| Literature DB >> 26635555 |
Laura Del Hoyo1, Laura Xicota2, Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides3, Aida Cuenca-Royo3, Susana de Sola4, Klaus Langohr5, Ana B Fagundo6, Magí Farré1, Mara Dierssen7, Rafael de la Torre8.
Abstract
Down syndrome (DS) is an intellectual disability (ID) disorder in which language and specifically, verbal fluency are strongly impaired domains; nearly all adults show neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including amyloid deposition by their fifth decade of life. In the general population, verbal fluency deficits are considered a strong AD predictor being the semantic verbal fluency task (SVFT) a useful tool for enhancing early diagnostic. However, there is a lack of information about the association between the semantic verbal fluency pattern (SVFP) and the biological amyloidosis markers in DS. In the current study, we used the SVFT in young adults with DS to characterize their SVFP, assessing total generated words, clustering, and switching. We then explored its association with early indicators of dementia, adaptive behavior and amyloidosis biomarkers, using the Dementia Questionnaire for Persons with Intellectual Disability (DMR), the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition (ABAS-II), and plasma levels of Aβ peptides (Aβ40 and Aβ42), as a potent biomarker of AD. In DS, worse performance in SVFT and poorer communication skills were associated with higher plasma Aβ42 concentrations, a higher DMR score and impaired communication skills (ABAS-II). The total word production and switching ability in SVFT were good indicators of plasma Aβ42 concentration. In conclusion, we propose the SVFT as a good screening test for early detection of dementia and amyloidosis in young adults with DS.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Aβ; DMR; Down syndrome; amyloid precursor protein; communication skills; semantic verbal fluency; switching
Year: 2015 PMID: 26635555 PMCID: PMC4649024 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Behav Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5153 Impact factor: 3.558
Cognitive performance in DS individuals compared to standard norms.
| Down syndrome | Reference standard norms | Standardized mean differences | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verbal fluency | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | ||
| Number of correct words in 60’ | 9.4 (4.1) | 1–20 | 25.1 (5.7) | 11–38 | −3.13 | [−3.69, −2.57] |
| Percentage of correct words 0–15’ | 39.2 (16.6) | 0–100 | 39.6 (7.9) | 25–54 | −0.03 | [−0.46, 0.4] |
| Percentage of correct words 16–30 | 28.1 (12.3) | 0–50 | 22.7 (6.5) | 14–39 | 0.53 | [0.09, 0.96] |
| Percentage of correct words 31–45 | 16.4 (12.4) | 0–50 | 18.6 (5.8) | 5–32 | −0.22 | [−0.65, 0.21] |
| Percentage of correct words 46–60 | 17.1 (12.0) | 0–60 | 18.6 (9.5) | 0–46 | −0.14 | [−0.56, 0.29] |
| Number of switches | 4.3 (2.5) | 0–13 | 7.4 (2.1) | 3–11 | −1.4 | [−1.82, −0.97] |
| Mean cluster size | 1.1 (0.8) | 0–3.3 | 2.8 (0.9) | 1.4–6.6 | −1.93 | [−2.39, −1.46] |
The standardized mean differences are calculated using Cohen’s d. Age range: DS: 17–34, Reference standard norms 18–33 Sample size: DS: n = 51, Reference Standard norm: n = 59.
Correlation between fluency strategies and the total number of words produced (Pearson’s correlation coefficient).
| Total correct words | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Down syndrome | Reference standard norms | |||
| Correlation [95%- | Correlation [95%- | |||
| Number of switches | 0.73 [0.57, 0.84] | <0.001 | 0.17 [−0.1, 0.41] | 0.244 |
| Mean cluster size | 0.3 [0.02, 0.53] | 0.039 | 0.49 [0.26, 0.67] | <0.001 |
| Percentage of animals in the first 15 s | 0.03 [−0.25, 0.31] | 0.84 | −0.54 [−0.73, −0.25] | 0.001 |
| Percentage of animals in the last 45 s | 0.11 [−0.18, 0.38] | 0.453 | 0.51 [0.22, 0.72] | 0.001 |
Association between the verbal fluency pattern and the intellectual quotient (IQ), sex and age in DS individuals.
| IQ (<40 vs. ≥40) | Sex (Women vs. men) | Age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verbal fluency outcomes | Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | |||
| Number of correct words in 60 s | −1.04 (1.18) | 0.386 | 0.45 (1.17) | 0.704 | 0.18 (0.13) | 0.190 |
| Number of switches | 0.25 (0.73) | 0.736 | 0.44 (0.72) | 0.547 | 0.04 (0.08) | 0.663 |
| Mean cluster size | −0.36 (0.23) | 0.112 | −0.07 (0.22) | 0.750 | 0.02 (0.03) | 0.488 |
Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), and p-values are obtained from ANCOVA models.
Association between Aβ concentrations and intellectual quotient (IQ), sex, and age in DS individuals.
| IQ (<40 vs. ≥40) | Sex (Women vs. men) | Age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aβ concentrations | Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | |||
| Aβ42 | −2.05 (2.97) | 0.495 | 2.12 (2.94) | 0.475 | −0.21 (0.33) | 0.527 |
| Aβ40 | −38.2 (14.6) | 0.012 | 19.9 (14.2) | 0.167 | −0.26 (1.59) | 0.873 |
| Aβ40/42 | 0.007 (0.013) | 0.564 | 0.004 (0.012) | 0.758 | −0.0002 (0.001) | 0.893 |
Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), and p-values are obtained from ANCOVA models.
Association between Aβ.
| Estimate | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of correct words in 60’ | −0.187 (0.052) | <0.001 |
| Number of switches | −0.085 (0.035) | 0.018 |
| Mean cluster size | −0.006 (0.011) | 0.582 |
| ABAS adaptive behavior: communication skills | −0.532 (0.158) | 0.001 |
| DMR total score | 0.366 (0.113) | 0.002 |
Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), and p-values are obtained from ANCOVA models adjusted for IQ, age, and sex.
Figure 1Verbal fluency and functional measures as a function of Aβ Correlations are shown for Aβ42 and Upper panel: number of correct words (left) and number of switches (right). Lower panel: ABAS adaptive behavior (left) and DMR total score (right). The figures include the regression lines from the corresponding linear regression models.
Correlation between cognitive and functional variables measured using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
| DMR total | ABAS total | ABAS communication skills | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation [95%- | Correlation [95%- | Correlation [95%- | ||||
| Number of correct words in 60’ | −0.5 [−0.68, −0.25] | <0.001 | 0.32 [0.05, 0.55] | 0.024 | 0.45 [0.2, 0.65] | 0.001 |
| Number of switches | −0.39 [−0.6, −0.12] | 0.006 | 0.21 [−0.07, 0.46] | 0.144 | 0.28 [0.01, 0.52] | 0.046 |
| Mean cluster size | −0.14 [−0.41, 0.14] | 0.328 | 0.13 [−0.15, 0.4] | 0.36 | 0.22 [−0.06, 0.47] | 0.127 |