| Literature DB >> 26635968 |
Keisuke Izumi1, Harumi Kuda2, Mari Ushikubo2, Masataka Kuwana3, Tsutomu Takeuchi4, Hisaji Oshima2.
Abstract
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) affects older people, and although glucocorticoids are effective in treating PMR, they frequently result in side effects. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to assess the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab as an alternative to glucocorticoids. We included 13 consecutive patients with PMR (11 women and 2 men; median age, 74 years) diagnosed according to Bird's criteria and the 2012 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology provisional classification criteria. All patients received tocilizumab infusion (8 mg/kg every 4 weeks) at our institutions, between 2008 and 2014, because of PMR relapses (n=12) or insufficient response to initial prednisolone treatment (n=1), without increasing prednisolone dosage. Seven patients were on methotrexate, and all had one or more glucocorticoid-related comorbidities. Administration of tocilizumab significantly improved inflammation and PMR symptoms such as morning stiffness, as well as the Patient-Pain and Patient-Global Assessment visual analogue scales (p<0.05). Proximal muscle pain disappeared within 8 weeks, on average, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores (p=0.098) and concomitant prednisolone doses (p<0.05) decreased at 12 weeks. Severe adverse events were not observed during the mean tocilizumab treatment period of 43.4 weeks. Our findings suggest that tocilizumab is effective and safe for PMR treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Corticosteroids; Cytokines; DMARDs (biologic); Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Treatment
Year: 2015 PMID: 26635968 PMCID: PMC4663453 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RMD Open ISSN: 2056-5933
Characteristics of the patients
| n=13 | Patients | Mean±SD | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ||
| Age, years* | 56 | 59 | 65 | 65 | 66 | 71 | 74 | 76 | 80 | 83 | 84 | 86 | 87 | 73.2±10.4 |
| Sex (female, n (%)) | F | F | M | F | M | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | 11 (84.6) |
| Body weight, kg* | 54 | 55 | 66 | 45 | 76 | 52 | 45 | 52 | 33 | 40 | 45 | 60 | 59 | 52.4±10.9 |
| Disease duration, months* | 4.0 | 7.0 | 23.0 | 16.0 | 1.0 | 34.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 65.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 18.0 | 15.0±17.8 |
| Duration of morning stiffness, min* | 30 | 360 | 180 | 1440 | 180 | ND | 300 | 30 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 220±441 |
| Patient-Pain, VAS (0–100), mm* | 54 | 83 | 25 | 55 | 31 | ND | 34 | 10 | 92 | 20 | 20 | 26 | 49 | 36.2±23.8 |
| Patient-GA, VAS (0–100), mm* | 54 | 74 | 33 | 43 | 62 | ND | 38 | 20 | 90 | 13 | 20 | 42 | 76 | 43.7±25.3 |
| Physician-GA VAS (0–100), mm* | 38 | 76 | 7 | 2 | 24 | ND | 35 | 21 | 93 | 40 | 33 | 48 | 42 | 34.5±25.4 |
| HAQ-DI* | 0.375 | 2.375 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.625 | ND | 0.125 | 0 | 2.75 | 1.25 | 0 | 0.125 | 0 | 0.73±0.95 |
| ESR, mm/h* | 21 | 85 | 20 | 99 | 46 | 46 | 40 | 19 | 71 | 98 | 19 | 61 | 22 | 49.7±30.4 |
| CRP, mg/dL* | 1.8 | 6.8 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 14.7 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 3.34±3.83 |
| Previous therapies | PSL, MTX | PSL, MTX | PSL, MTX, IFX | PSL, SASP | PSL, MTX | PSL, MZB, TAC | PSL | PSL, MTX | PSL | PSL, MTX | PSL, MTX | PSL | PSL | |
| Number of relapses before TCZ start | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Reasons for start of TCZ | Relapse | Relapse | Relapse | Relapse | Lack of initial response | Relapse | Relapse | Relapse | Relapse | Relapse | Relapse | Relapse | Relapse | |
| MTX dose, mg/week* | 6 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4.5±4.5 |
| MTX dose at the last observation, mg/week | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5±2.6 |
| PSL dose, mg/day* | 5 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 7.5 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 6.1±4.1 |
| PSL dose at the last observation, mg/day | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.9±1.6 |
| Time from TCZ start to disappearance of proximal muscle pain, week | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 24 | 4 | 10 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 7.8±5.7 |
| Time from TCZ start to GC discontinuation, week | – | 12 | 40 | – | – | – | – | 12 | 4 | 12 | 2 | – | 16 | |
| Length of TCZ treatment (length of follow-up), week | 12 | 12 | 96 | 28 | 32 | 56 | 20 | 56 | 96 | 28 | 48 | 48 | 32 | 43.4±25.9 |
| PSL-tapering rate, mg/day per 4 weeks | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.3±0.7 |
| GC-related comorbidities | OP | DysL, HTN | HTN, OP | OP | DM | DysL, HTN, OP | HTN, OP | HTN, OP | DM, OP | OP | DM, Gla, HTN, OP | HTN, OP | OP | |
| Complications associated with TCZ | – | – | – | Phlegmon | – | – | – | – | – | Thrombocytopenia | – | Legs oedema, leukopenia | – | |
*The data were at the initiation of TCZ.
CRP, C reactive protein; DM, diabetes mellitus; DysL, dyslipidaemia; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GA, global assessment; GC, glucocorticoid; Gla, glaucoma; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; HTN, hypertension; IFX, infliximab; MTX, methotrexate; MZB, mizoribine; ND, no data; OP, osteoporosis; PSL, prednisolone; SASP, salazosulfapyridine; TAC, tacrolimus; TCZ, tocilizumab; VAS, visual analogue scale.
Figure 1Changes in evaluation indicators from baseline to 12 weeks per visit. (A) Duration of morning stiffness (MS), (B) Patient-Pain, (C) Patient-Global Assessment (GA), (D) C-reactive protein (CRP), (E) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and (F) prednisolone (PSL) doses (VAS, visual analogue scale). Asterisks indicate significant differences as compared with baseline analysed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 and ****p<0.0001.