| Literature DB >> 26640279 |
Magda Aniołowska1, Agnieszka Kita1.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of oil degradation on the content of glycidyl esters (GEs) in oils used for the frying of French fries. As frying media, refined oils such as rapeseed, palm, palm olein and blend were used. French fries were fried for 40 h in oils heated to 180 °C in 30-min cycles. After every 8 h of frying, fresh oil and samples were analyzed for acid and anisidine values, color, refractive index, fatty acid composition, and content and composition of the polar fraction. GEs were determined by LC-MS. Hydrolysis and polymerization occurred most intensively in palm olein, while oxidation was reported for rapeseed oil. The degradation of oil caused increased changes in the RI of frying oils. Losses of mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids were observed in all samples, with the largest share in blend. The highest content of GE found in fresh oil was in palm olein (25 mg kg-1) and the lowest content of GE was found in rapeseed oil (0.8 mg kg-1). The palm oil, palm olein and blend were dominated by GEs of palmitic and oleic acids, while rapeseed oil was dominated by GE of oleic acid. With increasing frying time, the content of GEs decreased with losses from 47 % in rapeseed oil to 78 % in palm oil after finishing frying.Entities:
Keywords: Food analysis; Glycidyl esters of fatty acid; LC–MS; Type of oil
Year: 2015 PMID: 26640279 PMCID: PMC4661204 DOI: 10.1007/s11746-015-2715-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Oil Chem Soc ISSN: 0003-021X Impact factor: 1.849
Characteristics of oils used as frying media
| Kind of oil | Acid value (mg KOH g−1) | Peroxide value (meq O2 kg−1) | Anisidine value | Refractive index |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RO | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 2.00 ± 0.85 | 1.46 ± 0.00 | 39.13 ± 0.01 | −0.99 ± 0.10 | 10.40 ± 0.58 |
| PO | 0.10 ± 0.00 | 0.11 ± 0.00 | 3.00 ± 0.48 | 1.45 ± 0.00 | 38.56 ± 2.69 | −1.73 ± 0.45 | 14.13 ± 0.24 |
| POn | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.00 | 3.00 ± 0.29 | 1.45 ± 0.00 | 39.85 ± 0.34 | −1.89 ± 0.30 | 15.13 ± 0.56 |
| MIX | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.00 | 2.00 ± 0.25 | 1.45 ± 0.00 | 41.12 ± 0.78 | −0.42 ± 0.02 | 8.63 ± 0.09 |
Fig. 1Changes of a acid value (mg KOH g−1), b anisidine value, c refractive index, d color (ΔE) in rapeseed oil (RO), palm oil (PO), palm olein (POn), and the blend (MIX) depending on the age of oil
Changes in contribution of fatty acid in rapeseed oil (RO), palm oil (PO), palm olein (POn), and the blend (MIX), depending on the type and age of oil
| Age of frying oil (h) | Contributiona (relative percentages) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C16:0 | C18:0 | C18:1 | C18:2 | C18:3 | C18:2/C16:0 | |
| RO | ||||||
| 0 h | 4.99 ± 0.06 | 1.85 ± 0.09 | 58.60 ± 0.38 | 22.71 ± 0.20 | 6.90 ± 0.06 | 4.55 |
| 24 h | 5.36 ± 0.42 | 2.01 ± 0.13 | 59.86 ± 0.24 | 21.74 ± 0.14 | 5.54 ± 0.32 | 4.05 |
| 40 h | 6.10 ± 0.14 | 2.08 ± 0.20 | 60.71 ± 0.73 | 20.63 ± 0.31 | 4.74 ± 0.61 | 3.38 |
| PO | ||||||
| 0 h | 46.62 ± 0.17 | 3.93 ± 0.20 | 36.76 ± 0.21 | 9.30 ± 0.39 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.20 |
| 24 h | 47.82 ± 0.02 | 4.12 ± 0.09 | 36.87 ± 0.06 | 7.94 ± 0.08 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.17 |
| 40 h | 48.11 ± 0.21 | 4.19 ± 0.12 | 36.94 ± 0.09 | 7.35 ± 0.20 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.15 |
| POn | ||||||
| 0 h | 43.55 ± 0.62 | 3.96 ± 0.29 | 39.02 ± 0.28 | 10.50 ± 0.28 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.24 |
| 24 h | 44.47 ± 0.22 | 4.16 ± 0.21 | 39.13 ± 0.17 | 8.83 ± 0.17 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.20 |
| 40 h | 44.71 ± 0.36 | 4.41 ± 0.05 | 39.15 ± 0.23 | 8.05 ± 0.12 | 0.20 ± 0.00 | 0.18 |
| MIX | ||||||
| 0 h | 32.29 ± 0.42 | 3.58 ± 0.29 | 48.71 ± 0.48 | 11.26 ± 0.61 | 0.95 ± 0.13 | 0.35 |
| 24 h | 33.75 ± 0.30 | 3.78 ± 0.33 | 48.80 ± 0.28 | 9.51 ± 0.43 | 0.59 ± 0.20 | 0.28 |
| 40 h | 34.64 ± 0.32 | 3.81 ± 0.22 | 49.20 ± 0.00 | 8.16 ± 0.37 | 0.49 ± 0.12 | 0.24 |
aAll values are averages ± standard deviation of triplicate analysis
Changes of polar fraction content and composition in rapeseed oil (RO), palm oil (PO), palm olein (POn), and the blend (MIX), depending on the type and age of oil
| Type and age (h) of oil | Polar fraction contenta (g 100 g−1) | Polar fraction compositiona (contribution in relative percentages) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGP | TGD | oxTAG | DAG | MAG | FFA | ||
| RO | |||||||
| 0 h | 3.53b ± 1.20i | ND | ND | 51.15 ± 1.8a | 31.36 ± 1.47g | ND | 17.49 ± 0.64a |
| 24 h | 12.62 ± 0.45f | 5.86 ± 0.23b | 27.40 ± 0.28b | 46.21 ± 0.14b | 15.84 ± 0.14h | ND | 4.69 ± 0.28b |
| 40 h | 17.45 ± 0.27d | 9.02 ± 0.41a | 34.95 ± 0.28a | 42.55 ± 0.20c | 9.41 ± 0.36i | ND | 4.07 ± 0.10c |
| PO | |||||||
| 0 h | 11.63 ± 0.13g | ND | 0.97 ± 0.10j | 12.49 ± 0.69i | 85.32 ± 0.45a | 0.54 ± 0.06ef | 0.68 ± 0.10h |
| 24 h | 16.51 ± 0.16e | 1.44 ± 0.14f | 9.53 ± 0.12h | 19.25 ± 0.13h | 65.97 ± 0.29b | 1.49 ± 0.11b | 2.33 ± 0.23ef |
| 40 h | 21.31 ± 0.11b | 2.48 ± 0.38e | 14.01 ± 0336g | 22.52 ± 0.39f | 55.41 ± 0.25d | 1.71 ± 0.13a | 3.88 ± 0.17c |
| POn | |||||||
| 0 h | 9.89 ± 0.14h | ND | 0.80 ± 0.07j | 11.83 ± 0.11i | 85.10 ± 0.28a | 0.70 ± 0.08d | 1.58 ± 0.29g |
| 24 h | 18.44 ± 0.33c | 2.25 ± 0.08e | 15.36 ± 0.25f | 19.00 ± 0.35h | 60.69 ± 0.43c | 0.79 ± 0.03d | 1.91 ± 0.13fg |
| 40 h | 24.45 ± 0.89a | 3.26 ± 0.40d | 16.57 ± 0.32e | 21.14 ± 0.20g | 55.49 ± 0.28d | 0.97 ± 0.04c | 2.57 ± 0.34de |
| MIX | |||||||
| 0 h | 9.30 ± 0.33h | 1.59 ± 0.08f | 2.22 ± 0.16i | 12.25 ± 0.35i | 84.98 ± 0.34a | 0.23 ± 0.04g | 1.57 ± 0.28g |
| 24 h | 16.47 ± 0.45e | 5.05 ± 0.42c | 17.71 ± 0.42d | 24.22 ± 0.20e | 50.84 ± 0.21e | 0.49 ± 0.08f | 1.70 ± 0.14fg |
| 40 h | 21.66 ± 0.35b | 5.59 ± 0.40bc | 19.41 ± 0.36c | 26.96 ± 0.27d | 44.39 ± 0.28f | 0.65 ± 0.07de | 3.01 ± 0.23d |
ND not detected, TGP triacylglycerol polymers, TGD triacylglycerol dimers, oxTAG oxidized triacylglycerols, DAG diacylglycerols, FFA free fatty acids
aAll values are averages of the triplicate analysis (n = 6)
bValues followed by different letters are statistically different at the 95 % confidence level
Changes of composition of GE in rapeseed oil (RO), palm oil (PO), palm olein (POn), and the blend (MIX), depending on the type and age of oil
| Type and age (h) of oil | GE contenta (mgkg−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C16:0-GE | C18:0-GE | C18:1-GE | C18:2-GE | Sum | |
| RO | |||||
| 0 h | ND | ND | 0.57 ± 0.01hi | 0.23 ± 0.02g | 0.80 ± 0.01i |
| 24 h | ND | ND | 0.48 ± 0.02hi | 0.17 ± 0.02gh | 0.65 ± 0.01ij |
| 40 h | ND | ND | 0.42 ± 0.00i | 0.00 ± 0.00i | 0.42 ± 0.00j |
| PO | |||||
| 0 h | 2.19b ± 0.09f | ND | 2.92 ± 0.07f | 0.70 ± 0.02e | 5.81 ± 0.13f |
| 24 h | 0.93 ± 0.03g | ND | 1.87 ± 0.10g | 0.47 ± 0.08f | 3.27 ± 0.20g |
| 40 h | 0.42 ± 0.02h | ND | 0.67 ± 0.02h | 0.18 ± 0.02gh | 1.27 ± 0.06h |
| POn | |||||
| 0 h | 9.78 ± 0.03a | 0.62 ± 0.02a | 11.61 ± 0.00a | 3.33 ± 0.08a | 25.34 ± 0.07a |
| 24 h | 5.95 ± 0.09c | 0.52 ± 0.04b | 7.61 ± 0.25c | 1.66 ± 0.15c | 15.74 ± 0.02c |
| 40 h | 2.26 ± 0.05ef | 0.00 ± 0.00c | 2.97 ± 0.05f | 0.79 ± 0.09e | 6.02 ± 0.09f |
| MIX | |||||
| 0 h | 7.01 ± 0.02b | 0.61 ± 0.02a | 10.05 ± 0.10b | 2.78 ± 0.22b | 20.45 ± 0.29b |
| 24 h | 4.83 ± 0.19d | ND | 6.29 ± 0.12d | 1.48 ± 0.12d | 12.61 ± 0.19d |
| 40 h | 2.42 ± 0.04e | ND | 3.53 ± 0.13e | 0.87 ± 0.14e | 6.82 ± 0.03e |
ND not detected (LOQ C16:0-GE = 0.105 mg kg−1; LOD C16:0-GE = 0.032 mg kg−1; LOQ C18:0-GE = 0.125 mg kg−1; LOD C18:0-GE = 0.045 mg kg−1; LOQ C18:1-GE = 0.150 mg kg−1; LOD C18:1-GE = 0.038 mg kg−1; LOQ C18:2-GE = 0.095 mg kg−1; LOD C18:2-GE = 0.028 mg kg−1)
aAll values are averages of triplicate analysis
bValues followed by different letters are statistically different at 95 % confidence level
Changes of composition of GE in fat extracted from French fries fried in rapeseed oil (RO), palm oil (PO), palm olein (POn) and the blend (MIX), depending on the type and age of oil
| Type and age (h) of oil | GE contenta (mgkg−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C16:0-GE | C18:0-GE | C18:1-GE | C18:2-GE | Sum | |
| RO | |||||
| 0 h | NDj | ND | ND | NDk | 0.00 ± 0.00k |
| 24 h | NDj | ND | ND | NDk | 0.00 ± 0.00k |
| 40 h | 0.29b ± 0.00i | ND | 0.31 ± 0.00k | 0.15 ± 0.00i | 0.75 ± 0.00i |
| PO | |||||
| 0 h | 1.50 ± 0.00d | ND | 2.07 ± 0.00c | 0.31 ± 0.00c | 3.88 ± 0.01c |
| 24 h | 0.76 ± 0.00f | ND | 0.74 ± 0.00f | 0.15 ± 0.00i | 1.65 ± 0.00f |
| 40 h | 0.34 ± 0.00h | ND | 0.30 ± 0.01h | NDk | 0.64 ± 0.00j |
| POn | |||||
| 0 h | 3.60 ± 0.00a | ND | 4.00 ± 0.00a | 1.06 ± 0.00a | 8.66 ± 0.00a |
| 24 h | 1.63 ± 0.00c | ND | 1.43 ± 0.01d | 0.28 ± 0.00d | 3.35 ± 0.00d |
| 40 h | 0.44 ± 0.01g | ND | 0.42 ± 0.01j | 0.14 ± 0.00j | 1.00 ± 0.00h |
| MIX | |||||
| 0 h | 3.48 ± 0.01b | ND | 3.10 ± 0.00b | 0.54 ± 0.00b | 7.12 ± 0.00b |
| 24 h | 1.43 ± 0.01e | ND | 1.31 ± 0.00e | 0.25 ± 0.00e | 2.99 ± 0.00e |
| 40 h | 0.34 ± 0.00h | ND | 0.66 ± 0.01g | 0.19 ± 0.00f | 1.20 ± 0.00g |
ND not detected (LOQ C16:0-GE = 0.105 mg kg−1; LOD C16:0-GE = 0.032 mg kg−1; LOQ C18:0-GE = 0.125 mg kg−1; LOD C18:0-GE = 0.045 mg kg−1; LOQ C18:1-GE = 0.150 mg kg−1; LOD C18:1-GE = 0.038 mg kg−1; LOQ C18:2-GE = 0.095 mg kg−1; LOD C18:2-GE = 0.028 mg kg−1)
aAll values are averages of triplicate analysis
bValues followed by different letters are statistically different at 95 % confidence level
Significant correlation coefficients (r) between the sum of the glycidyl esters (GEs) and quality parameters of frying oil
| Parameters of frying oil | Significant correlation coefficients ( |
|---|---|
| Acid value | −0.43 |
| Anisidine value | 0.51 |
| Refractive index | −0.49 |
| Triacylglycerol dimers | −0.45 |
| Oxidized triacylglycerols | −0.67 |
| Diacylglycerols | 0.68 |
| Fatty acids | −0.44 |