| Literature DB >> 26634768 |
Adam L Brandt1, Amy C Kelly1, Michelle L Green1,2, Paul Shelton3, Jan Novakofski2, Nohra E Mateus-Pinilla1,2.
Abstract
The sequence of the prion protein gene (PRNP) affects susceptibility to spongiform encephalopathies, or prion diseases in many species. In white-tailed deer, both coding and non-coding single nucleotide polymorphisms have been identified in this gene that correlate to chronic wasting disease (CWD) susceptibility. Previous studies examined individual nucleotide or amino acid mutations; here we examine all nucleotide polymorphisms and their combined effects on CWD. A 626 bp region of PRNP was examined from 703 free-ranging white-tailed deer. Deer were sampled between 2002 and 2010 by hunter harvest or government culling in Illinois and Wisconsin. Fourteen variable nucleotide positions were identified (4 new and 10 previously reported). We identified 68 diplotypes comprised of 24 predicted haplotypes, with the most common diplotype occurring in 123 individuals. Diplotypes that were found exclusively among positive or negative animals were rare, each occurring in less than 1% of the deer studied. Only one haplotype (C, odds ratio 0.240) and 2 diplotypes (AC and BC, odds ratios of 0.161 and 0.108 respectively) has significant associations with CWD resistance. Each contains mutations (one synonymous nucleotide 555C/T and one nonsynonymous nucleotide 286G/A) at positions reported to be significantly associated with reduced CWD susceptibility. Results suggest that deer populations with higher frequencies of haplotype C or diplotypes AC and BC might have a reduced risk for CWD infection--while populations with lower frequencies may have higher risk for infection. Understanding the genetic basis of CWD has improved our ability to assess herd susceptibility and direct management efforts within CWD infected areas.Entities:
Keywords: CWD; G96S; PRNP; diplotype; haplotype; prion; synonymous polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26634768 PMCID: PMC4964855 DOI: 10.1080/19336896.2015.1115179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prion ISSN: 1933-6896 Impact factor: 3.931
FIGURE 1.Map of Illinois (orange) and Wisconsin (pink), showing the study area for samples collected between 2002 and 2010. Samples were collected from all counties in gray by hunter harvest or government culling. Counties within the CWD infection area (at least 5 confirmed cases of CWD during the sample period) are darkly shaded; statistical analyses of CWD susceptibility were restricted to individuals originating from these locations thus increasing the probability of disease exposure. Number of samples from each county is indicated below the county name.
Variable nucleotide positions for reconstructed haplotypes within the 629bp region of the PRNP gene
| C | C | T | A | G | G | C | C | — | 0.30 | 76 | 282 | 70 | |||||||
| C | C | T | A | G | G | C | T | 1 | 0.25 | 75 | 219 | 55 | |||||||
| C | C | T | A | G | G | C | T | 2 | 0.16 | 9 | 173 | 47 | |||||||
| C | T | T | A | G | G | C | C | 1 | 0.12 | 30 | 110 | 28 | |||||||
| C | C | T | A | G | G | T | C | 1 | 0.05 | 6 | 45 | 15 | |||||||
| T | C | T | A | G | G | C | C | 2 | 0.03 | 2 | 38 | 9 | |||||||
| T | C | T | A | G | G | C | C | 1 | 0.03 | 5 | 33 | 3 | |||||||
| C | C | T | A | A | G | C | T | 2 | 0.01 | 0 | 13 | 6 | |||||||
| C | C | A | A | G | G | C | T | 3 | 0.01 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |||||||
| C | C | T | G | G | G | C | C | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 8 | 0 | |||||||
| T | C | T | A | G | G | C | C | 2 | < 0.01 | 0 | 4 | 1 | |||||||
| C | C | T | A | G | G | C | C | 1 | < 0.01 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||
| C | C | T | A | G | G | C | C | 1 | < 0.01 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| T | C | T | A | G | G | C | C | 3 | < 0.01 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| T | T | T | A | G | G | C | C | 2 | < 0.01 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |||||||
| C | C | T | A | G | G | C | C | 1 | < 0.01 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |||||||
| C | C | T | A | G | G | C | T | 3 | < 0.01 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||||||
| C | T | T | A | G | G | C | T | 2 | < 0.01 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| C | C | T | A | G | G | C | T | 3 | < 0.01 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||||||
| C | T | T | A | G | A | C | C | 2 | < 0.01 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||||||
| C | T | T | A | G | G | C | C | 2 | < 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||
| C | T | T | A | G | G | C | C | 2 | < 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||
| T | C | T | A | G | G | C | C | 2 | < 0.01 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||||||
| T | C | A | A | G | G | C | C | 3 | < 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Haplotypes were generated from unphased sequences in PHASE v2.1. Nucleotide positions are based on Kelly et al. 2008. Non-synonyous mutations are in bold face, and the 4 novel mutations are indicated by asterisks. Nm is the number of nucleotide deviations from haplotype A, which is the most abundant haplotype among all sampled deer. is the frequency of haplotypes among all sampled deer. The number of haplotype copies (N=1406 ) are shown among (+) CWD positive deer, (−) CWD negative deer, and (NT) deer that were not tested for CWD.
Disease association for unique PRNP haplotypes among deer within the CWD infection area
| Haplotype | (+) | (−) | P-val | Odds Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.34 | 76 | 87 | — | — | |
| 0.31 | 75 | 74 | 0.513 | — | |
| 0.11 | 9 | 43 | < 0.001 | 0.240 (0.104–0.503) | |
| 0.11 | 30 | 22 | 0.166 | — | |
| 0.05 | 6 | 17 | 0.070 | — | |
| 0.02 | 2 | 9 | 0.086 | — | |
| 0.02 | 5 | 5 | 0.836 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 2 | 0 | 0.992 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 1 | 3 | 0.408 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 0 | 2 | 0.992 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 0 | 2 | 0.992 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 0 | 1 | 0.995 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 1 | 2 | 0.651 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.924 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 2 | 0 | 0.992 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 0 | 1 | 0.995 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 0 | 1 | 0.995 | — |
Haplotypes were generated from unphased sequences in PHASE v2.1. To avoid spurious results, this analysis includes only deer from the CWD infection area (counties with at least 5 confirmed cases of CWD). Only haplotypes that occurred in the CWD infection area are shown. f is the frequency of each haplotype. The number of haplotype copies (N=480 ) are shown among (+) CWD positive deer and (−) CWD negative deer. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (parentheses) are shown for significant parameters (P < 0.05) determined by logistic regression against haplotype A, as it occurs most frequently among the sampled deer.
Frequency of PRNP diplotypes among all sampled white-tailed deer
| Diplotype | (+) | (−) | NT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.17 | 32 | 73 | 18 | |
| 0.10 | 13 | 49 | 7 | |
| 0.08 | 2 | 40 | 14 | |
| 0.08 | 1 | 38 | 14 | |
| 0.07 | 8 | 32 | 10 | |
| 0.06 | 12 | 26 | 5 | |
| 0.06 | 12 | 22 | 6 | |
| 0.04 | 1 | 25 | 4 | |
| 0.03 | 1 | 18 | 3 | |
| 0.03 | 3 | 10 | 6 | |
| 0.02 | 2 | 9 | 4 | |
| 0.02 | 4 | 10 | 1 | |
| 0.02 | 1 | 10 | 1 | |
| 0.02 | 1 | 10 | 0 | |
| 0.02 | 1 | 8 | 2 | |
| 0.01 | 3 | 7 | 0 | |
| 0.01 | 0 | 9 | 0 | |
| 0.01 | 1 | 7 | 1 | |
| < 0.01 | 7 | 71 | 28 |
Diplotypes were determined from unique PRNP sequences. f is the frequency of diplotypes among all sampled deer. The number of deer (N=703 ) with each diplotype are shown for (+) CWD positive deer, (−) CWD negative deer, and (NT) deer that were not tested for CWD. Fifty diplotypes were considered rare, each occurring in less than 1% of the total sampled deer and are summarized collectively.
Disease association with PRNP diplotypes among white-tailed deer within the CWD infection area
| Diplotype | (+) | (−) | P-val | Odds Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.26 | 32 | 31 | — | — | |
| 0.12 | 13 | 15 | 0.701 | — | |
| 0.08 | 12 | 8 | 0.474 | — | |
| 0.08 | 12 | 7 | 0.346 | — | |
| 0.06 | 2 | 12 | 0.023 | 0.161 (0.024–0.654) | |
| 0.06 | 8 | 6 | 0.668 | — | |
| 0.04 | 1 | 9 | 0.040 | 0.108 (0.006–0.623) | |
| 0.03 | 3 | 4 | 0.691 | — | |
| 0.03 | 1 | 5 | 0.144 | — | |
| 0.02 | 1 | 4 | 0.216 | — | |
| 0.02 | 3 | 2 | 0.693 | — | |
| 0.02 | 1 | 4 | 0.216 | — | |
| 0.02 | 4 | 1 | 0.237 | — | |
| 0.02 | 2 | 2 | 0.975 | — | |
| 0.02 | 1 | 3 | 0.339 | — | |
| 0.01 | 2 | 0 | 0.995 | — | |
| 0.01 | 2 | 0 | 0.995 | — | |
| 0.01 | 0 | 2 | 0.995 | — | |
| 0.01 | 0 | 2 | 0.995 | — | |
| 0.01 | 0 | 2 | 0.995 | — | |
| 0.01 | 0 | 2 | 0.995 | — | |
| 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.982 | — | |
| 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.982 | — | |
| < 0.01 | 3 | 12 | > 0.050 | — |
Diplotypes were determined from unique PRNP sequences. To avoid spurious results, this analysis includes only deer from the CWD infection area (counties with at least 5 confirmed cases of CWD). Only diplotypes that occurred in the CWD infection area are shown. f is the frequency of each diplotype. The number of deer (N=240 ) with each diplotype are shown for (+) CWD positive deer and (-) CWD negative deer. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (parentheses) are shown for significant parameters (P < 0.050) determined by logistic regression against diplotype AB, as it occurs most frequently among the sampled deer. Rare diplotypes (N=15 ) each occurred in less than 1% of deer in this reduced data set and are summarized collectively.
Confirmation of PRNP nucleotide positions 285 and 286 (amino acid positions 95 and 96) previously reported as significant for reduced CWD susceptibility
| Locus | Nt | AA | (+) | (−) | P-val | Odds Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 285 | A | Q | 0.975 | 208 | 260 | — | — |
| C | H | 0.025 | 2 | 10 | 0.076 | — | |
| 286 | G | G | 0.879 | 198 | 224 | — | — |
| A | S | 0.121 | 12 | 46 | < 0.001 | 0.295 (0.146–0.556) | |
| 285 | AA | 0.954 | 103 | 126 | — | — | |
| AC | QH | 0.041 | 2 | 8 | 0.139 | — | |
| CC | HH | < 0.01 | 0 | 1 | 0.987 | — | |
| 286 | GG | GG | 0.796 | 95 | 96 | — | — |
| GA | GS | 0.167 | 8 | 32 | 0.001 | 0.253 (0.104–0.552) | |
| AA | SS | 0.038 | 2 | 7 | 0.127 | — | |
| 285/286 | AA/GG | QQ/GG | 0.758 | 93 | 89 | — | — |
| AA/GA | QQ/GS | 0.163 | 8 | 31 | < 0.001 | 0.247 (0.101–0.542) | |
| AA/AA | QQ/SS | 0.033 | 2 | 6 | 0.169 | — | |
| AC/GG | QH/GG | 0.033 | 2 | 6 | 0.169 | — | |
| AC/GA | QH/GS | 0.004 | 0 | 1 | 0.991 | — | |
| AC/AA | QH/SS | 0.004 | 0 | 1 | 0.991 | — | |
| CC/GG | HH/GG | 0.004 | 0 | 1 | 0.991 | — | |
To avoid spurious results, this analysis includes only deer from the core CWD infection area (counties with at least 5 confirmed cases of CWD). Nt is the nucleotide at each position, and AA is the resulting amino acid for each nucleotide mutation. f is the frequency of each variable. The number of alleles (N=480) or genotypes (N=240) is shown for (+)CWD positive deer and (−)CWD negative deer. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (parentheses) are shown for significant parameters (P < 0.05) determined by logistic regression.