| Literature DB >> 26640496 |
Laixi Ji1, Haijun Wang1, Yuxia Cao2, Ping Yan1, Xiaofei Jin1, Peirui Nie2, Chaojian Wang2, Rangqian Li2, Chunlong Zhang2, Mingxiao Yang3, Jie Yang3.
Abstract
The Feng Gou Zhen (sharp-hook acupuncture) as a traditional form of ancient acupuncture is said to be particularly effective for managing periarthritis of shoulder. We conducted this randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Feng Gou Zhen as an add-on compared to conventional analgesics for patients with PAS. 132 patients were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to either a acupuncture group receiving sharp-hook acupuncture plus acupoint injection with conventional analgesics or a control group. Patients from both groups were evaluated at week 0 (baseline), week 1, and week 4. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline shoulder pain, measured by Visual Analogue Scale at 7 days after treatment. Secondary outcome measures include the (i) function of shoulder joint and (ii) McGill pain questionnaire. The results showed that patients in acupuncture group had better pain relief and function recovery compared with control group (P < 0.05) at 1 week after treatment. Moreover, there were statistical differences between two groups in VAS and shoulder joint function and McGill pain questionnaire at 4 weeks after treatment (P < 0.05). Therefore, the sharp-hook acupuncture helps to relieve the pain and restore the shoulder function for patients with periarthritis of shoulder.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26640496 PMCID: PMC4657093 DOI: 10.1155/2015/312309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Illustration of the Feng Gou Zhen (sharp-hook needle).
Figure 2Trial flow chart.
Baseline information of two groups (mean ± SD).
| Acupuncture group | Control group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 51.2 ± 7.1 | 49.6 ± 9.7 | 0.3102 |
| Gender (male/female) | 26/33 | 28/30 | 0.6517 |
| Disease history (month) | 15.2 ± 8.3 | 14.9 ± 9.5 | 0.8559 |
| Pain intensity measured by VAS | 7.32 ± 1.51 | 7.51 ± 1.43 | 0.4862 |
| McGill pain questionnaire | 31.52 ± 4.53 | 32.21 ± 4.15 | 0.3923 |
| Shoulder joint function score | 102.42 ± 4.88 | 100.68 ± 5.52 | 0.0733 |
Pain relief and shoulder joint function recovery at 1 week and 4 weeks after randomization.
| Acupuncture group | Control group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 week after randomization | |||
| Pain intensity measured by VAS | 1.25 ± 0.36 | 3.695 ± 1.16 | <0.0001 |
| McGill pain questionnaire | 5.32 ± 1.24 | 18.48 ± 2.65 | <0.0001 |
| Shoulder joint function score | 162.45 ± 10.65 | 158.68 ± 8.56 | 0.0372 |
| 4 weeks after randomization | |||
| Pain intensity measured by VAS | 1.15 ± 0.30 | 6.05 ± 1.31 | <0.0001 |
| McGill pain questionnaire | 3.32 ± 1.18 | 25.48 ± 3.92 | <0.0001 |
| Shoulder joint function score | 208.65 ± 12.95 | 116.52 ± 9.86 | <0.0001 |
Figure 3Changes in pain intensity and shoulder joint function in trial process and follow-ups.