| Literature DB >> 26638194 |
James Koh1, Joyce A Hogue1, Yuli Wang2,3, Matthew DiSalvo2,3, Nancy L Allbritton2,3, Yuhong Shi4, John A Olson4,5, Julie A Sosa1,6.
Abstract
Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common endocrine neoplastic disorder caused by a failure of calcium sensing secondary to tumour development in one or more of the parathyroid glands. Parathyroid adenomas are comprised of distinct cellular subpopulations of variable clonal status that exhibit differing degrees of calcium responsiveness. To gain a clearer understanding of the relationship among cellular identity, tumour composition and clinical biochemistry in PHPT, we developed a novel single cell platform for quantitative evaluation of calcium sensing behaviour in freshly resected human parathyroid tumour cells. Live-cell intracellular calcium flux was visualized through Fluo-4-AM epifluorescence, followed by in situ immunofluorescence detection of the calcium sensing receptor (CASR), a central component in the extracellular calcium signalling pathway. The reactivity of individual parathyroid tumour cells to extracellular calcium stimulus was highly variable, with discrete kinetic response patterns observed both between and among parathyroid tumour samples. CASR abundance was not an obligate determinant of calcium responsiveness. Calcium EC50 values from a series of parathyroid adenomas revealed that the tumours segregated into two distinct categories. One group manifested a mean EC50 of 2.40 mM (95% CI: 2.37-2.41), closely aligned to the established normal range. The second group was less responsive to calcium stimulus, with a mean EC50 of 3.61 mM (95% CI: 3.45-3.95). This binary distribution indicates the existence of a previously unappreciated biochemical sub-classification of PHPT tumours, possibly reflecting distinct etiological mechanisms. Recognition of quantitative differences in calcium sensing could have important implications for the clinical management of PHPT.Entities:
Keywords: adenoma; calcium; hyperparathyroidism; parathyroid; single-cell analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26638194 PMCID: PMC4727552 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Flexible micro‐raft design. (A) Photograph of the microraft array platform module with four independent grid chambers. (B) Transmitted light microscopy image of a microraft array with numeric indices identifying the spatial location of the field of view within the array; scale bar: 200 μm. (C) Phase contrast image of parathyroid cells adherently plated in a microraft grid array. (D) Parathyroid cell viability after plating. Viable cells are indicated by Oregon green staining; non‐viable cells are marked by propidium iodide staining (red).
Figure 2Intracellular flux response of parathyroid cells. (A) Phase contrast image of parathyroid cells in two adjacent micro‐raft wells. (B) Sequential fluorescent images of the same field of cells in (A) after 2 mM calcium stimulus. White numerals indicate number of seconds after stimulus. Increasing fluorescence intensity is indicated using a standard pseudo‐colour heat map scale. Numbered circles denote individual cell regions. (C) Quantitative record of calcium flux in the four individually marked cells. Flux curve line colours and numbering match the region boundary colours and numbering in (B).
Figure 3Relationship of calcium responsiveness and CASR expression. Distribution of cells in each category is expressed as mean percentage ± S.D. from four independent patient samples. Immunofluorescence images of representative CASR+ and CASR− cells below each respective column. Green = anti‐CASR; blue = DAPI.
Figure 4Kinetic response patterns of parathyroid cells after calcium stimulus. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown on the y‐axis; observation time (10 min. total) is shown on the x‐axis. (A) Rapid/transient response. (B) Slowly rising response. (C) Maximal response. (D) Multiple peak response. (E) Non‐responsive.
Figure 5Proportional distribution of cells in five kinetic response categories at different calcium concentrations. Bars indicate mean proportion ± S.D. from 11 adenoma samples.
Figure 6Dose–response curves depicting proportion of maximally responsive cells as a function of log calcium concentration. Data points represent mean ± S.D. from three independent fields of >200 cells/field for each calcium concentration from each patient sample. Traces of 11 adenoma samples are shown.