to the type of coil used. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of seizure reduction after active rTMS treatment. Other outcome measures were responder rate, quality of life, and side effects.
RESULTS: There was no difference between a figure-8 and round coil. None of the patients achieved an overall 50% seizure reduction. One patient responded during 1 month after treatment with either active coil, followed by a significant increase in seizure frequency. Another patient had a fourfold increase in seizure frequency during rTMS treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides evidence that rTMS is on average not effective for reducing seizure frequency. No difference in effectiveness between the different coil types was observed. It can, however, exacerbate seizures during treatment and lead to a rebound in seizure frequency after an initial reduction. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2015 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coil type for magnetic stimulation; Experimental treatment; Seizure exacerbation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26642974     DOI: 10.1111/epi.13247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  6 in total

Review 1.  Neurostimulation as a Method of Treatment and a Preventive Measure in Canine Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Current State and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Marta Nowakowska; Muammer Üçal; Marios Charalambous; Sofie F M Bhatti; Timothy Denison; Sebastian Meller; Gregory A Worrell; Heidrun Potschka; Holger A Volk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  Dean Walton; David C Spencer; Sarah J Nevitt; Benedict D Michael
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-15

3.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation directed to a seizure focus localized by high-density EEG: A case report.

Authors:  Robert Fisher; Jing Zhou; Adam Fogarty; Aditya Joshi; Matthew Markert; Gayle K Deutsch; Mariel Velez
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav Case Rep       Date:  2018-04-18

Review 4.  Neurostimulation as a promising epilepsy therapy.

Authors:  Yicong Lin; Yuping Wang
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2017-08-23

5.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of real-world evidence.

Authors:  Yonatan A Cooper; Sean T Pianka; Naif M Alotaibi; Diana Babayan; Bahar Salavati; Alexander G Weil; George M Ibrahim; Anthony C Wang; Aria Fallah
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2017-12-27

6.  EEG Evoked Potentials to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Normal Volunteers: Inhibitory TMS EEG Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Adam Fogarty; Kristina Pfeifer; Jordan Seliger; Robert S Fisher
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.