Khemjira Yaowakulpatana1, Somratai Vadcharavivad2, Atiporn Ingsathit3, Nutthada Areepium1, Surasak Kantachuvesiri3, Bunyong Phakdeekitcharoen3, Chonlaphat Sukasem4, Supasil Sra-Ium5, Vasant Sumethkul3, Chagriya Kitiyakara3. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. 2. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. somratai.v@pharm.chula.ac.th. 3. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 4. Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 5. Pharmacy Division, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the impacts of CYP3A5 polymorphism on tacrolimus concentration and the proportion of patients within a target therapeutic range during the first week after transplantation together with the 3-month acute rejection rate in kidney transplant patients receiving a minimized tacrolimus regimen. METHODS: A total of 164 patients participated in the study. All received oral tacrolimus twice daily starting on the day of surgery with the target pre-dose (trough) concentration of 4-8 ng/ml for prevention of allograft rejection. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 genotypes were determined. The patients were divided into CYP3A5 expressers (CYP3A5*1 allele carriers) and CYP3A5 nonexpressers (homozygous CYP3A5*3). Whole blood tacrolimus concentrations on days 3 and 7 posttransplantation and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 3-month posttransplantation were compared between groups. RESULTS: On day 3, the median (IQR) dose-and-weight-normalized trough concentration in expressers and nonexpressers were 54.61 (31.98, 78.87) and 91.80 (57.60, 130.20) ng/ml per mg/kg/day, respectively (p < 0.001). Although only 47 and 42% of expressers and nonexpressers were within the target range on day 3, approximately 60% of both groups were within the target range on day 7. Proportions of BPAR among expressers and nonexpressers were 6.0 and 7.4 %, respectively (p = 0.723). The median (IQR) times to the first rejection in CYP3A5 expressers and nonexpressers were 32 (12, 68) and 15 (12, 37) days, respectively (p = 0.410). CONCLUSIONS: Although CYP3A5 polymorphism significantly influenced the tacrolimus dose required to achieve the target concentration, the impact of CYP3A5 polymorphism on BPAR was not observed in this study.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the impacts of CYP3A5 polymorphism on tacrolimus concentration and the proportion of patients within a target therapeutic range during the first week after transplantation together with the 3-month acute rejection rate in kidney transplant patients receiving a minimized tacrolimus regimen. METHODS: A total of 164 patients participated in the study. All received oral tacrolimus twice daily starting on the day of surgery with the target pre-dose (trough) concentration of 4-8 ng/ml for prevention of allograft rejection. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 genotypes were determined. The patients were divided into CYP3A5 expressers (CYP3A5*1 allele carriers) and CYP3A5 nonexpressers (homozygous CYP3A5*3). Whole blood tacrolimus concentrations on days 3 and 7 posttransplantation and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 3-month posttransplantation were compared between groups. RESULTS: On day 3, the median (IQR) dose-and-weight-normalized trough concentration in expressers and nonexpressers were 54.61 (31.98, 78.87) and 91.80 (57.60, 130.20) ng/ml per mg/kg/day, respectively (p < 0.001). Although only 47 and 42% of expressers and nonexpressers were within the target range on day 3, approximately 60% of both groups were within the target range on day 7. Proportions of BPAR among expressers and nonexpressers were 6.0 and 7.4 %, respectively (p = 0.723). The median (IQR) times to the first rejection in CYP3A5 expressers and nonexpressers were 32 (12, 68) and 15 (12, 37) days, respectively (p = 0.410). CONCLUSIONS: Although CYP3A5 polymorphism significantly influenced the tacrolimus dose required to achieve the target concentration, the impact of CYP3A5 polymorphism on BPAR was not observed in this study.
Authors: E Thervet; M A Loriot; S Barbier; M Buchler; M Ficheux; G Choukroun; O Toupance; G Touchard; C Alberti; P Le Pogamp; B Moulin; Y Le Meur; A E Heng; J F Subra; P Beaune; C Legendre Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Hong-Guang Xie; Alastair J J Wood; Richard B Kim; C Michael Stein; Grant R Wilkinson Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Alberto M Borobia; Ivan Romero; Carlos Jimenez; Fernando Gil; Elena Ramirez; Raquel De Gracia; Fernando Escuin; Elena Gonzalez; Antonio J Carcas Sansuán Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Yvonne S Lin; Amy L S Dowling; Sean D Quigley; Federico M Farin; Jiong Zhang; Jatinder Lamba; Erin G Schuetz; Kenneth E Thummel Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: M Haas; B Sis; L C Racusen; K Solez; D Glotz; R B Colvin; M C R Castro; D S R David; E David-Neto; S M Bagnasco; L C Cendales; L D Cornell; A J Demetris; C B Drachenberg; C F Farver; A B Farris; I W Gibson; E Kraus; H Liapis; A Loupy; V Nickeleit; P Randhawa; E R Rodriguez; D Rush; R N Smith; C D Tan; W D Wallace; M Mengel Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 8.086