Literature DB >> 26637688

The radiological evaluation of the hip joint after prosthetic arthroplasty of the proximal femur in patients with a tumour using a bipolar femoral head.

M Drexler1, Y Gortzak1, A Sternheim1, Y Kollender1, E Amar1, J Bickels1.   

Abstract

Excision of the proximal femur for tumour with prosthetic reconstruction using a bipolar femoral head places a considerable load on the unreplaced acetabulum. We retrospectively reviewed the changes which occur around the affected hip joint by evaluating the post-operative radiographs of 65 consecutive patients who underwent proximal prosthetic arthroplasty of the femur, and in whom an acetabular component had not been used. There were 37 men and 28 women with a mean age of 57.3 years (17 to 93). Radiological assessment included the extent of degenerative change in the acetabulum, heterotopic ossification, and protrusio acetabuli. The mean follow-up was 9.1 years (2 to 11.8). Degenerative changes in the acetabulum were seen in three patients (4.6%), Brooker grade 1 or 2 heterotopic ossification in 17 (26%) and protrusion of the prosthetic head in nine (13.8%). A total of eight patients (12.3%) needed a revision. Five were revised to the same type of prosthesis and three (4.6%) were converted to a total hip arthroplasty. We conclude that radiological evidence of degenerative change, heterotopic ossification and protrusion occur in a few patients who undergo prosthetic arthroplasty of the proximal femur for tumour. The limited extent of these changes and the lack of associated symptoms do not justify the routine arthroplasty of the acetabulum in these patients. 2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiological evaluation; endoprosthetic; proximal femur

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26637688     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B12.36366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  6 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: How Often Do Acetabular Erosions Occur After Bipolar Hip Endoprostheses in Patients With Malignant Tumors and Are Erosions Associated With Outcomes Scores?

Authors:  David D Greenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  How Often Do Acetabular Erosions Occur After Bipolar Hip Endoprostheses in Patients With Malignant Tumors and Are Erosions Associated With Outcomes Scores?

Authors:  Matthew T Houdek; Peter S Rose; Peter C Ferguson; Franklin H Sim; Anthony M Griffin; Mario Hevesi; Jay S Wunder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Survival and outcomes of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur for primary and non-primary bone tumors: Single institutional results.

Authors:  Charles A Gusho; Bishir Clayton; Nabil Mehta; Matthew W Colman; Steven Gitelis; Alan T Blank
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-07

Review 4.  Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria A Smolle; Dimosthenis Andreou; Per-Ulf Tunn; Andreas Leithner
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-07-02

5.  Megaprosthesis Reconstruction of the Proximal Femur following Bone Tumour Resection: When Do We Need the Cup?

Authors:  Riccardo Zucchini; Andrea Sambri; Michele Fiore; Claudio Giannini; Davide Maria Donati; Massimiliano De Paolis
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2021-09-06

6.  Artificial intelligence-based classification of bone tumors in the proximal femur on plain radiographs: System development and validation.

Authors:  Chan-Woo Park; Seong-Je Oh; Kyung-Su Kim; Min-Chang Jang; Il Su Kim; Young-Keun Lee; Myung Jin Chung; Baek Hwan Cho; Sung-Wook Seo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.