Literature DB >> 26633870

Acute Myocardial Infarction, Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, and Mortality: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis Covering Seven European Countries.

Terje P Hagen1, Unto Häkkinen1,2, Eva Belicza3, Giovanni Fatore4, Fanny Goude5.   

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients have increased substantially in the last 12-15 years because of its clinical effectiveness. The expansion of PCI treatment for AMI patients raises two questions: How did PCI utilization rates vary across European regions, and which healthcare system and regional characteristic variables correlated with the utilization rate? Were the differences in use of PCI associated with differences in outcome, operationalized as 30-day mortality? We obtained our results from a dataset based on the administrative information systems of the populations of seven European countries. PCI rates were highest in the Netherlands, followed by Sweden and Hungary. The probability of receiving PCI was highest in regions with their own PCI facilities and in healthcare systems with activity-based reimbursement systems. Thirty-day mortality rates differed considerably between the countries with the highest rates in Hungary, Scotland, and Finland. Mortality was lowest in Sweden and Norway. The associations between PCI and mortality were remarkable in all age groups and across most countries. Despite extensive risk adjustment, we interpret the associations both as effects of selection and treatments. We observed a lower effect of PCI in the higher age groups in Hungary.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H42; I12; I14; I18; acute myocardial infarction; comparative effectiveness study; mortality; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26633870     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  4 in total

1.  Mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock post-acute myocardial infarction-a decade of lessons.

Authors:  Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Sudeep Das De; Francesco Nappi; Ahmed Al-Adhami; Yasser Hegazy; Jonathan Dalzell; Harikrishna Doshi; Andrew Sinclair; Philip Curry; Mark Petrie; Colin Berry; Nawwar Al-Attar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Variation in revascularisation use and outcomes of patients in hospital with acute myocardial infarction across six high income countries: cross sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Laura A Hatfield; Pieter Bakx; Amitava Banerjee; Christina Fu; Michal Gordon; Renaud Heine; Nicole Huang; Dennis Ko; Lisa M Lix; Victor Novack; Laura Pasea; Feng Qiu; Therese A Stukel; Carin Uyl de Groot; Lin Yan; Bruce Landon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  Treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the sub-arctic region of Norway. Do we offer an equal quality of care?

Authors:  J Norum; A Hovland; L Balteskard; T Trovik; B Haug; F H Hansen; S Alterskjær; P Madsen; F Olsen
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.228

4.  Nurses' perceptions of patient participation in the myocardial infarction pathway.

Authors:  Elise Kvalsund Bårdsgjerde; Bodil J Landstad; Torstein Hole; Magne Nylenna; Kari Hanne Gjeilo; Marit Kvangarsnes
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-06-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.