| Literature DB >> 26633337 |
Thao Nguyen1, Mario Aparicio2, Mahmoud A Saleh3.
Abstract
The triacylglycerol (TAG) structure and the regio-stereospecific distribution of fatty acids (FA) of seed oils from most of the Apiaceae family are not well documented. The TAG structure ultimately determines the final physical properties of the oils and the position of FAs in the TAG molecule affects the digestion; absorption and metabolism; and physical and technological properties of TAGs. Fixed oils from the fruits of dill (Anethum graveolens), caraway (Carum carvi), cumin (Cuminum cyminum), coriander (Coriandrum sativum), anise (Pimpinella anisum), carrot (Daucus carota), celery (Apium graveolens), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), and Khella (Ammi visnaga), all from the Apiaceae family, were extracted at room temperature in chloroform/methanol (2:1 v/v) using percolators. Crude lipids were fractionated by solid phase extraction to separate neutral triacylglycerols (TAGs) from other lipids components. Neutral TAGs were subjected to transesterification process to convert them to their corresponding fatty acids methyl esters (FAMES) using 1% boron trifluoride (BF₃) in methanol. FAMES were analyzed by gas chromatography-quadrupole time of flight (GC-QTOF) mass spectrometry. Triglycerides were analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time of flight (LC-QTOF) mass spectrometry. Petroselinic acid was the major fatty acid in all samples ranging from 57% of the total fatty acids in caraway up to 82% in fennel. All samples contained palmitic (16:0), palmitoleic (C16:1n-9), stearic (C18:0), petroselinic (C18:1n-12), linoleic (C18:2n-6), linolinic (18:3n-3), and arachidic (C20:0) acids. TAG were analyzed using LC-QTOF for accurate mass identification and mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (MS/MS) techniques for regiospesific elucidation of the identified TAGs. Five major TAGs were detected in all samples but with different relative concentrations in all of the tested samples. Several other TAGs were detected as minor components and were present in some samples and absence in the others. Regiospecific analysis showed a non-random fatty acids distribution. Petroselinic acid was predominantly located at the sn-1 and sn-3 positions.Entities:
Keywords: QTOF; lipids; petroselinic acid; regiospecific; seed oil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26633337 PMCID: PMC4881421 DOI: 10.3390/molecules201219779
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Relative percentage composition of FAMES in each of the nine Apiaceae oil samples.
| Fatty Acids | Dill | Caraway | Cumin | Coriander | Anise | Carrot | Celery | Fennel | Khella |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C16:0 | 5.79 ± 0.41 | 4.35 ± 0.51 | 4.67 ± 0.11 | 4.25 ± 0.10 | 4.75 ± 0.11 | 5.29 ± 0.15 | 8.51 ± 0.98 | 4.71 ± 0.12 | 4.92 ± 0.09 |
| C16:1 | 0.52 ± 0.05 | 0.89 ± 0.09 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | 0.62 ± 0.09 | 0.38 ± 0.07 | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 0.26 ± 0.01 |
| C16:1 | nd * | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.64 ± 0.10 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.01 |
| C18:0 | 1.61 ± 0.08 | 2.03 ± 0.11 | nd * | nd * | 1.17 ± 0.25 | 0.91 ± 0.11 | 2.03 ± 0.04 | 1.23 ± 0.09 | 1.08 ± 0.11 |
| 6ZC18:1 | 79.91 ± 1.16 | 57.69 ± 0.91 | 61.83 ± 1.97 | 79.78 ± 2.61 | 66.26 ± 1.81 | 81.20 ± 2.41 | 65.79 ± 1.81 | 81.95 ± 2.41 | 74.95 ± 2.15 |
| 9ZC18:1 | nd * | 1.10 ± 0.05 | 1.40 ± 0.04 | nd* | 1.47 | nd * | nd * | nd * | nd * |
| C18:2 | 10.80 ± 0.47 | 31.13 ± 0.81 | 30.44 ± 0.91 | 14.85 ± 0.31 | 24.58 ± 0.12 | 10.02 ± 0.11 | 21.65 ± 0.65 | 10.97 ± 0.31 | 16.68 ± 0.16 |
| C18:3 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 2.05 ± 0.05 | 0.61 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.75 ± 0.09 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 1.01 ± 0.09 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 1.41 ± 0.11 |
| C20:0 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 0.68 ± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | nd * | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.07 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 |
| % Yield § | 20.5 | 14.3 | 23.4 | 16.8 | 15.3 | 17.9 | 9.8 | 14.6 | 12.6 |
nd * is not detected. Yield § based on recovered neutral lipids.
Figure 1Electron ionization (EI) Total ion chromatogram of caraway FAMES.
Figure 2Proposed fragmentation pattern in the EI mode for differentiation between Z6 and Z9 18:1 fatty acids.
Possible numbers of structural isomers and region isomers of the predicted TAGs.
| Accurate mass (Possible Isomers) | Suspected Isomers | Regioisomers |
|---|---|---|
| 901.7256 (186 isomers) | 18:1Z9/18:2/18:3 | 6 |
| 18:1Z6/18:2/18:3 | 6 | |
| 18:0/18:3/18:3 | 3 | |
| 18:2/18:2/18:2 | 1 | |
| 903.7412 (405 isomers) | 18:1Z9/18:2/18:2 | 3 |
| 18:1Z6/18:2/18:2 | 3 | |
| 18:0/18:2/18:3 | 6 | |
| 18:1Z9/18:1Z9/18:3 | 3 | |
| 18:1Z6/18:1Z6/18:3 | 3 | |
| 18:1Z9/18:1Z6/18:3 | 6 | |
| 905.7569 (405) | 18:0/18:1Z9/18:3 | 6 |
| 18:0/18:1Z6/18:3 | 6 | |
| 16:1/18:3/20:0 | 6 | |
| 18:0/18:2/18:2 | 3 | |
| 18:1Z6/18:1Z6/18:2 | 3 | |
| 18:1Z9/18:1Z9/18:2 | 3 | |
| 18:1Z9/18:1Z6/18:2 | 6 | |
| 907.7725 (342) | 18:0/18:0/18:3 | 3 |
| 18:1Z6/18:1Z6/18:1Z6 | 1 | |
| 18:1Z9/18:1Z9/18:1Z9 | 1 | |
| 18:1Z9/18:1Z9/18:1Z6 | 3 | |
| 18:1Z9/18:1Z6/18:1Z6 | 3 | |
| 18:0/18:1Z9/18:2 | 6 | |
| 18:0/18:1Z6/18:2 | 6 | |
| 16:0/18:3/20:0 | 6 | |
| 16:1/18:2/20:0 | 6 | |
| Total | ||
| 909.7882 (291) | 18:0/18:1 Z9/18:1Z9 | 3 |
| 18:0/18:1 Z6/18:1Z6 | 3 | |
| 18:0/18:1 Z9/18:1Z6 | 6 | |
| 18:0:18:0/18:2 | 3 | |
| 16:0:18:2/20:0 | 6 | |
| 16:1:18:1Z9/20:0 | 6 | |
| 16:1:18:1Z6/20:0 | 6 | |
Figure 3Total ion chromatogram of the nine examined samples.
Figure 4Natural isotope abundance for the five major TAG molecular ions.
Percentage relative concentration of the detected major molecular ions in each sample.
| Identified TAGs | Dill | Caraway | Cumin | Coriander | Anise | Carrot | Celery | Fennel | Khella |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG18:2/18:2/18:2 C57H98O6Na | 6.17 | 7.78 | 0.68 | 1.25 | 1.85 | 2.01 | nd * | nd * | |
| 901.7256 | |||||||||
| 4.20 min | |||||||||
| TG18:1/18:2/18:2 C57H100O6Na | 3.31 | 16.24 | 20.15 | 10.16 | 2.76 | ||||
| 903.7412 | |||||||||
| 4.63 min | |||||||||
| TG18:0/18:3/18:2 C57H100O6Na | 0.87 | 12.75 | 5.27 | 0.86 | |||||
| 903.7412 | |||||||||
| 4.63 min | |||||||||
| TG18:1/18:1/18:2 C57H102O6Na | 29.71 | 37.88 | 25.99 | ||||||
| 905.7569 | |||||||||
| 5.13 min | |||||||||
| TG18:1/18:2/18:1 C57H102O6Na | 22.36 | 28.38 | 25.41 | 24.38 | 17.68 | 26.33 | |||
| 905.7569 | |||||||||
| 5.13 min | |||||||||
| TG18:1/18:1/18:1 C57H104O6Na | 58.40 | 24.73 | 25.34 | 62.72 | 31.22 | 49.25 | 37.17 | 40.04 | 51.95 |
| 907.7725 | |||||||||
| 5.66 min | |||||||||
| TG18:0/18:1/18:1 C57H106O6Na | 3.27 | 0.63 | 0.32 | 2.64 | 5.34 | 3.71 | nd * | ||
| 909.7882 | |||||||||
| TG18:1/18:0/18:1 C57H106O6Na | 5.06 | 0.79 | nd * | ||||||
| 909.7882 | |||||||||
| 6.50 min |
nd * is not detected.
Minor identified TAGs and their distribution in the nine tested Apiaceae seeds.
| TAGs | Dill | Caraway | Cumin | Coriander | Anise | Carrot | Celery | Fennel | Khella |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG16:0/16:0/16:0 C51H98O6Na | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||
| 829.7256 | |||||||||
| 4.20 min | |||||||||
| TG16:0/18:2/18:2 C55H98O6Na | x | x | x | x | |||||
| 877.7248 | |||||||||
| 4.73 min | |||||||||
| TG16:1/18:1/18:2 C55H98O6Na | x | x | |||||||
| 877.7248 | |||||||||
| 4.73 min | |||||||||
| TG16:1/18:0/18:3 C55H98O6Na | x | x | |||||||
| 877.7248 | |||||||||
| 4.73 min | |||||||||
| TG18:3/18:3/18:3 C57H92O6Na | x | x | x | x | |||||
| 895.6786 | |||||||||
| 3.73 min | |||||||||
| TG16:1/18:0/20:0 C57H108O6Na | x | ||||||||
| 911.8038 | |||||||||
| 6.50 min | |||||||||
| TG18:0/18:0/18:1 C57H108O6Na | x | ||||||||
| 911.8038 | |||||||||
| 6.50 min | |||||||||
| TG18:0/18:0/18:0 C57H110O6Na | x | x | x | ||||||
| 913.8195 | |||||||||
| 7.12 min | |||||||||
| TG18:1/18:1/20:0 C59H110O6Na | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| 937.8186 | |||||||||
| 6.60 min | |||||||||
| TG18:2/20:0/20:0 C61H114O6Na | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
| 965.8508 | |||||||||
| 6.73 min |
Figure 5Electrospray Ionization (ESI) positive fragmentation pattern of the TAG 909.7759 molecular ion according to the MS/MS experiments.