Literature DB >> 26637837

Neuromonitoring, Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage, and Selective Use of Iliofemoral Conduits to Minimize Risk of Spinal Cord Injury During Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Peter V Banga1, Gustavo S Oderich2, Leonardo Reis de Souza3, Jan Hofer4, Meaghan L Cazares Gonzalez5, Juan N Pulido6, Stephen Cha7, Peter Gloviczki4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review outcomes of continuous motor/somatosensory-evoked potential (MEP/SSEP) monitoring, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and selective use of iliofemoral conduits in patients undergoing endovascular repair of descending thoracic aneurysm (DTA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs).
METHODS: The clinical data of 49 patients (mean age 75±8 years; 38 men) who underwent endovascular repair of DTA and TAAAs (2011-2014) were reviewed. All patients had cerebrospinal fluid drainage, permissive hypertension (mean arterial pressure ≥80 mm Hg), and MEP/SSEP monitoring. There were 44 (90%) patients with TAAAs and 5 (10%) with DTA. Types I and II TAAAs were repaired in staged procedures. Iliofemoral conduits were used for small iliac arteries and to minimize time of lower extremity ischemia in patients with difficult anatomy. In patients with changes in MEP/SSEPs, a standardized protocol was employed to optimize spinal cord perfusion and restore lower extremity blood flow. Endpoints were mortality, spinal cord injury (SCI), and lower extremity ischemic complications.
RESULTS: Sixteen (33%) patients had staged TAAA repair. A total of 163 visceral arteries were targeted by fenestrations and branches (mean 3.7±1.0 vessels/patient). Temporary iliofemoral conduits were used in 16 limbs/14 patients. A stable MEP/SSEP was achieved in all patients. Thirty-one (63%) patients had a ≥75% decrease in MEP/SSEP amplitude in 50 limbs starting on average 75±28 minutes after obtaining vascular access. MEP/SSEP amplitude improved with maneuvers in 12 (39%) patients and returned to baseline with restoration of lower extremity flow in all except 1 patient who developed immediate SCI. Thirty-day mortality was 4%. Three (6%) patients had SCI, 2 permanent and 1 temporary at 14 days. There were no lower extremity ischemic complications.
CONCLUSION: Neuromonitoring predicted immediate SCI and allowed use of a protocol to optimize spinal cord and lower extremity perfusion during complex endovascular aortic repair. Larger clinical experience is needed to evaluate the efficacy of neuromonitoring to prevent SCI.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebrospinal fluid drainage; collateral circulation; endovascular repair; evoked potentials; iliofemoral conduits; intraoperative monitoring; mortality; paraplegia; spinal cord ischemia; stent-graft; thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26637837     DOI: 10.1177/1526602815620898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  3 in total

1.  Rates of Spinal Cord Infarction After Repair of Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection.

Authors:  Gino Gialdini; Neal S Parikh; Abhinaba Chatterjee; Michael P Lerario; Hooman Kamel; Darren B Schneider; Babak B Navi; Santosh B Murthy; Costantino Iadecola; Alexander E Merkler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Spinal cord injury after thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Hamdy Awad; Mohamed Ehab Ramadan; Hosam F El Sayed; Daniel A Tolpin; Esmerina Tili; Charles D Collard
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Perioperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage for the prevention of spinal ischemia after endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  M Wortmann; D Böckler; P Geisbüsch
Journal:  Gefasschirurgie       Date:  2017-05-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.