Johannes Notni1, Katja Steiger2, Frauke Hoffmann3, Dominik Reich3, Tobias G Kapp4, Florian Rechenmacher4, Stefanie Neubauer4, Horst Kessler4, Hans-Jürgen Wester3. 1. Lehrstuhl für Pharmazeutische Radiochemie, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany johannes.notni@tum.de. 2. Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; and. 3. Lehrstuhl für Pharmazeutische Radiochemie, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany. 4. Institute for Advanced Study and Center of Integrated Protein Science, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Despite in vivo mapping of integrin αvβ3 expression being thoroughly investigated in recent years, its clinical value is still not well defined. For imaging of angiogenesis, the integrin subtype α5β1 appears to be a promising target, for which purpose we designed the PET radiopharmaceutical (68)Ga-aquibeprin. METHODS: (68)Ga-aquibeprin was obtained by click-chemistry (CuAAC) trimerization of a α5β1 integrin-binding pseudopeptide on the triazacyclononane-triphosphinate (TRAP) chelator, followed by automated (68)Ga labeling. Integrin α5β1 and αvβ3 affinities were determined in enzyme linked immune sorbent assay on immobilized integrins, using fibronectin and vitronectin, respectively, as competitors. M21 (human melanoma)-bearing severe combined immunodeficient mice were used for biodistribution, PET imaging, and determination of in vivo metabolization. The expression of α5 and β3 subunits was determined by immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections of M21 tumors. RESULTS: (68)Ga-aquibeprin shows high selectivity for integrin α5β1 (50% inhibition concentration [IC50] = 0.088 nM) over αvβ3 (IC50 = 620 nM) and a pronounced hydrophilicity (log D = -4.2). Severe combined immunodeficient mice xenografted with M21 human melanoma were found suitable for in vivo evaluation, as M21 immunohistochemistry showed not only an endothelial and strong cytoplasmatic expression of the β3 integrin subunit but also an intense expression of the α5 integrin subunit particularly in the endothelial cells of intratumoral small vessels. Ex vivo biodistribution (90 min after injection) showed high uptake in M21 tumor (2.42 ± 0.21 percentage injected dose per gram), fast renal excretion, and low background; tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle ratios were 10.6 ± 2.5 and 20.9 ± 2.4, respectively. (68)Ga-aquibeprin is stable in vivo; no metabolites were detected in mouse urine, blood serum, kidney, and liver homogenates 30 min after injection. PET imaging was performed for (68)Ga-aquibeprin and the previously described, structurally related c(RGDfK) trimer (68)Ga-avebetrin, which shows an inverse selectivity for integrin αvβ3 (IC50 = 0.22 nM) over α5β1 (IC50 = 39 nM). In vivo target specificity was proven by cross-competition studies; tumor uptake of either tracer was not affected by the coadministration of 40 nmol (∼5 mg/kg) of the respective other compound. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-aquibeprin and (68)Ga-avebetrin are recommendable for complementary mapping of integrins α5β1 and αvβ3 by PET, allowing for future studies on the role of these integrins in angiogenesis, tumor progression, metastasis, and myocardial infarct healing.
UNLABELLED: Despite in vivo mapping of integrin αvβ3 expression being thoroughly investigated in recent years, its clinical value is still not well defined. For imaging of angiogenesis, the integrin subtype α5β1 appears to be a promising target, for which purpose we designed the PET radiopharmaceutical (68)Ga-aquibeprin. METHODS: (68)Ga-aquibeprin was obtained by click-chemistry (CuAAC) trimerization of a α5β1 integrin-binding pseudopeptide on the triazacyclononane-triphosphinate (TRAP) chelator, followed by automated (68)Ga labeling. Integrin α5β1 and αvβ3 affinities were determined in enzyme linked immune sorbent assay on immobilized integrins, using fibronectin and vitronectin, respectively, as competitors. M21 (humanmelanoma)-bearing severe combined immunodeficientmice were used for biodistribution, PET imaging, and determination of in vivo metabolization. The expression of α5 and β3 subunits was determined by immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections of M21 tumors. RESULTS: (68)Ga-aquibeprin shows high selectivity for integrin α5β1 (50% inhibition concentration [IC50] = 0.088 nM) over αvβ3 (IC50 = 620 nM) and a pronounced hydrophilicity (log D = -4.2). Severe combined immunodeficientmice xenografted with M21 humanmelanoma were found suitable for in vivo evaluation, as M21 immunohistochemistry showed not only an endothelial and strong cytoplasmatic expression of the β3 integrin subunit but also an intense expression of the α5 integrin subunit particularly in the endothelial cells of intratumoral small vessels. Ex vivo biodistribution (90 min after injection) showed high uptake in M21 tumor (2.42 ± 0.21 percentage injected dose per gram), fast renal excretion, and low background; tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle ratios were 10.6 ± 2.5 and 20.9 ± 2.4, respectively. (68)Ga-aquibeprin is stable in vivo; no metabolites were detected in mouse urine, blood serum, kidney, and liver homogenates 30 min after injection. PET imaging was performed for (68)Ga-aquibeprin and the previously described, structurally related c(RGDfK) trimer (68)Ga-avebetrin, which shows an inverse selectivity for integrin αvβ3 (IC50 = 0.22 nM) over α5β1 (IC50 = 39 nM). In vivo target specificity was proven by cross-competition studies; tumor uptake of either tracer was not affected by the coadministration of 40 nmol (∼5 mg/kg) of the respective other compound. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-aquibeprin and (68)Ga-avebetrin are recommendable for complementary mapping of integrins α5β1 and αvβ3 by PET, allowing for future studies on the role of these integrins in angiogenesis, tumor progression, metastasis, and myocardial infarct healing.
Authors: Fatemeh Khodadust; Aiarpi Ezdoglian; Maarten M Steinz; Judy R van Beijnum; Gerben J C Zwezerijnen; Gerrit Jansen; Sander W Tas; Conny J van der Laken Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-25 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Ashwaq Hamid Salem Yehya; Muhammad Asif; Sven Hans Petersen; Ayappa V Subramaniam; Koji Kono; Amin Malik Shah Abdul Majid; Chern Ein Oon Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2018-03-25 Impact factor: 2.430
Authors: Simone Maschauer; Jürgen Einsiedel; Dominik Reich; Harald Hübner; Peter Gmeiner; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Olaf Prante; Johannes Notni Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2017-03-10
Authors: Johannes Notni; Florian T Gassert; Katja Steiger; Peter Sommer; Wilko Weichert; Ernst J Rummeny; Markus Schwaiger; Horst Kessler; Reinhard Meier; Melanie A Kimm Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 3.138