Literature DB >> 26638016

An interlaboratory comparison of nanosilver characterisation and hazard identification: Harmonising techniques for high quality data.

Anita Jemec1, Anne Kahru2, Annegret Potthoff3, Damjana Drobne4, Margit Heinlaan2, Steffi Böhme5, Mark Geppert6, Sara Novak4, Kristin Schirmer6, Rohit Rekulapally7, Shashi Singh7, Villem Aruoja2, Mariliis Sihtmäe2, Katre Juganson2, Aleksandr Käkinen2, Dana Kühnel5.   

Abstract

Within the FP7 EU project NanoValid a consortium of six partners jointly investigated the hazard of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) paying special attention to methodical aspects that are important for providing high-quality ecotoxicity data. Laboratories were supplied with the same original stock dispersion of AgNPs. All partners applied a harmonised procedure for storage and preparation of toxicity test suspensions. Altogether ten different toxicity assays with a range of environmentally relevant test species from different trophic levels were conducted in parallel to AgNP characterisation in the respective test media. The paper presents a comprehensive dataset of toxicity values and AgNP characteristics like hydrodynamic sizes of AgNP agglomerates and the share (%) of Ag(+)-species (the concentration of Ag(+)-species in relation to the total measured concentration of Ag). The studied AgNP preparation (20.4±6.8 nm primary size, mean total Ag concentration 41.14 mg/L, 46-68% of soluble Ag(+)-species in stock, 123.8±12.2 nm mean z-average value in dH2O) showed extreme toxicity to crustaceans Daphnia magna, algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and zebrafish Danio rerio embryos (EC50<0.01 mg total Ag/L), was very toxic in the in vitro assay with rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss gut cells (EC50: 0.01-1 mg total Ag/L); toxic to bacteria Vibrio fischeri, protozoa Tetrahymena thermophila (EC50: 1-10 mg total Ag/L) and harmful to marine crustaceans Artemia franciscana (EC50: 10-100 mg total Ag/L). Along with AgNPs, also the toxicity of AgNO3 was analyzed. The toxicity data revealed the same hazard ranking for AgNPs and AgNO3 (i.e. the EC50 values were in the same order of magnitude) proving the importance of soluble Ag(+)-species analysis for predicting the hazard of AgNPs. The study clearly points to the need for harmonised procedures for the characterisation of NMs. Harmonised procedures should consider: (i) measuring the AgNP properties like hydrodynamic size and metal ions species in each toxicity test medium at a range of concentrations, and (ii) including soluble metal salt control both in toxicity testing as well as in Ag(+)-species measurements. The present study is among the first nanomaterial interlaboratory comparison studies with the aim to improve the hazard identification testing protocols.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ag salt; Dissolution; FP7 EU project NanoValid; Hydrodynamic diameter; Nanomaterials' aging; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26638016     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  8 in total

1.  Towards sensible toxicity testing for nanomaterials: proposal for the specification of test design.

Authors:  Annegret Potthoff; Mirco Weil; Tobias Meißner; Dana Kühnel
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 8.090

2.  Toxicity of Nine (Doped) Rare Earth Metal Oxides and Respective Individual Metals to Aquatic Microorganisms Vibrio fischeri and Tetrahymena thermophila.

Authors:  Imbi Kurvet; Katre Juganson; Heiki Vija; Mariliis Sihtmäe; Irina Blinova; Guttorm Syvertsen-Wiig; Anne Kahru
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Environmental benefits and concerns on safety: communicating latest results on nanotechnology safety research-the project DaNa2.0.

Authors:  D Kühnel; C Marquardt; K Nau; H F Krug; F Paul; C Steinbach
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Interaction of silver nanoparticles with algae and fish cells: a side by side comparison.

Authors:  Yang Yue; Xiaomei Li; Laura Sigg; Marc J-F Suter; Smitha Pillai; Renata Behra; Kristin Schirmer
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 10.435

5.  The DaNa2.0 Knowledge Base Nanomaterials-An Important Measure Accompanying Nanomaterials Development.

Authors:  Harald F Krug; Nils Bohmer; Dana Kühnel; Clarissa Marquardt; Katja Nau; Christoph Steinbach
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.076

6.  Multilaboratory evaluation of 15 bioassays for (eco)toxicity screening and hazard ranking of engineered nanomaterials: FP7 project NANOVALID.

Authors:  Olesja M Bondarenko; Margit Heinlaan; Mariliis Sihtmäe; Angela Ivask; Imbi Kurvet; Elise Joonas; Anita Jemec; Marika Mannerström; Tuula Heinonen; Rohit Rekulapelly; Shashi Singh; Jing Zou; Ilmari Pyykkö; Damjana Drobne; Anne Kahru
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.913

7.  Nanoparticle size distribution quantification: results of a small-angle X-ray scattering inter-laboratory comparison.

Authors:  Brian R Pauw; Claudia Kästner; Andreas F Thünemann
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.304

8.  Toxicity and disruption of quorum sensing in Aliivibrio fisheri by environmental chemicals: Impacts of selected contaminants and microplastics.

Authors:  François Gagné
Journal:  J Xenobiot       Date:  2017-11-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.