Noshin Koenig1, Esther Fujiwara2, M John Gill3, Christopher Power3. 1. 2Southern Alberta Clinic,University of Calgary,Calgary. 2. 3Department of Psychiatry,University of Alberta,Edmonton AB Canada. 3. 1Department of Medicine,University of Calgary,Calgary.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A large proportion of people living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) suffer from neurocognitive impairment (NCI). The causes of the NCI are multifold in HIV infection although a subset of HIV/AIDS patients are affected by the spectrum syndrome, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). We investigated the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in relation to clinical, demographic and laboratory findings as well as its ability to predict symptomatic HAND (sHAND) among patients with HIV/AIDS. METHODS: All subjects were receiving regular HIV care including CD4+ T cell counts, plasma viral load measurements, clinical evaluations and antiretroviral therapy. The diagnosis of sHAND was based upon clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological assessments. RESULTS: Among HIV-1 seropositive subjects (n=125), ethnicity, education and employment were positively correlated with their MoCA scores (p<0.05). In contrast, polypharmacy, central nervous system penetration-effectiveness (CPE) score, antiretroviral drug exposure, substance use and nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor side effects were negatively correlated with MoCA scores (p<0.05). Of note, MoCA scores were not associated with CD4 T cell nadir levels, age, peak viral load, or veterans aging cohort study index. In subjects with or without sHAND, mean MoCA scores differed (sHAND, 22.8±3.51; non-HAND 25.2±2.64) (p<0.05) with a receiver operating characteristic curve showing an area under curve of 0.71 and an optimal MoCA cut-off value of 23.5 when compared to the established diagnostic paradigm. CONCLUSIONS: MoCA scores were generally lower in this HIV/AIDS population compared to reported scores in the general population. MoCA performance was associated with multiple clinical variables but displayed limited predictive utility in detecting sHAND.
BACKGROUND: A large proportion of people living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) suffer from neurocognitive impairment (NCI). The causes of the NCI are multifold in HIV infection although a subset of HIV/AIDSpatients are affected by the spectrum syndrome, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). We investigated the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in relation to clinical, demographic and laboratory findings as well as its ability to predict symptomatic HAND (sHAND) among patients with HIV/AIDS. METHODS: All subjects were receiving regular HIV care including CD4+ T cell counts, plasma viral load measurements, clinical evaluations and antiretroviral therapy. The diagnosis of sHAND was based upon clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological assessments. RESULTS: Among HIV-1 seropositive subjects (n=125), ethnicity, education and employment were positively correlated with their MoCA scores (p<0.05). In contrast, polypharmacy, central nervous system penetration-effectiveness (CPE) score, antiretroviral drug exposure, substance use and nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor side effects were negatively correlated with MoCA scores (p<0.05). Of note, MoCA scores were not associated with CD4 T cell nadir levels, age, peak viral load, or veterans aging cohort study index. In subjects with or without sHAND, mean MoCA scores differed (sHAND, 22.8±3.51; non-HAND 25.2±2.64) (p<0.05) with a receiver operating characteristic curve showing an area under curve of 0.71 and an optimal MoCA cut-off value of 23.5 when compared to the established diagnostic paradigm. CONCLUSIONS: MoCA scores were generally lower in this HIV/AIDS population compared to reported scores in the general population. MoCA performance was associated with multiple clinical variables but displayed limited predictive utility in detecting sHAND.
Authors: Allison R Webel; Nathaniel Schreiner; Robert A Salata; Jared Friedman; Anthony I Jack; Abdus Sattar; David M Fresco; Margaret Rodriguez; Shirley Moore Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Leah H Rubin; Ava G Neijna; Qiuhu Shi; Donald R Hoover; Bani Tamraz; Kathryn Anastos; Andrew Edmonds; Margaret A Fischl; Deborah Gustafson; Pauline M Maki; Daniel Merenstein; Anandi N Sheth; Gayle Springer; David Vance; Kathleen M Weber; Anjali Sharma Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 1.723
Authors: Kendra K Radtke; Peter Bacchetti; Kathryn Anastos; Daniel Merenstein; Howard Crystal; Roksana Karim; Kathleen M Weber; Andrew Edmonds; Anandi N Sheth; Margaret A Fischl; David Vance; Ruth M Greenblatt; Leah H Rubin Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731