Literature DB >> 26642451

Detection of Contrast Agents: Plane Wave Versus Focused Transmission.

Jacopo Viti, Hendrik J Vos, Nico de Jong, Francesco Guidi, Piero Tortoli.   

Abstract

Ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging provides a cost-effective diagnostic tool to assess tissue perfusion and vascular pathologies. However, excessive transmission (TX) levels may negatively impact both uniform diffusion and survival rates of contrast agents, limiting their density and thus their echogenicity. Contrast detection methods with both high sensitivity and low-contrast destruction rate are thus essential to maintain diagnostic capabilities. Plane-wave TX with a high number of compounding angles has been suggested to produce good quality images at pressure levels that do not destroy UCA. In this paper, we performed a quantitative evaluation of detection efficacy of flowing UCA with either traditional focused scanning or ultrafast plane-wave imaging. Amplitude modulation (AM) at nondestructive pressure levels was implemented in the ULA-OP ultrasound research platform. The influence of the number of compounding angles, peak-negative pressure, and flow speed on the final image quality was investigated. Results show that the images obtained by compounding multiple angled plane waves offer a greater contrast (up to a 12-dB increase) with respect to focused AM. This increase is attributed mainly to noise reduction caused by the coherent summation in the compounding step. Additionally, we show that highly sensitive detection is already achieved with a limited compounding number ( ), thus suggesting the feasibility of continuous contrast monitoring at a high frame rate. This capability is essential to properly detect contrast agents flowing at high speed, as an excessive angle compounding is shown to be destructive for the contrast signal, as the UCA motion quickly causes loss of correlation between consecutive echoes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26642451     DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.2504546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  7 in total

1.  High-Frequency Multipulse, Plane-Wave Acoustic Contrast Imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Ketterling; Ronald H Silverman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Improved Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging With Coherence-Based Beamforming.

Authors:  Dongwoon Hyun; Lotfi Abou-Elkacem; Valerie A Perez; Sayan Mullick Chowdhury; Juergen K Willmann; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Targeting of microbubbles: contrast agents for ultrasound molecular imaging.

Authors:  Shiying Wang; John A Hossack; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.121

4.  Fast, Low-Frequency Plane-Wave Imaging for Ultrasound Contrast Imaging.

Authors:  Jiro Kusunose; Charles F Caskey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  High frame-rate contrast enhanced ultrasound (HIFR-CEUS) in the characterization of small hepatic lesions in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  F Giangregorio; M Garolfi; E Mosconi; L Ricevuti; M G Debellis; M Mendozza; C Esposito; E Vigotti; D Cadei; D Abruzzese
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2022-10-13

6.  Plane-Wave Contrast Imaging: A Radiation Force Point of View.

Authors:  Lauchlin M Blue; Francesco Guidi; Hendrik J Vos; Connor J Slagle; Mark A Borden; Piero Tortoli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Ultrasound localization microscopy to image and assess microvasculature in a rat kidney.

Authors:  Josquin Foiret; Hua Zhang; Tali Ilovitsh; Lisa Mahakian; Sarah Tam; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.