Literature DB >> 26642423

The value of (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for prediction of treatment response in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arman Hassanzadeh-Rad1, Mahmoud Yousefifard2, Sanaz Katal1, Hadi Asady3, Armaghan Fard-Esfahani1, Ali Moghadas Jafari4, Mostafa Hosseini5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early detection of response to treatment is critically important in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the value of (18) f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18) FDG-PET) on prediction of therapeutic response of GIST patients to systemic treatments.
METHODS: The literature search was conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases, and review article references. Eligible articles were defined as studies included confirmed GIST patients who underwent (18) FDG-PET as well as assessing the screening role of it.
RESULTS: Finally, 21 relevant articles were included. The analysis showed the pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18FDG-PET in evaluation of response to treatment of GIST patient were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94; I(2)  = 52.59, P = 0.001) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.49-0.75; I(2)  = 69.7, P = 0.001), respectively. In addition, the pooled prognostic odds ratio of (18) FDG-PET for was 14.99 (95% CI, 6.42-34.99; I(2)  = 100.0, P < 0.001). The Meta regression showed that sensitivity of (18) FDG-PET was higher if the sample size of study was equal or more than 30 cases (sensitivity = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97), when using PET/CT (sensitivity = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97), and self-design criteria (sensitivity = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-1.0).
CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis showed (18) FDG-PET has a significant value in predicting treatment response in GIST patients.
© 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors; PET/CT; Positron emission tomography; Treatment response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26642423     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  19 in total

1.  [18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT versus [18F]FDG PET/CT for imaging of recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Chunhui Wu; Xinhua Zhang; Yu Zeng; Renbo Wu; Li Ding; Yanzhe Xia; Zhifeng Chen; Xiangsong Zhang; Xiaoyan Wang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells on functional recovery and neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury; systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Babak Nakhjavan-Shahraki; Mahmoud Yousefifard; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Masoud Baikpour; Farinaz Nasirinezhad; Saeed Safari; Mehdi Yaseri; Ali Moghadas Jafari; Parisa Ghelichkhani; Abbas Tafakhori; Mostafa Hosseini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Accuracy of cystatin C in prediction of acute kidney injury in children; serum or urine levels: which one works better? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Babak Nakhjavan-Shahraki; Mahmoud Yousefifard; Neamatollah Ataei; Masoud Baikpour; Fatemeh Ataei; Behnaz Bazargani; Arash Abbasi; Parisa Ghelichkhani; Faezeh Javidilarijani; Mostafa Hosseini
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Mixed response on regorafenib treatment for GIST (gastro-intestinal stromal tumor) according to 18F-FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Donatienne Van Weehaeghe; Olivier Gheysens; Vincent Vandecaveye; Patrick Schöffski; Koen Van Laere; Christophe M Deroose
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  F-18 FDG PET, CT, and MRI for detecting the malignant potential in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Kongyuan Wei; Bei Pan; Huan Yang; Cuncun Lu; Long Ge; Nong Cao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multidisciplinary challenge.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Sanchez-Hidalgo; Manuel Duran-Martinez; Rafael Molero-Payan; Sebastian Rufian-Peña; Alvaro Arjona-Sanchez; Angela Casado-Adam; Antonio Cosano-Alvarez; Javier Briceño-Delgado
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Progress in determining response to treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Junaid Arshad; Jibran Ahmed; Ty Subhawong; Jonathan C Trent
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 3.627

8.  Meta-analysis of neuron specific enolase in predicting pediatric brain injury outcomes.

Authors:  Babak Nakhjavan-Shahraki; Mahmoud Yousefifard; Alireza Oraii; Arash Sarveazad; Mostafa Hosseini
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.068

9.  Efficacy of adipose derived stem cells on functional and neurological improvement following ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mahmoud Yousefifard; Jebreil Shamseddin; Asrin Babahajian; Arash Sarveazad
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 10.  Imaging therapy response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) with FDG PET, CT and MRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Caixia Cheng; Leyun Pan; Christos Sachpekidis; Peter Hohenberger; Thomas Henzler
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2017-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.