Mario Silva1,2, Stefan F Nemec3, Valerie Dufresne4, Mariaelena Occhipinti5, Benedikt H Heidinger5, Ryan Chamberlain6, Alexander A Bankier5. 1. Section of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. mariosilvamed@gmail.com. 2. Section of Radiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy. mariosilvamed@gmail.com. 3. Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. 4. Pneumologie, CHU de Charleroi - Hôpital Vésale, Rue de Gozé 706, 6110, Montigny-le-Tilleul, Belgium. 5. Section of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 6. Imbio, 227 Colfax Ave North, Suite 144, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary parametric response map (PRM) was proposed for quantitative densitometric phenotypization of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, little is known about this technique in healthy subjects. The purpose of this study was to describe the normal spectrum of densitometric classification of pulmonary PRM in a group of healthy adults. METHODS: 15 healthy volunteers underwent spirometrically monitored chest CT at total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC). The paired CT scans were analyzed by PRM for voxel-by-voxel characterization of lung parenchyma according to 4 densitometric classifications: normal lung (TLC ≥ -950 HU, FRC ≥ -856 HU); expiratory low attenuation area (LAA) (TLC ≥ -950 HU, FRC < -856 HU); dual LAA (TLC<-950 HU, FRC < -856 HU); uncharacterized (TLC < -950 HU, FRC ≥ -856 HU). RESULTS: PRM spectrum was 78 % ± 10 % normal lung, 20 % ± 8 % expiratory LAA, and 1 % ± 1 % dual LAA. PRM was similar between genders, there was moderate correlation between dual LAA and spirometrically assessed TLC (R = 0.531; p = 0.042), and between expiratory LAA and VolExp/Insp ratio (R = -0.572; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: PRM reflects the predominance of normal lung parenchyma in a group of healthy volunteers. However, PRM also confirms the presence of physiological expiratory LAA seemingly related to air trapping and a minimal amount of dual LAA likely reflecting emphysema. KEY POINTS: • Co-registration of inspiratory and expiratory computed tomography allows dual-phase densitometry. • Dual-phase co-registered densitometry reflects heterogeneous regional changes in lung function. • Quantification of lung in healthy subjects is needed to set reference values. • Expiratory low attenuation areas <30 % could be considered within normal range.
OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary parametric response map (PRM) was proposed for quantitative densitometric phenotypization of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, little is known about this technique in healthy subjects. The purpose of this study was to describe the normal spectrum of densitometric classification of pulmonary PRM in a group of healthy adults. METHODS: 15 healthy volunteers underwent spirometrically monitored chest CT at total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC). The paired CT scans were analyzed by PRM for voxel-by-voxel characterization of lung parenchyma according to 4 densitometric classifications: normal lung (TLC ≥ -950 HU, FRC ≥ -856 HU); expiratory low attenuation area (LAA) (TLC ≥ -950 HU, FRC < -856 HU); dual LAA (TLC<-950 HU, FRC < -856 HU); uncharacterized (TLC < -950 HU, FRC ≥ -856 HU). RESULTS: PRM spectrum was 78 % ± 10 % normal lung, 20 % ± 8 % expiratory LAA, and 1 % ± 1 % dual LAA. PRM was similar between genders, there was moderate correlation between dual LAA and spirometrically assessed TLC (R = 0.531; p = 0.042), and between expiratory LAA and VolExp/Insp ratio (R = -0.572; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: PRM reflects the predominance of normal lung parenchyma in a group of healthy volunteers. However, PRM also confirms the presence of physiological expiratory LAA seemingly related to air trapping and a minimal amount of dual LAA likely reflecting emphysema. KEY POINTS: • Co-registration of inspiratory and expiratory computed tomography allows dual-phase densitometry. • Dual-phase co-registered densitometry reflects heterogeneous regional changes in lung function. • Quantification of lung in healthy subjects is needed to set reference values. • Expiratory low attenuation areas <30 % could be considered within normal range.
Authors: R Pellegrino; G Viegi; V Brusasco; R O Crapo; F Burgos; R Casaburi; A Coates; C P M van der Grinten; P Gustafsson; J Hankinson; R Jensen; D C Johnson; N MacIntyre; R McKay; M R Miller; D Navajas; O F Pedersen; J Wanger Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: J Wanger; J L Clausen; A Coates; O F Pedersen; V Brusasco; F Burgos; R Casaburi; R Crapo; P Enright; C P M van der Grinten; P Gustafsson; J Hankinson; R Jensen; D Johnson; N Macintyre; R McKay; M R Miller; D Navajas; R Pellegrino; G Viegi Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Emily S Wan; John E Hokanson; James R Murphy; Elizabeth A Regan; Barry J Make; David A Lynch; James D Crapo; Edwin K Silverman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Bradford A Moffat; Thomas L Chenevert; Theodore S Lawrence; Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Qian Dong; Christina Tsien; Suresh Mukherji; Douglas J Quint; Stephen S Gebarski; Patricia L Robertson; Larry R Junck; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stefan F Nemec; Francesco Molinari; Valerie Dufresne; Natacha Gosset; Mario Silva; Alexander A Bankier Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-01-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Susan J Copley; Athol U Wells; Katherine E Hawtin; Daren J Gibson; James M Hodson; Audrey E T Jacques; David M Hansell Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Valérie Dufresne; Christiane Knoop; Alain Van Muylem; Anne Malfroot; Michel Lamotte; Christian Opdekamp; Gaël Deboeck; Marie Cassart; Bernard Stallenberg; Georges Casimir; Jean Duchateau; Marc Estenne Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-04-02 Impact factor: 21.405