Literature DB >> 26637088

Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS): Prevention, Recognition, and Repair.

Marie-Andrée Harvey1, Marianne Pierce2, Jens-Erik W Alter3, Queena Chou4, Phaedra Diamond5, Annette Epp6, Roxana Geoffrion7, Marie-Andrée Harvey1, Annick Larochelle3, Kenny Maslow8, Grace Neustaedter9, Dante Pascali10, Marianne Pierce2, Jane Schulz11, David Wilkie7, Abdul Sultan, Ranee Thakar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence relating to obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) with respect to diagnosis, repair techniques and outcomes. To formulate recommendations as to patient counselling regarding route of delivery for subsequent pregnancy after OASIS. OPTIONS: Obstetrical care providers caring for women with OASIS have the option of repairing the anal sphincter using end-to-end or overlapping techniques. They may also be involved in counselling women with prior OASIS regarding the route of delivery for future pregnancies. OUTCOMES: The outcome measured is anal continence following primary OASIS repair and after subsequent childbirth. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library in May 2011 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., anal canal, obstetrics, obstetric labour complication, pregnancy complication, treatment outcome, surgery, quality of life) and key words (obstetrical anal sphincter injur*, anus sphincter, anus injury, delivery, obstetrical care, surgery, suturing method, overlap, end-to-end, feces incontinence). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to September 2014. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Benefits from implementation of these guidelines include: improved diagnosis of OASIS, optimal functional outcomes following repair, and evidence-based counselling of women for future childbirth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anal incontinence; anal sphincter injury; end-to-end repair; obstetrical complications; overlap repair; perineal laceration; pregnancy; sphincteroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26637088     DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30081-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  28 in total

1.  Ecological association between operative vaginal delivery and obstetric and birth trauma.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Sarka Lisonkova; Amanda Skoll; Rollin Brant; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Yasser Sabr; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Could the correct side of mediolateral episiotomy be determined according to anal sphincter EMG?

Authors:  Vita Začesta; Dace Rezeberga; Haralds Plaudis; Kristina Drusany-Staric; Corrado Cescon
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Shiliang Liu; Yasser Sabr; Sarka Lisonkova; Amanda Skoll; Rollin Brant; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Olof Stephansson; Neda Razaz; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Counseling after perineal laceration: does it improve functional outcome?

Authors:  Ashley Vasseur; Karine Lepigeon; David Baud; Antje Horsch; Sylvain Meyer; Yvan Vial; Chahin Achtari
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India.

Authors:  Sirisha Rao Gundabattula; Kameswari Surampudi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The consequences of undiagnosed obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) following vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Annika Taithongchai; Susana I Veiga; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Regenerative medicine for anal incontinence: a review of regenerative therapies beyond cells.

Authors:  Andre Plair; Julie Bennington; James Koudy Williams; Candace Parker-Autry; Catherine Ann Matthews; Gopal Badlani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Parity and anal sphincter trauma.

Authors:  Yanping Li; Ka Lai Shek; Nishamini Subramaniam; Talia Friedman; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function.

Authors:  Emma V Carrington; S Mark Scott; Adil Bharucha; François Mion; Jose M Remes-Troche; Allison Malcolm; Henriette Heinrich; Mark Fox; Satish S Rao
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  Impact of electronic and blended learning programs for manual perineal support on incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Hadil Ali-Masri; Sahar Hassan; Erik Fosse; Kaled M Zimmo; Mohammed Zimmo; Khaled M K Ismail; Åse Vikanes; Katariina Laine
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.