| Literature DB >> 26640512 |
Jie Wang1, Chung-Chih Lin2, Yan-Shuo Yu1, Tsang-Chu Yu2.
Abstract
The goal of this study is to use wireless sensor technologies to develop a smart clothes service platform for health monitoring. Our platform consists of smart clothes, a sensor node, a gateway server, and a health cloud. The smart clothes have fabric electrodes to detect electrocardiography (ECG) signals. The sensor node improves the accuracy of QRS complexes detection by morphology analysis and reduces power consumption by the power-saving transmission functionality. The gateway server provides a reconfigurable finite state machine (RFSM) software architecture for abnormal ECG detection to support online updating. Most normal ECG can be filtered out, and the abnormal ECG is further analyzed in the health cloud. Three experiments are conducted to evaluate the platform's performance. The results demonstrate that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the smart clothes exceeds 37 dB, which is within the "very good signal" interval. The average of the QRS sensitivity and positive prediction is above 99.5%. Power-saving transmission is reduced by nearly 1980 times the power consumption in the best-case analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26640512 PMCID: PMC4659963 DOI: 10.1155/2015/295704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1System architecture: (a) smart clothes, (b) sensor node, (c) gateway server, and (d) health cloud.
Figure 2Ambulatory ECG analyzing framework on the sensor node: (a) ECG processing strategy, (b) ambulatory QRS detection procedures, and (c) QRS morphology analysis algorithm.
Figure 3Relationship between the QRS complex and the LT signal [22].
QRS morphology parameters.
| Indicator | Formula | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| QRS width | | | 40 ms | 160 ms |
| QRS height | | | 0.05 mV | 1.5 mV |
|
| | | 0 | 1.5 mV |
| RR interval | | | 250 ms | 1500 ms |
R is the real-time R peak position. R is the previous R peak position of the real-time R peak position.
Figure 4Power-saving transmission data transmission flow.
Figure 5Date package format.
Date package format.
| Pattern |
|
|
| Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 0 < | 2 < | 5 < | Disease 1 |
| P2 | 3 < | 11 < |
| Disease 2 |
| P3 | 3 < | 11 < | 0 < | Disease 3 |
| P4 | 4 < |
| 0 < | Disease 4 |
| P5 |
|
|
| Artifact |
| P6 | 10 < | 7 < |
| Alarm |
| P7 |
| 9 < | 0 < | Disease 4 |
Figure 6Attribute values indicated by character string.
Figure 7Experimental design flowchart.
Normal database test results.
| Subjects | QRS sensitivity | Positive prediction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wqrs | MWqrs | Wqs | MWqrs | |
| 16256 |
| 99.99% | 99.74% |
|
| 16272 | 97.00% | 95.76% | 89.79% | 95.26% |
| 16273 | 99.99% | 99.93% | 99.93% | 99.98% |
| 16420 | 99.98% | 99.87% | 99.79% | 99.93% |
| 16483 | 99.98% | 99.93% | 99.88% | 99.97% |
| 16539 | 99.97% | 99.87% | 99.79% | 99.94% |
| 16773 | 99.99% | 99.95% | 99.96% | 99.99% |
| 16786 | 100.00% | 100.00% | 99.97% | 99.98% |
| 16795 | 99.99% | 99.80% | 99.87% | 99.95% |
| 17052 | 99.98% | 99.87% | 99.52% | 99.71% |
| 17453 | 99.98% | 99.80% | 99.72% | 99.91% |
| 18177 | 99.98% | 99.91% | 99.63% | 99.74% |
| 18184 | 99.99% | 99.91% | 99.55% | 99.91% |
| 19088 | 100.00% | 99.95% | 98.29% | 98.38% |
| 19090 | 99.99% | 99.96% | 99.70% | 99.80% |
| 19093 | 100.00% | 99.99% | 99.87% | 99.88% |
| 19140 | 100.00% | 99.99% | 99.82% | 99.85% |
| 19830 | 99.93% | 99.84% | 98.74% | 99.07% |
|
| ||||
| Average | 99.82% | 99.68% | 99.09% | 99.50% |
HRV time domain analysis results.
| Indicator | Normal subjects | Abnormal subjects | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Best case | Worst case | Average | Best case | Worst case | |
| ( | # 16256 | # 16273 | ( | # 230 | # 105 | |
| AVNN (ms) | 787.7 | 795.5 | 818.9 | 747.4 | 794.9 | 748.8 |
| Accuracy (%) | 99.1% | 99.5 | 98.9 | 98.4 | 99.9 | 96.2 |
|
| ||||||
| SDNN (ms2) | 136.5 | 169.8 | 135.7 | 55.3 | 47.8 | 62.5 |
| Accuracy (%) | 98.9 | 99.8 | 98.0 | 96.7 | 97.9 | 93.1 |
|
| ||||||
| RMSSD (ms2) | 27.9 | 39.9 | 46.2 | 43.5 | 61.3 | 24.2 |
| Accuracy (%) | 98.7 | 99.3 | 96.9 | 97.0 | 98.1 | 93.7 |
|
| ||||||
| pNN50 (%) | 7.5 | 17.2 | 17.9 | 5.7 | 9.2 | 2.8 |
| Accuracy (%) | 98.4 | 99.6 | 96.3 | 97.7 | 98.7 | 96.7 |
Power-saving transmission efficacy results.
| Normal ration | 0% | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% | 100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full transmission (Mb/24-hour) | 15.84 | 15.84 | 15.84 | 15.84 | 15.84 | 15.84 |
|
| ||||||
| Power-saving transmission (Mb/24-hour) | 15.84 | 12.67 | 9.54 | 6.33 | 3.176 | 0.008 |
|
| ||||||
| Efficiency (times) | 1 | 1.25 | 1.66 | 2.50 | 4.99 | 1980 |