Literature DB >> 26635347

Sampling frequency affects the processing of Actigraph raw acceleration data to activity counts.

Jan Christian Brønd1, Daniel Arvidsson2.   

Abstract

ActiGraph acceleration data are processed through several steps (including band-pass filtering to attenuate unwanted signal frequencies) to generate the activity counts commonly used in physical activity research. We performed three experiments to investigate the effect of sampling frequency on the generation of activity counts. Ideal acceleration signals were produced in the MATLAB software. Thereafter, ActiGraph GT3X+ monitors were spun in a mechanical setup. Finally, 20 subjects performed walking and running wearing GT3X+ monitors. Acceleration data from all experiments were collected with different sampling frequencies, and activity counts were generated with the ActiLife software. With the default 30-Hz (or 60-Hz, 90-Hz) sampling frequency, the generation of activity counts was performed as intended with 50% attenuation of acceleration signals with a frequency of 2.5 Hz by the signal frequency band-pass filter. Frequencies above 5 Hz were eliminated totally. However, with other sampling frequencies, acceleration signals above 5 Hz escaped the band-pass filter to a varied degree and contributed to additional activity counts. Similar results were found for the spinning of the GT3X+ monitors, although the amount of activity counts generated was less, indicating that raw data stored in the GT3X+ monitor is processed. Between 600 and 1,600 more counts per minute were generated with the sampling frequencies 40 and 100 Hz compared with 30 Hz during running. Sampling frequency affects the processing of ActiGraph acceleration data to activity counts. Researchers need to be aware of this error when selecting sampling frequencies other than the default 30 Hz.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  accelerometer; amplitude; frequency; mechanics; oscillation; physical activity; running; walking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26635347     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00628.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  27 in total

1.  Accelerometry data in health research: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Marta Karas; Jiawei Bai; Marcin Strączkiewicz; Jaroslaw Harezlak; Nancy W Glynn; Tamara Harris; Vadim Zipunnikov; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Jacek K Urbanek
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2019-01-12

2.  Quantification of acceleration as activity counts in ActiGraph wearable.

Authors:  Ali Neishabouri; Joe Nguyen; John Samuelsson; Tyler Guthrie; Matt Biggs; Jeremy Wyatt; Doug Cross; Marta Karas; Jairo H Migueles; Sheraz Khan; Christine C Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Meeting 24-h movement guidelines and markers of adiposity in adults from eight Latin America countries: the ELANS study.

Authors:  Gerson Ferrari; Carlos Cristi-Montero; Clemens Drenowatz; Irina Kovalskys; Georgina Gómez; Attilio Rigotti; Lilia Yadira Cortés; Martha Yépez García; Maria Reyna Liria-Domínguez; Marianella Herrera-Cuenca; Miguel Peralta; Adilson Marques; Priscila Marconcin; Roberto Fernandes da Costa; Ana Carolina B Leme; Claudio Farías-Valenzuela; Paloma Ferrero-Hernández; Mauro Fisberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  An Open-Source Monitor-Independent Movement Summary for Accelerometer Data Processing.

Authors:  Dinesh John; Qu Tang; Fahd Albinali; Stephen Intille
Journal:  J Meas Phys Behav       Date:  2019-12

5.  Accelerometer-Measured Daily Step Counts and Adiposity Indicators among Latin American Adults: A Multi-Country Study.

Authors:  Gerson Ferrari; Adilson Marques; Tiago V Barreira; Irina Kovalskys; Georgina Gómez; Attilio Rigotti; Lilia Yadira Cortés; Martha Cecilia Yépez García; Rossina G Pareja; Marianella Herrera-Cuenca; Viviana Guajardo; Ana Carolina B Leme; Juan Guzmán Habinger; Pedro Valdivia-Moral; Mónica Suárez-Reyes; Andreas Ihle; Elvio R Gouveia; Mauro Fisberg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.

Authors:  Kishan Bakrania; Thomas Yates; Alex V Rowlands; Dale W Esliger; Sarah Bunnewell; James Sanders; Melanie Davies; Kamlesh Khunti; Charlotte L Edwardson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Relationship between objectively measured intensity of physical activity and self-reported enjoyment of physical activity.

Authors:  Thea Schwaneberg; Franziska Weymar; Sabina Ulbricht; Marcus Dörr; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Neeltje van den Berg
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2017-06-09

8.  Children's physical activity during a segmented school week: results from a quasi-experimental education outside the classroom intervention.

Authors:  Mikkel Bo Schneller; Jasper Schipperijn; Glen Nielsen; Peter Bentsen
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  "What Is a Step?" Differences in How a Step Is Detected among Three Popular Activity Monitors That Have Impacted Physical Activity Research.

Authors:  Dinesh John; Alvin Morton; Diego Arguello; Kate Lyden; David Bassett
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Jairo H Migueles; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Ulf Ekelund; Christine Delisle Nyström; Jose Mora-Gonzalez; Marie Löf; Idoia Labayen; Jonatan R Ruiz; Francisco B Ortega
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.