| Literature DB >> 26640529 |
Fan-Rong Zhao1, Jun-Xiu Lu2, Mei Jia3, Ya-Ling Yin2, Heng-Tian Qi4, Mo-Li Zhu1, Li-Juan Ma1, LE-LE Qiu2, Guang-Ming Wan5, Guang-Rui Wan2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effects of Xin Mai Jia (XMJ) on atherosclerosis (AS) in rabbits and to explore the underlying mechanisms in order to provide experimental evidence for the clinical application of XMJ. An intraperitoneal injection of vitamin D3, combined with a high-fat diet and sacculus injury, was utilized to establish the AS rabbit model. Following the oral administration of lovastatin, Zhibituo and different dosages of XMJ, respectively, blood was drawn from each rabbit for the detection of blood rheological indicators, such as serum lipids. The pathological changes in the right common carotid artery were observed. Vascular function experiments and the expression detection of common carotid artery-related proteins by immunohistochemistry were conducted. XMJ was observed to decrease the blood lipid levels of the AS rabbits; increase the concentration of high-density lipoprotein and apolipoprotein A; decrease blood viscosity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and hematocrit; elevate the levels of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and Na+/H+ exchanger 1 in vascular tissues and decrease the levels of angiotensin II receptor, type 1 (AT-1) and endothelin-1 (ET-1). In conclusion, XMJ was shown to lower the blood lipid levels of the experimental AS rabbits, improve the abnormal changes in hemorheology, increase the eNOS content in the vascular tissue, decrease the AT-1 and ET-1 levels and increase the endothelium-dependent vasodilation reaction. XMJ therefore has an anti-AS effect.Entities:
Keywords: Xin Mai Jia; atherosclerosis; hyperlipidemia
Year: 2015 PMID: 26640529 PMCID: PMC4665141 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Morphological observation of the carotid artery with the naked eye. (A) Normal control group; (B) vehicle group; (C) model group; (D) lovastatin group; (E) Zhibituo group; (F) low-dose XMJ group; (G) medium-dose XMJ group; (H) high-dose XMJ group. XMJ, Xin Mai Jia.
Figure 2.Optical microscopy morphological observation of the carotid artery (magnification, ×400). (A) Normal control group; (B) vehicle group; (C) model group; (D) lovastatin group; (E) Zhibituo group; (F) low-dose XMJ group; (G) medium-dose XMJ group; (H) high-dose XMJ group. XMJ, Xin Mai Jia.
Plasma lipoprotein levels of Japanese rabbits (n=6).
| Group | CHOL (µmol/l) | TG (µmol/l) | HDL (µmol/l) | HDL/CHOL (µmol/l) | LDL (µmol/l) | ApoA-1 (µmol/l) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 1.55±0.23[ | 0.92±0.07[ | 0.65±0.07[ | 0.55±0.07[ | 0.46±0.04[ | 0.54±0.07[ | |
| VC | 1.52±0.35[ | 0.94±0.08[ | 0.67±0.08[ | 0.53±0.06[ | 0.42±0.06[ | 0.52±0.07[ | |
| MG | 5.08±0.74[ | 3.87±0.57[ | 0.23±0.04[ | 0.12±0.02[ | 4.51±0.97[ | 0.11±0.02[ | |
| LG | 2.47±0.69[ | 2.33±0.38[ | 0.49±0.06[ | 0.23±0.04[ | 2.07±0.56[ | 0.32±0.04[ | |
| ZG | 3.42±0.87[ | 2.73±0.45[ | 0.43±0.08[ | 0.34±0.04[ | 2.05±0.48[ | 0.24±0.03[ | |
| LXG | 1.84±0.35[ | 1.84±0.42[ | 0.42±0.07[ | 0.21±0.03[ | 2.64±0.67[ | 0.33±0.03[ | |
| MXG | 1.77±0.47[ | 1.12±0.34[ | 0.54±0.08[ | 0.49±0.07[ | 1.76±0.55[ | 0.45±0.04[ | |
| HXG | 1.62±0.46[ | 1.05±0.29[ | 0.60±0.08[ | 0.47±0.06[ | 0.75±0.07[ | 0.47±0.06[ |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard error.
P<0.05 versus the MG;
P<0.05 versus the HXG;
P<0.05 versus the NC group. NC, normal control; VC, vehicle control; MG, model group; LG, lovastatin group; ZG, Zhibituo group; LXG, low-dose XMJ group; MXG, medium-dose XMJ group; HXG, high-dose XMJ group; XMJ, Xin Mai Jia; CHOL, cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; ApoA-1, apolipoprotein A1.
Blood sedimentation, ESR and viscosities of whole blood at different shear rates in Japanese white rabbits (n=4).
| Whole blood viscosity (mPa·sec−1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 200 sec−1 | 30 sec−1 | 3 sec−1 | 1 sec−1 | Hematocrit (%) | ESR (mm/h) |
| NC | 2.47±0.01[ | 2.88±0.06[ | 4.55±0.29[ | 6.75±0.65[ | 0.15[ | 1.98[ |
| VC | 2.42±0.03[ | 2.94±0.04[ | 4.53±0.23[ | 6.33±0.54[ | 0.16[ | 1.96[ |
| MG | 3.48±0.42[ | 4.33±0.32[ | 8.09±0.30[ | 13.42±1.40[ | 0.65[ | 4.85[ |
| LG | 2.82±0.07[ | 3.57±0.07[ | 6.88±0.06[ | 11.62±0.04[ | 0.45[ | 3.35[ |
| ZG | 3.34±0.19[ | 4.19±0.09[ | 7.99±0.49[ | 13.41±1.47[ | 0.24[ | 3.75[ |
| LXG | 3.27±0.17[ | 3.98±0.14[ | 7.07±0.14[ | 11.36±0.48[ | 0.29[ | 2.35[ |
| MXG | 2.47±0.01[ | 2.88±0.06[ | 4.55±0.29[ | 6.75±0.65[ | 0.24[ | 2.38[ |
| HXG | 3.06±0.02[ | 3.86±0.03[ | 7.41±0.15[ | 12.50±0.34[ | 0.21[ | 2.45[ |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard error.
P<0.05 versus the MG;
P<0.05 versus the HXG;
P<0.05 versus the NC group. NC, normal control; VC, vehicle control; MG, model group; LG, lovastatin group; ZG, Zhibituo group; LXG, low-dose XMJ group; MXG, medium-dose XMJ group; HXG, high-dose XMJ group; XMJ, Xin Mai Jia; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Magnification, ×400.
Endothelium-dependent relaxation of the carotid artery (n=6).
| Group | ACh Emax (%) | ACh EC50 (µM) |
|---|---|---|
| NC | 94.23±6.58[ | 0.27±0.03[ |
| VC | 92.43±8.45[ | 0.26±0.06[ |
| MG | 42.49±7.84[ | 2.43±0.45[ |
| LG | 67.65±6.51[ | 0.64±0.16[ |
| ZG | 62.24±7.54[ | 0.74±0.14[ |
| LXG | 46.64±7.51[ | 2.54±0.57[ |
| MXG | 57.64±6.59[ | 1.52±0.32[ |
| HXG | 86.57±8.55[ | 0.42±0.07[ |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard error. The vessels were pre-contracted with 1 µmol/l NE (25 mmol/l KCl was used as the contraction agent for the coronary artery); following balancing, the accumulative ACh relaxation effect was tested. The dilatation intensity was expressed as the percentage of the NE-induced maximal-contraction plateau value. Weighted linear regression analysis was performed, and SPSS was used to calculate the various parameters.
P<0.05 versus the MG;
P<0.05 versus the HXG;
P<0.05 versus the NC group. Emax, ACh-mediated maximal effect; EC50, concentration that can cause 50% of the maximal effect; ACh, acetylcholine; NE, norepinephrine; NC, normal control; VC, vehicle control; MG, model group; LG, lovastatin group; ZG, Zhibituo group; LXG, low-dose XMJ group; MXG, medium-dose XMJ group; HXG, high-dose XMJ group; XMJ, Xin Mai Jia.
Figure 3.Endothelial nitric oxide synthase content in the vascular tissue. (A) Normal control group; (B) vehicle group; (C) model group; (D) lovastatin group; (E) Zhibituo group; (F) low-dose XMJ group; (G) medium-dose XMJ group; (H) high-dose XMJ group. XMJ, Xin Mai Jia. Magnification, ×400.
Figure 4.Na+/H+ exchanger-1 content in the vascular tissue. (A) Normal control group; (B) vehicle group; (C) model group; (D) lovastatin group; (E) Zhibituo group; (F) low-dose XMJ group; (G) medium-dose XMJ group; (H) high-dose XMJ group. XMJ, Xin Mai Jia. Magnification, ×400.
Figure 5.Endothelin-1 content in the vascular tissue. (A) Normal control group; (B) vehicle group; (C) model group; (D) lovastatin group; (E) Zhibituo group; (F) low-dose XMJ group; (G) medium-dose XMJ group; (H) high-dose XMJ group. XMJ, Xin Mai Jia. Magnification, ×400.
Figure 6.Angiotensin II receptor, type 1 content in the vascular tissue. (A) Normal control group; (B) vehicle group; (C) model group; (D) lovastatin group; (E) Zhibituo group; (F) low-dose XMJ group; (G) medium-dose XMJ group; (H) high-dose XMJ group. XMJ, Xin Mai Jia. Magnification, ×400.