BACKGROUND: The role of viruses in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is poorly understood. In part, this is secondary to difficulty in isolating viruses. Although traditional detection methods for respiratory viruses have had little clinical utility, modern viral screening techniques that use molecular sequencing are now both rapid and feasible, which makes analysis of the paranasal sinus microbiome more accessible. OBJECTIVE: To detect respiratory viruses in the paranasal sinuses of patients with CRS and of healthy controls as well as to correlate clinical and radiographic measures of CRS with viral presence. METHODS: In this prospective study, 13 patients with CRS with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and 8 patients without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) were enrolled and compared with 14 healthy controls. Samples were obtained from the paranasal sinuses and were screened for viral DNA with polymerase chain reaction--based sequencing techniques. Typical symptoms of CRS, the Sinonasal Questionnaire, and objective measures, including the modified Lund-Mackay and modified Lund-Kennedy scores were obtained. RESULTS: Eighty percent of the positive screens (4/5) were found in patients with CRSsNP, whereas 20% of the positive tests (1/5) were in the CRSwNP group, and none of the controls tested positive (p = 0.0029). Coronavirus was the most common virus detected. Sinonasal Questionnaire scores of the patients with CRS who tested positive for viruses were higher but not statistically different than those without a positive screen (p = 0.31). Radiographic and endoscopic measures of disease were not significantly different in the setting of a positive viral screen (p = 0.12 and 0.11 respectively). CONCLUSION: Although traditionally difficult, advances in molecular sequencing enhance detection of viruses in the sinonasal tract. In this study, respiratory viruses were more commonly isolated from patients with CRS compared with healthy controls. Moreover, viral infection may play a greater role in symptom exacerbation in CRSsNP than in CRSwNP. These findings warrant further investigation into the role of the viral microbiome in CRS.
BACKGROUND: The role of viruses in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is poorly understood. In part, this is secondary to difficulty in isolating viruses. Although traditional detection methods for respiratory viruses have had little clinical utility, modern viral screening techniques that use molecular sequencing are now both rapid and feasible, which makes analysis of the paranasal sinus microbiome more accessible. OBJECTIVE: To detect respiratory viruses in the paranasal sinuses of patients with CRS and of healthy controls as well as to correlate clinical and radiographic measures of CRS with viral presence. METHODS: In this prospective study, 13 patients with CRS with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and 8 patients without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) were enrolled and compared with 14 healthy controls. Samples were obtained from the paranasal sinuses and were screened for viral DNA with polymerase chain reaction--based sequencing techniques. Typical symptoms of CRS, the Sinonasal Questionnaire, and objective measures, including the modified Lund-Mackay and modified Lund-Kennedy scores were obtained. RESULTS: Eighty percent of the positive screens (4/5) were found in patients with CRSsNP, whereas 20% of the positive tests (1/5) were in the CRSwNP group, and none of the controls tested positive (p = 0.0029). Coronavirus was the most common virus detected. Sinonasal Questionnaire scores of the patients with CRS who tested positive for viruses were higher but not statistically different than those without a positive screen (p = 0.31). Radiographic and endoscopic measures of disease were not significantly different in the setting of a positive viral screen (p = 0.12 and 0.11 respectively). CONCLUSION: Although traditionally difficult, advances in molecular sequencing enhance detection of viruses in the sinonasal tract. In this study, respiratory viruses were more commonly isolated from patients with CRS compared with healthy controls. Moreover, viral infection may play a greater role in symptom exacerbation in CRSsNP than in CRSwNP. These findings warrant further investigation into the role of the viral microbiome in CRS.
Authors: Michael Hoggard; Brett Wagner Mackenzie; Ravi Jain; Michael W Taylor; Kristi Biswas; Richard G Douglas Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Anika Kaura; Rishi Shukla; Abigail Lamyman; Robert Almeyda; Mark Draper; Pablo Martinez-Devesa; Ali Qureishi Journal: Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-12-01
Authors: Jae Woong Hwang; Ki Jeong Lee; In Hak Choi; Hye Min Han; Tae Hoon Kim; Sang Hag Lee Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Kai Sen Tan; Rachel Liyu Lim; Jing Liu; Hsiao Hui Ong; Vivian Jiayi Tan; Hui Fang Lim; Kian Fan Chung; Ian M Adcock; Vincent T Chow; De Yun Wang Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2020-02-25
Authors: Elizabeth Copeland; Katherine Leonard; Richard Carney; Justin Kong; Martin Forer; Yuresh Naidoo; Brian G G Oliver; Justin R Seymour; Stephen Woodcock; Catherine M Burke; Nicholas W Stow Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Erick Yuen; David A Gudis; Nicholas R Rowan; Shaun A Nguyen; Rodney J Schlosser Journal: Am J Rhinol Allergy Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 2.467