Literature DB >> 26641177

Deconstructing the pig sex metabolome: Targeted metabolomics in heavy pigs revealed sexual dimorphisms in plasma biomarkers and metabolic pathways.

S Bovo, G Mazzoni, D G Calò, G Galimberti, F Fanelli, M Mezzullo, G Schiavo, E Scotti, A Manisi, A B Samoré, F Bertolini, P Trevisi, P Bosi, S Dall'Olio, U Pagotto, L Fontanesi.   

Abstract

Metabolomics has opened new possibilities to investigate metabolic differences among animals. In this study, we applied a targeted metabolomic approach to deconstruct the pig sex metabolome as defined by castrated males and entire gilts. Plasma from 545 performance-tested Italian Large White pigs (172 castrated males and 373 females) sampled at about 160 kg live weight were analyzed for 186 metabolites using the Biocrates AbsoluteIDQ p180 Kit. After filtering, 132 metabolites (20 AA, 11 biogenic amines, 1 hexose, 13 acylcarnitines, 11 sphingomyelins, 67 phosphatidylcholines, and 9 lysophosphatidylcholines) were retained for further analyses. The multivariate approach of the sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis was applied, together with a specifically designed statistical pipeline, that included a permutation test and a 10 cross-fold validation procedure that produced stability and effect size statistics for each metabolite. Using this approach, we identified 85 biomarkers (with metabolites from all analyzed chemical families) that contributed to the differences between the 2 groups of pigs ( < 0.05 at the stability statistic test). All acylcarnitines and almost all biogenic amines were higher in castrated males than in gilts. Metabolites involved in tryptophan catabolism had the largest differences (i.e., delta = 20% for serotonin) between castrated males (higher) and gilts (lower). The level of several AA (Ala, Arg, Gly, His, Lys, Ser, Thr, and Trp) was higher in gilts (delta was from approximately 1.0 to approximately 4.8%) whereas products of AA catabolism (taurine, 2-aminoadipic acid, and methionine sulfoxide) were higher in castrated males (delta was approximately 5.0-6.0%), suggesting a metabolic shift in castrated males toward energy storage and lipid production. Similar general patterns were observed for most sphingomyelins, phosphatidylcholines, and lysophosphatidylcholines. Metabolomic pathway analysis and pathway enrichment identified several differences between the 2 sexes. This metabolomic overview opened new clues on the biochemical mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism that, on one hand, might explain differences in terms of economic traits between castrated male pigs and entire gilts and, on the other hand, could strengthen the pig as a model to define metabolic mechanisms related to fat deposition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26641177     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-9528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Sexual Dimorphism of Metabolite Profiles in Pigs Depends on the Genetic Background.

Authors:  Manuela Peukert; Sebastian Zimmermann; Björn Egert; Christoph H Weinert; Thomas Schwarzmann; Dagmar A Brüggemann
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-04-22

2.  Integrative analysis of indirect calorimetry and metabolomics profiling reveals alterations in energy metabolism between fed and fasted pigs.

Authors:  Hu Liu; Yifan Chen; Dongxu Ming; Ji Wang; Zhen Li; Xi Ma; Junjun Wang; Jaap van Milgen; Fenglai Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-16

3.  Gene co-expression networks in liver and muscle transcriptome reveal sex-specific gene expression in lambs fed with a mix of essential oils.

Authors:  Marcella Sabino; Victor Adriano Okstoft Carmelo; Gianluca Mazzoni; Katia Cappelli; Stefano Capomaccio; Paolo Ajmone-Marsan; Andrea Verini-Supplizi; Massimo Trabalza-Marinucci; Haja N Kadarmideen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Scaled traumatic brain injury results in unique metabolomic signatures between gray matter, white matter, and serum in a piglet model.

Authors:  Emily W Baker; W Matthew Henderson; Holly A Kinder; Jessica M Hutcheson; Simon R Platt; Franklin D West
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A comparative analysis of label-free liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry liver proteomic profiles highlights metabolic differences between pig breeds.

Authors:  Samuele Bovo; Alessio Di Luca; Giuliano Galimberti; Stefania Dall'Olio; Luca Fontanesi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.