Literature DB >> 26641659

How Lipid Membranes Affect Pore Forming Toxin Activity.

Nejc Rojko1, Gregor Anderluh1,2.   

Abstract

Pore forming toxins (PFTs) evolved to permeate the plasma membrane of target cells. This is achieved in a multistep mechanism that usually involves binding of soluble protein monomer to the lipid membrane, oligomerization at the plane of the membrane, and insertion of part of the polypeptide chain across the lipid membrane to form a conductive channel. Introduced pores allow uncontrolled transport of solutes across the membrane, inflicting damage to the target cell. PFTs are usually studied from the perspective of structure-function relationships, often neglecting the important role of the bulk membrane properties on the PFT mechanism of action. In this Account, we discuss how membrane lateral heterogeneity, thickness, and fluidity influence the pore forming process of PFTs. In general, lipid molecules are more accessible for binding in fluid membranes due to steric reasons. When PFT specifically binds ordered domains, it usually recognizes a specific lipid distribution pattern, like sphingomyelin (SM) clusters or SM/cholesterol complexes, and not individual lipid species. Lipid domains were also suggested to act as an additional concentration platform facilitating PFT oligomerization, but this is yet to be shown. The last stage in PFT action is the insertion of the transmembrane segment across the membranes to build the transmembrane pore walls. Conformational changes are a spontaneous process, and sufficient free energy has to be available for efficient membrane penetration. Therefore, fluid bilayers are permeabilized more readily in comparison to highly ordered and thicker liquid ordered lipid phase (Lo). Energetically more costly insertion into the Lo phase can be driven by the hydrophobic mismatch between the thinner liquid disordered phase (Ld) and large protein complexes, which are unable to tilt like single transmembrane segments. In the case of proteolipid pores, membrane properties can directly modulate pore size, stability, and even selectivity. Finally, events associated with pore formation can modulate properties of the lipid membrane and affect its organization. Model membranes do not necessarily reproduce the physicochemical properties of the native cellular membrane, and caution is needed when transferring results from model to native lipid membranes. In this context, the utilization of novel approaches that enable studying PFTs on living cells at a single molecule level should reveal complex protein-lipid membrane interactions in greater detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26641659     DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  21 in total

Review 1.  Assembly mechanism of the α-pore-forming toxin cytolysin A from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Daniel Roderer; Rudi Glockshuber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Disrupting a key hydrophobic pair in the oligomerization interface of the actinoporins impairs their pore-forming activity.

Authors:  Haydeé Mesa-Galloso; Karelia H Delgado-Magnero; Sheila Cabezas; Aracelys López-Castilla; Jorge E Hernández-González; Lohans Pedrera; Carlos Alvarez; D Peter Tieleman; Ana J García-Sáez; Maria E Lanio; Uris Ros; Pedro A Valiente
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Characterization of Lipid-Protein Interactions and Lipid-Mediated Modulation of Membrane Protein Function through Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Melanie P Muller; Tao Jiang; Chang Sun; Muyun Lihan; Shashank Pant; Paween Mahinthichaichan; Anda Trifan; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Membrane Dynamics and Remodelling in Response to the Action of the Membrane-Damaging Pore-Forming Toxins.

Authors:  Kusum Lata; Mahendra Singh; Shamaita Chatterjee; Kausik Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  Controlling Secretion in Artificial Cells with a Membrane AND Gate.

Authors:  Claire E Hilburger; Miranda L Jacobs; Kamryn R Lewis; Justin A Peruzzi; Neha P Kamat
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 5.110

6.  The Role of Lipid Interactions in Simulations of the α-Hemolysin Ion-Channel-Forming Toxin.

Authors:  Nicholas B Guros; Arvind Balijepalli; Jeffery B Klauda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Folding and Misfolding of Human Membrane Proteins in Health and Disease: From Single Molecules to Cellular Proteostasis.

Authors:  Justin T Marinko; Hui Huang; Wesley D Penn; John A Capra; Jonathan P Schlebach; Charles R Sanders
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Cholesterol Enriched Archaeosomes as a Molecular System for Studying Interactions of Cholesterol-Dependent Cytolysins with Membranes.

Authors:  Saša Rezelj; Mirijam Kozorog; Tomaž Švigelj; Nataša Poklar Ulrih; Nada Žnidaršič; Marjetka Podobnik; Gregor Anderluh
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.843

9.  Pneumolysin-damaged cells benefit from non-homogeneous toxin binding to cholesterol-rich membrane domains.

Authors:  Patrick Drücker; Simon Bachler; Heidi Wolfmeier; Roman Schoenauer; René Köffel; Viktoria S Babiychuk; Petra S Dittrich; Annette Draeger; Eduard B Babiychuk
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.698

10.  Effects of membrane lipid composition on Mycobacterium tuberculosis EsxA membrane insertion: A dual play of fluidity and charge.

Authors:  Supriyo Ray; Salvador Vazquez Reyes; Chuan Xiao; Jianjun Sun
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.131

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.