Literature DB >> 26641558

Factoring out nondecision time in choice reaction time data: Theory and implications.

Stijn Verdonck1, Francis Tuerlinckx1.   

Abstract

Choice reaction time (RT) experiments are an invaluable tool in psychology and neuroscience. A common assumption is that the total choice response time is the sum of a decision and a nondecision part (time spent on perceptual and motor processes). While the decision part is typically modeled very carefully (commonly with diffusion models), a simple and ad hoc distribution (mostly uniform) is assumed for the nondecision component. Nevertheless, it has been shown that the misspecification of the nondecision time can severely distort the decision model parameter estimates. In this article, we propose an alternative approach to the estimation of choice RT models that elegantly bypasses the specification of the nondecision time distribution by means of an unconventional convolution of data and decision model distributions (hence called the D*M approach). Once the decision model parameters have been estimated, it is possible to compute a nonparametric estimate of the nondecision time distribution. The technique is tested on simulated data, and is shown to systematically remove traditional estimation bias related to misspecified nondecision time, even for a relatively small number of observations. The shape of the actual underlying nondecision time distribution can also be recovered. Next, the D*M approach is applied to a selection of existing diffusion model application articles. For all of these studies, substantial quantitative differences with the original analyses are found. For one study, these differences radically alter its final conclusions, underlining the importance of our approach. Additionally, we find that strongly right skewed nondecision time distributions are not at all uncommon. (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26641558     DOI: 10.1037/rev0000019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  9 in total

Review 1.  Speeded multielement decision-making as diffusion in a hypersphere: Theory and application to double-target detection.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Elaine A Corbett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  DstarM: an R package for analyzing two-choice reaction time data with the D∗M method.

Authors:  Don van den Bergh; Francis Tuerlinckx; Stijn Verdonck
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-04

3.  Response biases in simple decision making: Faster decision making, faster response execution, or both?

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Qiuli Ma
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

Review 4.  Delta plots for conflict tasks: An activation-suppression race model.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Wolf Schwarz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-29

5.  Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Craig Hedge; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Low and variable correlation between reaction time costs and accuracy costs explained by accumulation models: Meta-analysis and simulations.

Authors:  Craig Hedge; Georgina Powell; Aline Bompas; Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Psychophysical reverse correlation reflects both sensory and decision-making processes.

Authors:  Gouki Okazawa; Long Sha; Braden A Purcell; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Qualitative speed-accuracy tradeoff effects that cannot be explained by the diffusion model under the selective influence assumption.

Authors:  Farshad Rafiei; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Proactive and reactive accumulation-to-bound processes compete during perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Jaime de la Rocha; Alexandre Hyafil; Lluís Hernández-Navarro; Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal; Daniel Duque
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.