| Literature DB >> 26635852 |
Jie Guo1, Yong Zhang2, Weiping Shi3, Boqiao Zhang2, Jingjuan Zhang4, Yanhao Xu5, Xiaoming Cheng2, Kai Cheng2, Xueyong Zhang6, Chenyang Hao6, Shunhe Cheng2.
Abstract
The rates of grain-setting in apical and basal spikelets in wheat directly affect the kernel number per spike (KNPS). In this study, 220 wheat lines from 18 Chinese provinces and five foreign countries were used as a natural population. Phenotypic analysis showed differences in grain-setting rates between apical and basal spikelets. The broad-sense heritability of grain-setting rate in apical spikelets (18.7-21.0%) was higher than that for basal spikelets (9.4-16.4%). Significant correlations were found between KNPS and grain numbers in apical (R (2) = 0.40-0.45, P < 0.01) and basal (R (2) = 0.41-0.56, P < 0.01) spikelets. Seventy two of 106 SSR markers were associated with grain setting, 32 for apical spikelets, and 34 for basal spikelets. The SSR loci were located on 17 chromosomes, except 3A, 3D, 4A, and 7D, and explained 3.7-22.9% of the phenotypic variance. Four markers, Xcfa2153-1A 202 , Xgwm186-5A 118 , Xgwm156-3B 319 , and Xgwm537-7B 210 , showed the largest effects on grain numbers in apical and basal spikelets. High grain numbers in apical and basal spikelets were associated with elite alleles. Ningmai 9, Ning 0569, and Yangmai 18 with high grain-setting rates carried larger numbers of favorable alleles. Comparison of grain numbers in basal and apical spikelets of 35 Yangmai and Ningmai lines indicated that the Ningmai lines had better grain-setting rates (mean 21.4) than the Yangmai lines (16.5).Entities:
Keywords: association analysis; bread wheat; grain numbers in apical spikelets; grain numbers in basal spikelets; released cultivars
Year: 2015 PMID: 26635852 PMCID: PMC4653486 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Descriptive statistics for seven phenotypic traits assessed in this study.
| GNAS1 | 1.33 ± 0.33 | 0.40 | 3.13 | 25.09 | 1.40 ± 0.35 | 0.35 | 2.55 | 25.24 | 1.37 ± 0.28 | 0.75 | 2.15 | 20.18 | 1.49 ± 0.33 | 0.13 | 2.27 | 22.04 | 1.39 ± 0.28 | 0.47 | 2.34 | 20.10 | 18.68 |
| GNAS2 | 1.42 ± 0.32 | 0.47 | 2.21 | 22.62 | 1.48 ± 0.36 | 0.65 | 2.45 | 24.38 | 1.63 ± 0.25 | 0.95 | 2.20 | 15.04 | 1.67 ± 0.31 | 0.30 | 2.63 | 18.90 | 1.54 ± 0.26 | 0.69 | 2.29 | 16.93 | 20.49 |
| GNAS3 | 1.69 ± 0.34 | 0.60 | 2.69 | 19.89 | 1.73 ± 0.36 | 0.55 | 3.00 | 20.89 | 1.85 ± 0.19 | 1.10 | 2.45 | 10.51 | 1.87 ± 0.32 | 0.37 | 2.87 | 17.10 | 1.78 ± 0.26 | 0.98 | 2.60 | 14.68 | 21.00 |
| GNBS1 | 0.25 ± 0.41 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 162.67 | 0.33 ± 0.47 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 142.98 | 0.38 ± 0.42 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 110.71 | 0.94 ± 0.71 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 75.37 | 0.46 ± 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 87.85 | 9.44 |
| GNBS2 | 1.10 ± 0.79 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 71.75 | 1.25 ± 0.81 | 0.00 | 3.75 | 64.83 | 1.37 ± 0.69 | 0.00 | 3.05 | 50.60 | 2.12 ± 0.78 | 0.03 | 3.73 | 36.85 | 1.44 ± 0.65 | 0.05 | 3.30 | 45.24 | 12.40 |
| GNBS3 | 2.37 ± 0.74 | 0.00 | 4.10 | 31.19 | 2.55 ± 0.70 | 0.20 | 4.15 | 27.28 | 2.55 ± 0.59 | 0.45 | 3.65 | 23.18 | 2.99 ± 0.58 | 0.20 | 4.23 | 19.45 | 2.60 ± 0.57 | 0.43 | 3.90 | 21.89 | 16.37 |
| KNPS | 54.44 ± 7.31 | 33.17 | 94.23 | 13.43 | 57.81 ± 7.56 | 37.60 | 95.40 | 13.07 | 51.45 ± 5.61 | 36.95 | 68.75 | 10.90 | 58.08 ± 6.77 | 42.13 | 95.50 | 11.65 | 55.41 ± 6.03 | 38.53 | 88.32 | 10.89 | 18.36 |
SD, standard deviation.
CV, coefficient of variation.
h.
Figure 1Analysis of regression between grain-setting in the whole spike, and apical and basal spikelets, respectively. Blue dots represent the phenotypic value and the red dotted lines represent the predicted regression line. The correlation between grain-setting in apical spikelets and kernel number per spike in 13JZ (A), 13YZ (B), 14JZ (C), and 14YZ (D); Correlations between the grain-setting in basal spikelets and kernel number per spike in 13JZ (E), 13YZ (F), 14JZ (G), and 14YZ (H).
Figure 2Population structure of 220 wheat cultivars based on 106 genome-wide SSR markers. (A), genetic structure produced by Structure V2.3.2; (B), number of sub-populations estimated by ΔK at a range of K-values.
Seventy-two significant association signals (.
| KNPS | 200–246 | 1B | 14YZ | 6.2 × 10−3 | 22.93 | GNAS3 | 204–216 | 5D | 14YZ | 3.7 × 10−3 | 8.82 | ||||
| 196–216 | 5D | 14YZ | 7.7 × 10−3 | 11.54 | 196–216 | 5D | 13JZ | 7.2 × 10−3 | 8.60 | ||||||
| 148–188 | 6B | 13JZ | 8.9 × 10−3 | 9.82 | GNBS1 | 140–154 | 1D | 14JZ | 4.9 × 10−3 | 8.84 | |||||
| 142–186 | 7B | 14YZ | 9.2 × 10−3 | 17.04 | 206–304 | 3B | 13YZ | 8.2 × 10−4 | 20.49 | ||||||
| 204–228 | 7B | 13YZ | 5.5 × 10−3 | 11.35 | 149–171 | 4B | 13JZ | 1.8 × 10−3 | 11.77 | ||||||
| 14YZ | 4.8 × 10−3 | 10.79 | 127–135 | 4D | 13JZ | 1.4 × 10−5 | 13.48 | Zhang et al., | |||||||
| GNAS1 | 168–224 | 1A | 13YZ | 2.1 × 10−3 | 18.69 | 191–199 | 5A | 13JZ | 1.1 × 10−4 | 13.31 | |||||
| 84–118 | 1B | 13JZ | 1.6 × 10−3 | 16.87 | 14JZ | 3.8 × 10−4 | 8.30 | ||||||||
| 140–154 | 1D | 13JZ | 1.5 × 10−3 | 10.11 | 98–150 | 5A | 13JZ | 5.2 × 10−3 | 11.95 | Peng et al., | |||||
| 136–166 | 2B | 14JZ | 6.2 × 10−3 | 11.35 | 13YZ | 8.3 × 10−5 | 19.44 | Guo et al., | |||||||
| 14YZ | 2.6 × 10−3 | 14.77 | 225–249 | 5B | 13JZ | 1.4 × 10−3 | 16.43 | Guo et al., | |||||||
| 197–217 | 2B | 13JZ | 3.1 × 10−3 | 10.49 | 78–100 | 5D | 13YZ | 6.1 × 10−3 | 8.31 | ||||||
| 134–154 | 2D | 13YZ | 6.1 × 10−3 | 14.55 | Guo et al., | 303–327 | 7A | 13JZ | 5.1 × 10−3 | 10.21 | |||||
| 131–185 | 2D | 13YZ | 5.1 × 10−3 | 21.95 | 13YZ | 7.5 × 10−4 | 15.53 | ||||||||
| 278–284 | 5D | 14YZ | 2.3 × 10−3 | 9.11 | Zhang et al., | 204–228 | 7B | 14JZ | 5.3 × 10−3 | 11.39 | |||||
| 181–203 | 6A | 13YZ | 9.1 × 10−3 | 9.92 | GNBS2 | 140–154 | 1D | 14JZ | 8.7 × 10−3 | 8.59 | |||||
| 184–188 | 6D | 13JZ | 3.7 × 10−3 | 4.06 | Zhang et al., | 299–321 | 3B | 13JZ | 9.0 × 10−3 | 13.98 | |||||
| GNAS2 | 168–224 | 1A | 13YZ | 4.4 × 10−3 | 16.58 | 204–228 | 7B | 13YZ | 1.6 × 10−3 | 15.17 | |||||
| 14YZ | 9.8 × 10−3 | 15.41 | 14JZ | 6.4 × 10−3 | 11.95 | ||||||||||
| 186–252 | 2A | 14YZ | 1.1 × 10−3 | 20.24 | GNBS3 | 130–144 | 1B | 14YZ | 4.1 × 10−5 | 16.87 | |||||
| 136–166 | 2B | 14YZ | 1.3 × 10−3 | 14.71 | 168–198 | 1D | 14YZ | 7.3 × 10−3 | 14.82 | Zhang et al., | |||||
| 134–154 | 2D | 13JZ | 5.1 × 10−3 | 15.68 | Guo et al., | 160–180 | 2B | 14YZ | 4.7 × 10−3 | 13.20 | |||||
| 13YZ | 4.2 × 10−3 | 15.03 | 105–131 | 3B | 13JZ | 4.1 × 10−3 | 8.05 | Zhang et al., | |||||||
| 299–321 | 3B | 13JZ | 8.0 × 10−3 | 11.80 | 13YZ | 2.4 × 10−3 | 9.27 | ||||||||
| 278–284 | 5D | 14YZ | 4.0 × 10−4 | 10.20 | Zhang et al., | 14JZ | 3.4 × 10−3 | 9.57 | |||||||
| GNAS3 | 168–224 | 1A | 13YZ | 7.9 × 10−4 | 20.00 | 117–137 | 5A | 13YZ | 9.5 × 10−3 | 5.98 | |||||
| 14YZ | 1.4 × 10−3 | 19.44 | 14JZ | 1.1 × 10−3 | 10.44 | ||||||||||
| 125–145 | 1A | 14YZ | 7.8 × 10−3 | 10.31 | Zhang et al., | 130–132 | 5A | 13JZ | 4.2 × 10−3 | 9.36 | Guo et al., | ||||
| 130–144 | 1B | 14YZ | 6.7 × 10−3 | 8.94 | 13YZ | 6.8 × 10−3 | 3.71 | ||||||||
| 186–252 | 2A | 14YZ | 7.2 × 10−4 | 21.23 | 14JZ | 5.5 × 10−3 | 7.27 | ||||||||
| 105–129 | 2A | 13YZ | 6.9 × 10−3 | 12.13 | 96–146 | 5B | 14YZ | 2.6 × 10−3 | 14.16 | ||||||
| 136–166 | 2B | 14YZ | 3.5 × 10−4 | 16.65 | 204–216 | 5D | 14YZ | 6.0 × 10−4 | 13.51 | ||||||
| 197–217 | 2B | 13YZ | 1.3 × 10−3 | 8.83 | 118–138 | 6D | 13YZ | 5.5 × 10−3 | 13.31 | Guo et al., | |||||
| 134–154 | 2D | 13YZ | 4.0 × 10−3 | 16.48 | Guo et al., | 14JZ | 8.6 × 10−3 | 14.23 | |||||||
| 149–171 | 4B | 13YZ | 9.8 × 10−3 | 8.88 | 204–228 | 7B | 13JZ | 3.5 × 10−3 | 12.21 | ||||||
| 278–284 | 5D | 14YZ | 1.3 × 10−4 | 12.11 | Zhang et al., | 13YZ | 1.2 × 10−3 | 14.64 |
Figure 3Favorable allele of . (A) QTL locus at Xgwm186-5AL (Peng et al., 2003); (B) Association signals in the natural population using a mixed linear model (P < 0.01); green dots represents the associated signal of Xgwm186 in different environments; (C) Frequency distribution of Xgwm186-5A alleles in the population; green bar represents favorable allele of 118 bp; (D) Genetic effects of Xgwm186-5A in environments 13JZ and 13YZ.
Figure 4Relationships between grain numbers in apical and basal spikelets and the number of favorable alleles. (A) The relatedness between the grain numbers in apical spikelets and number of favorable alleles. (B) The relatedness between the grain numbers in basal spikelets and number of favorable alleles.
Figure 5Distribution of favorable alleles associated with grain numbers in apical and basal spikelets in Yangmai and Ningmai varieties. (A) Distribution of favorable alleles associated with grain-setting in apical spikelets in Yangmai and Ningmai varieties. (B) Distribution of favorable alleles associated with grain-setting in basal spikelets in Yangmai and Ningmai varieties.
Figure 6Relationships between average grain-setting rates in apical and basal spikelets, and numbers of favorable alleles.