Literature DB >> 26640116

A long-term risk-benefit analysis of low-dose aspirin in primary prevention.

I-Chen Wu1,2, Hui-Min Hsieh3, Fang-Jung Yu1,2, Meng-Chieh Wu1, Tzung-Shiun Wu1, Ming-Tsang Wu3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term risk-benefit effect of occasional and regular use of low-dose aspirin (≤ 100 mg per day) in primary prevention of vascular diseases and cancers was calculated.
METHODS: One representative database of 1 000 000 participants from Taiwan's National Health Insurance scheme in 1997-2000 was used. The potential study subjects were those aged 30-95 years, were found not to have been prescribed aspirin before 1 January 2000, but to have first been prescribed low-dose aspirin (≤ 100 mg per day) after that date and were followed up to 31 December 2009. Participants prescribed low-dose aspirin < 20% during the study period were considered occasional users and those prescribed ≥ 80% regular users. After the propensity score matching, rate differences of haemorrhage, ischaemia and cancer between these users were calculated their net clinical risk.
RESULTS: A total of 1720 pairs were analysed. During the study period, haemorrhage and ischaemia occurred in 25 (1·45%) and 67 participants (3·90%) in occasional users and 69 (4·01%) and 100 participants (5·81%) in regular users, whereas cancer occurred in 32 participants (1·86%) in occasional users and 26 participants (1·51%) in regular users. The crude and adjusted net clinical risks of low-dose aspirin use between the two frequency of users (≥ 80% vs. < 20%) were 4·12% (95% CI = 2·19%, 6·07%; P < 0·001) and 3·93% (95% CI = 2·01%, 5·84%; P < 0·001).
CONCLUSIONS: A long-term regular use of low-dose aspirin might not be better than occasional use in the primary prevention against major vascular diseases and cancer.
© 2015 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; haemorrhage; low-dose aspirin; primary prevention; risk-benefit analysis; vascular disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26640116     DOI: 10.1111/eci.12575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0014-2972            Impact factor:   4.686


  2 in total

1.  Relationship between Adverse Gastric Reactions and the Timing of Enteric-Coated Aspirin Administration.

Authors:  Weijun Guo; Wenlin Lu; Yujun Xu; Liansheng Wang; Qin Wei; Qingyun Zhao
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Acetylsalicylic acid in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional and a randomized trial.

Authors:  Christian Schoergenhofer; Eva-Luise Hobl; Michael Schwameis; Georg Gelbenegger; Thomas Staudinger; Gottfried Heinz; Walter S Speidl; Christian Zauner; Birgit Reiter; Irene Lang; Bernd Jilma
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.686

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.