| Literature DB >> 26642054 |
Ye Sun1, Xinzhe Gu1, Zhenjie Wang1, Yangmin Huang1, Yingying Wei1, Miaomiao Zhang1, Kang Tu1, Leiqing Pan1.
Abstract
This research aimed to develop a rapid and nondestructive method to model the growth and discrimination of spoilage fungi, like Botrytis cinerea, Rhizopus stolonifer and Colletotrichum acutatum, based on hyperspectral imaging system (HIS). A hyperspectral imaging system was used to measure the spectral response of fungi inoculated on potato dextrose agar plates and stored at 28°C and 85% RH. The fungi were analyzed every 12 h over two days during growth, and optimal simulation models were built based on HIS parameters. The results showed that the coefficients of determination (R2) of simulation models for testing datasets were 0.7223 to 0.9914, and the sum square error (SSE) and root mean square error (RMSE) were in a range of 2.03-53.40×10(-4) and 0.011-0.756, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the HIS parameters and colony forming units of fungi were high from 0.887 to 0.957. In addition, fungi species was discriminated by partial least squares discrimination analysis (PLSDA), with the classification accuracy of 97.5% for the test dataset at 36 h. The application of this method in real food has been addressed through the analysis of Botrytis cinerea, Rhizopus stolonifer and Colletotrichum acutatum inoculated in peaches, demonstrating that the HIS technique was effective for simulation of fungal infection in real food. This paper supplied a new technique and useful information for further study into modeling the growth of fungi and detecting fruit spoilage caused by fungi based on HIS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26642054 PMCID: PMC4671615 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The schematic diagram of hyperspectral imaging system.
Fig 2Typical hyperspectral RGB images of different fungi (R: 662 nm, G 554.5 nm, and B 450 nm).
Fig 3Average original spectra of fungi.
Variance analysis of wave crest value of for control and three fungi at different growth stage.
| Time point (h) | Spectral values of wave crest | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Control group | |
|
| 641.4±40 | 695.9±38.2 | 686.9±37.9 | 682.8±20.2 |
|
| 690.6±71.7 | 786.6±75.1 | 1287.2±92.3 | 710.5±24.8 |
|
| 725.3±58.6 | 782.2±66.5 | 3316.2±176.9 | 710.8±60.9 |
|
| 829.2±41.1 | 1290±100.1 | 3815.3±188.2 | 720.1±25.1 |
|
| 1048.5±130.3 | 1357±151.6 | 3927.9±133.7 | 679.4±21.5 |
|
| 2497.1±340.3 | |||
|
| 2755.5±186.1 | |||
a-e Means in a column followed by a different letter differ significantly at P = 0.01 by Duncan’s multiple range tests. Data were means ± SD of thirty replicates.
Fig 4Fitting the growth curve of colony forming unit-culture time by MATLAB.
Results of exponential models for three fungi growth of R. stoloifenr, B. cinerea and C. acutatum*.
| Fungal species | Method | Simulation equation | Calibration dataset | Testing dataset |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rc 2 | SSE(×10−4) | RMSE | Rp 2 | SSE(×10−4) | RMSE | ||||
|
| I |
| 0.9959 | 0.99 | 0.007 | 0.7223 | 53.40 | 0.023 | 0.898 |
| II |
| 0.9948 | 3.79 | 0.011 | 0.7910 | 3.34 | 0.057 | 0.941 | |
| III |
| 0.9979 | 334.00 | 0.106 | 0.7897 | 4.65 | 0.254 | 0.932 | |
|
| I |
| 0.9903 | 1.67 | 0.025 | 0.9367 | 8.77 | 0.756 | 0.899 |
| II |
| 0.9939 | 1.48 | 0.014 | 0.9368 | 7.74 | 0.044 | 0.900 | |
| III |
| 0.9813 | 682.00 | 0.261 | 0.8687 | 14.80 | 0.504 | 0.887 | |
|
| I |
| 0.9996 | 1.23 | 0.013 | 0.9815 | 3.76 | 0.019 | 0.954 |
| II |
| 0.9960 | 2.48 | 0.016 | 0.9914 | 2.03 | 0.011 | 0.957 | |
| III |
| 0.9996 | 18.20 | 0.043 | 0.9906 | 3.32 | 0.129 | 0.955 | |
*I, II and III represented the different methods I, the average of full spectrum in the range of 400–1000 nm; II, the response value at wave crest of 716 nm; III, the value of principal component score of the full spectrum. Rc 2 and Rp 2 were the coefficient of determination of calibration and prediction, respectively; SSE and RSE, sum of squares due to error and root mean squared error, respectively; r, the correlation coefficient of prediction accuracy between spectral values and colony forming unit.
Fig 5Fitting the growth curve of fungi by Matlab (II: the response value at wave crest of 716 nm).
Fig 6Results of PCA for different fungi at 36 h after inoculation.
Results of PLSDA models for fungi which cultured for at 36 h.
| Sample class | Fungal species | Discriminant result | Recognition rate (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| CK | |||
|
|
| 0 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 90 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 100 | |
|
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| CK | 0 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 95 | |
| subtotal | 20 | 19 | 21 | 20 | 96.3 | |
|
|
| 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 100 | |
|
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| CK | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 90 | |
| subtotal | 10 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 97.5 | |
Results of models for three fungi growth of R. stoloifenr, B. cinerea and C. acutatum in the peach samples*.
| Fungal species | HIS Simulation equation | Rc 2 | Rp 2 | CFU Simulation equation | r |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 0.9292 | 0.8594 |
| 0.954 |
|
|
| 0.9835 | 0.7591 |
| 0.941 |
|
|
| 0.9927 | 0.7382 |
| 0.983 |
*Rc 2 and Rp 2 were the coefficient of determination of calibration and prediction, respectively; r, the correlation coefficient of prediction accuracy between spectral values and colony forming unit.
Fig 7Results of PCA for different fungi at 120 h after inoculation in peach samples.