| Literature DB >> 26641651 |
Reza Mahmoodian1,2, Rosiyah Yahya3, Ali Dabbagh1, Mohd Hamdi1, Mohsen A Hassan1,4.
Abstract
A novel method is proposed to study the behavior and phase formation of a Si+C compacted pellet under centrifugEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26641651 PMCID: PMC4671755 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The schematic illustrating: Si+C embedded centrifugal thermite and a compacted graphite crucible assembly charged with the loaded green mixture A: before reaction (left), B: after reaction (right) while subjected to centrifugal force, the front and behind side of Si-C pellet is identified after reaction.
Fig 2The effect of Centrifugal Force (CF) on the material particles during the centrifugal SHS coating process; (a) before thermite reaction ignition; (b) at the time of initial reaction; (c) molten material about to be deposited onto the pellet; and (d) solidified particles after deposition onto the surface.
Fig 3Schematic representation of forces acting on a moving particle during the hybrid centrifugal SHS process.
Fig 4The pyrometer temperature reading and calculated values of viscosity versus time during the hybrid SHS process; d = 1.00E-04 m, n = 58 RPS, ρo = 7800 kgm-3, ρm = 2700 kgm-3, R = 2.50E-02 m.
Region (i) shows a sudden temperature decline immediately after the reaction started (point A to B), region (ii) temperature drops to the melting point of Fe the point B to C. At region (iii), (iv) the crucible temperature stays steady for 1.5 s around Fe melting point, the solidification of the molten Fe starts at point E.
Fig 5FESEM micrographs and EDS elemental analyses of a Si-C pellet removed from the tube of a centrifugal thermite-assisted reaction: (a) overall topography, (b), (c), and (d) microstructure of typical points; (e) and (f) high magnification of region (d).
EDS elemental analysis of different points on the Si+C pellet.
| Part figure | Spotted area | Si | C | O | Al | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | 1 | 46.05% | 47.07% | 6.10% | 0.47% | 0.31% |
| (b) | 2 | 51.34% | 45.01% | 3.02% | 0.41% | 0.22% |
| (c) | 3 | 88.15% | 11.05% | 0.80% | - | - |
| (c) | 4 | 56.19% | 33.03% | 9.27% | 0.80% | 0.71% |
| (c) | 5 | 83.82% | 8.83% | 6.22% | 0.67% | 0.46% |
| (d) | 6 | 52.31% | 24.36% | 22.16% | 0.75% | 0.42% |
| (f) | 7 | 80.58% | 9.97% | 8.12% | 0.90% | 0.43% |
Fig 6XRD patterns of the Silicon-Carbon pellet after being exposed to centrifugal SHS.
Phase quantification of the as-sintered Si-C specimen at the front (faced to thermite reaction) and back (exposed to molten Fe) sides.
| XRD scan locations | Phase | PDF code | Rietveld Quantification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front side | C | COD 96-110-0004 | 19.90% |
| Si O2 | ICSD 98-017-2290 | 38.70% | |
| Fe3Si | ICSD 98-041-2838 | 3.10% | |
| Fe3.73O4 | COD 96-101-1169 | 1.90% | |
| Si | COD 96-901-2920 | 24.60% | |
| Al | COD 96-431-3211 | 11.00% | |
| Fe | COD 96-900-0665 | 0.80% | |
| Back side | Fe3C | COD 96-101-0937 | 26.08% |
| C | COD 96-110-0004 | 6.10% | |
| Si | COD 96-901-2920 | 8.60% | |
| Si C | COD 96-101-0996 | 8.30% | |
| Fe0.91Si0.09 | COD 96-900-6623 | 7.22% | |
| Fe3Al2Si4 | COD 96-200-5763 | 23.80% | |
| Fe | COD 96-901-3464 | 19.90% |