| Literature DB >> 26638771 |
Abodolrazagh Hashemi-Shahraki1, Parvin Heidarieh2, Saeed Zaker Bostanabad3, Mohamad Hashemzadeh4, Mohamad Mehdi Feizabadi5, Dean Schraufnagel6, Mehdi Mirsaeidi7.
Abstract
The aim of this multicenter study was to determine the genetic diversity and antibiotic susceptibility of clinically isolated Nocardia species. One hundred twenty-seven patients with nocardiosis were randomly selected from 5 provinces of Iran. Molecular diagnosis of Nocardia species was performed using multilocus sequence analysis of gyrase B of the β subunit of DNA topoisomerase (gyrB), and 16S rRNA and subunit A of SecA preproteintranslocase (secA1). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations. Thirty-five N. cyriacigeorgica, 30 N. asteroides, 26 N. farcinica, 12 N. otitidiscaviarum, and 10 N. abscessus cultures were studied. All isolates were susceptible to linezolid. All isolates of N. cyriacigeorgica, N. asteroides, N. abscessus, and N. otitidiscaviarum were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, while 8% of N. farcinica isolates were resistant to this drug. All N. otitidiscaviarum isolates were highly resistant to imipenem, but N. cyriacigeorgica, N. asteroides, N. farcinica, and N. abscessus were only moderate resistant. The susceptibility patterns vary with different species of Nocardia. Resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in Iran is low and this drug should be first line therapy, unless drug susceptibility testing shows resistance. Linezolid also covers Nocardia well and could be a second line agent.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26638771 PMCID: PMC4671095 DOI: 10.1038/srep17862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Geographic distribution of clinical isolates of Nocardia collected in the study.
The figure was generated by AutoCAD MAP 3D“Autodesk® AutoCAD® Map 3D (http://www.autodesk.co.uk/products/autocad-map-3d/overview)” and then finalized by Photoshop CS5 software.
Shows the demographic information of study population.
| Pulmonary nocardiosis N(%) | Extrapulmonary nocardiosis N(%) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD) | 55.8 ± 20 | 38.6 ± 19 | <0.0001 |
| Sex | 0.760 | ||
| Female | 35(53) | 34(56) | |
| Male | 31(47) | 27(44) | |
| Underlying condition | |||
| Healthy | 28(42) | 28(46) | 0.693 |
| HIV* | 7(11) | 6(10) | 0.886 |
| Solid organ transplant | 6(9) | 5(8) | 0.858 |
| Diabetes | 3(5) | 4(7) | 0.620 |
| COPD** | 6(9) | 5(8) | 0.858 |
| Corticosteroid therapy | 1(2) | 8(13) | 0.011 |
| Others | 15(22) | 5(8) | N/A |
| Chest radiograph | N/A | ||
| Nodular or consolidative opacities | 37(56) | N/A | |
| Cavitary lesion | 18(30) | N/A | |
| Pleural effusion | 8(14) | N/A |
HIV: The human immunodeficiency virus, **COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, N/A: not applicable.
Figure 216S rRNA sequence-based phylogenetic tree of clinical isolates of Nocardia with those of closely related species which computed by the NJ analyses and K2P model.
The support of each branch, as determined from 1000 bootstrap samples, is indicated by percentages at each node. Bar 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Nocardia species isolated from human infection in Iran.
| Pulmonary nocardiosis | Extrapulmonary nocardiosis | |
|---|---|---|
| Most common isolated species | ||
| Commonly isolated species | ||
| Frequently isolated species | ||
| Rarely isolated species | ||
Commonly isolated was defined as frequency rate >10%, frequently isolated was defined as frequency rate between 10% and 3%., rarely isolated was defined as frequency <3%.
Drug susceptibility testing results for clinical isolates of Nocardia.
| Species (number of isolates)/antibiotics | MIC (μg/ml) | Number (%) of isolates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50% | 90% | Susceptible | Intermediate | Resistant | |
| Amikacin | 0.125 | 1 | 25(100) | — | 0 (0) |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid | 8 | 64 | 0(0) | 5(20) | 20(80) |
| Ceftriaxone | 4 | 64 | 20(80) | 2(8) | 3(12) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 4 | 32 | 0(0) | 7(28) | 18(72) |
| Clarithromycin | 2 | 8 | 8(32) | 7(28) | 10(40) |
| Cefepime | 0.125 | 0.5 | 25(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Cefotaxime | 4 | 64 | 20(80) | 1(4) | 4(16) |
| Gentamicin | 1 | 2 | 25(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Doxycycline | 0.25 | 16 | 18(72) | 3(12) | 4(16) |
| Imipenem | 1 | 64 | 15(60) | 2(8) | 8(32) |
| Linezolid | 0.125 | 0.5 | 25(100) | — | — |
| Minocycline | 8 | 32 | 0(0) | 3(8) | 22(88) |
| Moxifloxacin | 32 | 64 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 25(100) |
| Tobramycin | 0.125 | 0.5 | 25(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| TMP-SMZ | 0.125 | 0.5 | 25(100) | — | 0(0) |
| Amikacin | 2 | 16 | 24(77) | — | 7 (23) |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid | 16 | 32 | 17(55) | 3(10) | 11(35) |
| Ceftriaxone | 4 | 128 | 17(55) | 3(10) | 11(35) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.125 | 8 | 17(55) | 5(16) | 9(29) |
| Clarithromycin | 16 | 32 | 2(6) | 3(10) | 26(84) |
| Cefepime | 16 | 64 | 12(39) | 5(16) | 14(45) |
| Cefotaxime | 32 | 64 | 10(32) | 9 (29) | 12(39) |
| Gentamicin | 0.125 | 4 | 28(90) | 0(0) | 3(10) |
| Doxycycline | 0.125 | 32 | 16(52) | 7(23) | 8(25) |
| Imipenem | 1 | 32 | 28(90) | 0(0) | 3(10) |
| Linezolid | 0.125 | 1 | 31(100) | — | — |
| Minocycline | 8 | 32 | 8(25) | 10(32) | 13(43) |
| Moxifloxacin | 8 | 16 | 12 (39) | 8(25) | 11(35) |
| Tobramycin | 4 | 16 | 19(61) | 5(16) | 7(23) |
| TMP-SMZ | 0.5 | 1 | 31(100) | — | 0 (0) |
| Amikacin | 0.125 | 1 | 26(100) | — | 0 (0) |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid | 2 | 32 | 16 (61) | 2(8) | 8(31) |
| Ceftriaxone | 128 | 256 | 0 (0) | 0(0) | 26(100) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.125 | 2 | 10(38) | 5(20) | 11(42) |
| Clarithromycin | 8 | 32 | 0(0) | 4(15) | 22(85) |
| Cefepime | 32 | 64 | 0(0) | 4(15) | 22(85) |
| Cefotaxime | 32 | 64 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 26(100) |
| Gentamicin | 32 | 128 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 26(100) |
| Doxycycline | 16 | 32 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 26(100) |
| Imipenem | 1 | 32 | 15(58) | 3(11) | 8 (31) |
| Linezolid | 0.125 | 1 | 26(100) | — | — |
| Minocycline | 8 | 32 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 26(100) |
| Moxifloxacin | 4 | 16 | 10(38) | 3(11) | 13(51) |
| Tobramycin | 16 | 32 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 26(100) |
| TMP-SMZ | 0.5 | 8 | 24(92) | — | 2(8) |
| Amikacin | 0.125 | 2 | 12(100) | — | 0(0) |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid | 32 | 64 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 12(100) |
| Ceftriaxone | 64 | 256 | 0(0) | 2(17) | 10(83) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 4 | 8 | 2(16) | 3(25) | 7(58) |
| Clarithromycin | 4 | 16 | 4(33) | 1(8) | 7(58) |
| Cefepime | 16 | 32 | 4(33) | 4(33) | 4(33) |
| Cefotaxime | 64 | 128′ | 2(17) | 1(8) | 9(75) |
| Gentamicin | 2 | 32 | 6(50) | 0(0) | 6(50) |
| Doxycycline | 8 | 32 | 1(8) | 1(8) | 10(83) |
| Imipenem | 16 | 64 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 12(100) |
| Linezolid | 0.125 | 1 | 12(100) | — | — |
| Minocycline | 8 | 32 | 1(8) | 1(8) | 10(83) |
| Moxifloxacin | 4 | 16 | 3(25) | 3(25) | 6(50) |
| Tobramycin | 0.5 | 1 | 12(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| TMP-SMZ | 0.125 | 0.5 | 12(100) | — | 0(0) |
| Amikacin | 16 | 32 | 7(37) | — | 12(63) |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid | 4 | 64 | 8(42) | 2(11) | 9(47) |
| Ceftriaxone | 0.5 | 1 | 19 (100) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 4 | 16 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 19(100) |
| Clarithromycin | 4 | 16 | 6(31) | 3(16) | 10(53) |
| Cefepime | 8 | 32 | 10(53) | 3(16) | 6(31) |
| Cefotaxime | 8 | 64 | 10 (53) | 3(16) | 6(31) |
| Gentamicin | 0.5 | 1 | 19(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Doxycycline | 1 | 8 | 4(21) | 3(16) | 12(63) |
| Imipenem | 8 | 32 | 4(21) | 2(11) | 13(68) |
| Linezolid | 0.125 | 1 | 19(100) | — | — |
| Minocycline | 4 | 16 | 5(26) | 2(11) | 12(63) |
| Moxifloxacin | 4 | 16 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 19(100) |
| Tobramycin | 0.5 | 1 | 19(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| TMP-SMZ | 0.125 | 0.5 | 19(100) | — | 0(0) |
aCiprofloxacin may be used as a class representative for the older fluoroquinolones: ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin.
bClass representative for newer macrolides.
cProposed breakpoint with linezolid MIC values >8 μg/mL for Nocardia isolates have been adapted from reference37. Breakpoints are arbitrary since there are currently no NCCLS interpretive criteria.