Literature DB >> 26637048

Efficacy and tolerability of switching therapy to vortioxetine versus other antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder.

Mélanie Brignone1, Françoise Diamand1, Caroline Painchault2, Shweta Takyar3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine against different antidepressant monotherapies in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with inadequate response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) therapy.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for monotherapy studies in patients with MDD with inadequate response to first-line therapy. Treatments included SSRIs, SNRIs, and other antidepressants. Identified studies underwent a three-stage screening/data extraction process and critical appraisal. Adjusted indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) on systematic literature review outputs were made using Bucher's method, comparing remission rates and withdrawal rates due to adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: Of 27 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, a few studies were of high quality according to the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence checklist. Three studies contributed to an evidence network for quantitative assessment comparing vortioxetine with agomelatine, sertraline, venlafaxine XR, and bupropion SR. Vortioxetine had a statistically significantly higher remission rate than agomelatine (risk difference [RD]: -11.0% [95% CI: -19.4; -2.6]), and numerically higher remission rates than sertraline (RD: -14.4% [95% CI: -29.9; 1.1]), venlafaxine (RD: -7.20% [95% CI: -24.3; 9.9]), and bupropion (RD: -10.70% [95% CI: -27.8; 6.4]). Withdrawal rates due to AEs were statistically significantly lower for vortioxetine than sertraline (RD: 12.1% [95% CI: 3.1; 21.1]), venlafaxine XR (RD: 12.3% [95% CI: 0.8; 23.8]), and bupropion SR (RD: 18.3% [95% CI: 6.4; 30.1]).
CONCLUSIONS: The current systematic literature review found a few high quality switch studies assessing monotherapies in patients with MDD with inadequate response to SSRI/SNRIs. ITCs indicated that switching to vortioxetine leads to numerically higher remission rates compared with other antidepressants. Vortioxetine is a well tolerated treatment, showing statistically lower withdrawal rates due to AEs compared with other antidepressants. Vortioxetine is a relevant therapeutic alternative in patients experiencing inadequate response to prior SSRI or SNRI therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indirect treatment comparison; Major depressive disorder; Switch study; Systematic literature review; Vortioxetine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26637048     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1128404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  5 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Drug Discovery and Development in Geriatric Psychiatry.

Authors:  Alexander C Conley; Paul A Newhouse
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Paroxetine versus Vortioxetine for Depressive Symptoms in Postmenopausal Transition: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Camilla Callegari; Marta Ielmini; Ivano Caselli; Giulia Lucca; Celeste Isella; Marcello Diurni; Fabiana Pettenon; Nicola Poloni
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2019-02-15

3.  Effect of antidepressant switching between nortriptyline and escitalopram after a failed first antidepressant treatment among patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Ole Köhler-Forsberg; Erik Roj Larsen; Henriette N Buttenschøn; Marcella Rietschel; Joanna Hauser; Daniel Souery; Wolfgang Maier; Anne Farmer; Peter McGuffin; Katherine J Aitchison; Rudolf Uher; Ole Mors
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 4.  New drugs in psychiatry: focus on new pharmacological targets.

Authors:  Filippo Caraci; Gian Marco Leggio; Salvatore Salomone; Filippo Drago
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-03-30

Review 5.  Vortioxetine: Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions.

Authors:  Grace Chen; Astrid-Maria Højer; Johan Areberg; George Nomikos
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.447

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.