Literature DB >> 26637678

Knee manipulation under anaesthetic following total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort design.

I Dzaja1, E M Vasarhelyi2, B A Lanting2, D D Naudie2, J L Howard2, L Somerville3, R W McCalden2, S J MacDonald4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) for post-operative stiffness with a matched cohort of TKA patients who did not requre MUA. In total 72 patients (mean age 59.8 years, 42 to 83) who underwent MUA following TKA were identified from our prospective database and compared with a matched cohort of patients who had undergone TKA without subsequent MUA. Patients were evaluated for range of movement (ROM) and clinical outcome scores (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Short-Form Health Survey, and Knee Society Clinical Rating System) at a mean follow-up of 36.4 months (12 to 120). MUA took place at a mean of nine weeks (5 to 18) after TKA. In patients who required MUA, mean flexion deformity improved from 10° (0° to 25°) to 4.4° (0° to 15°) (p < 0.001), and mean range of flexion improved from 79.8° (65° to 95°) to 116° (80° to 130°) (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in ROM or functional outcome scores at three months, one year, or two years between those who required MUA and those who did not. There were no complications associated with manipulation. At most recent follow-up, patients requiring MUA achieved equivalent ROM and clinical outcome scores when compared with a matched control group. While other studies have focused on ROM after manipulation, the current study adds to current literature by supplementing this with functional outcome scores. ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Total knee arthroplasty; clinical outcomes; manipulation; stiffness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26637678     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B12.35767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

Review 1.  Manipulation under anesthesia following total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review of literature.

Authors:  A Kornuijt; D Das; T Sijbesma; L de Vries; W van der Weegen
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-03-15

2.  Manipulation under Anesthesia for Stiffness of the Knee Joint after Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Randsborg; Jonas Tajet; Henrik Negård; Jan Harald Røtterud
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-06-28

3.  Postoperative pain as a risk factor for stiff knee following total knee arthroplasty and excellent patientreported outcomes after manipulation under anesthesia.

Authors:  Mikko T Rantasalo; Riku A Palanne; Sukhdev Saini; Anne P Vakkuri; Rami Madanat; Skants K Noora
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  The effect of a preoperative education class on the rate of manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty in a veterans population.

Authors:  Vineet Tyagi; Coridon Huez; Shasta Henderson; Adam Lukasiewicz; Elizabeth Gardner; Lee Rubin; Lawrence Weis
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-08-01

5.  Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison.

Authors:  Michelle R Rauzi; Jared R H Foran; Michael J Bade
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-03-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.