Literature DB >> 26633060

Assessment of Model Chemistries for Noncovalent Interactions.

Yan Zhao1, Donald G Truhlar1.   

Abstract

In the present study, we report tests of 57 model chemistry methods for calculating binding energies of 31 diverse van der Waals molecules arranged in five databases of noncovalent interaction energies. The model chemistries studied include wave function theory (WFT), density functional theory (DFT), and combined wave function-density-functional-theory (CWFDFT), and they include methods whose computational effort scales (for large systems) as N(7), N(6), N(5), and N(4), where N is the number of atoms. The model chemistries include 2 CWFDFT N(7) models, 4 multilevel WFT N(7) models, 5 single-level WFT N(7) models, 4 CWFDFT N(6) models, 3 multilevel WFT N(6) models, 11 single-level WFT N(6) models, 5 CWFDFT N(5) models, 10 single-level WFTN(5) models, 4 multilevel WFT N(5) models, 4 single-level DFT N(4) models, and 5 single-level WFT N(4) models. We draw the following conclusions based on the mean absolute errors in 31 noncovalent binding energies:  (1) MCG3-MPW gives the best performance for predicting the binding energies of these noncovalent complexes. (2) MCQCISD-MPWB and MCQCISD-MPW are the best two N(6) methods. (3) M05-2X is the best single-level method for these noncovalent complexes. These four methods should facilitate useful calculations on a wide variety of practical applications involving hydrogen bonding, charge-transfer complexes, dipole interactions, weak (dispersion-like) interactions, and π···π stacking. If a user is interested in only a particular type of noncovalent interactions, though, some other methods, may be recommended for especially favorable performance/cost ratios. For example, BMC-CCSD has an outstanding performance for hydrogen bonding, and PWB6K has an outstanding cost-adjusted performance for dipole interaction calculations on very large systems. We also show that M05-2X performs well for interactions of amino acid pair residues.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 26633060     DOI: 10.1021/ct060044j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  19 in total

1.  Metal oxide nanoparticle growth on graphene via chemical activation with atomic oxygen.

Authors:  James E Johns; Justice M P Alaboson; Sameer Patwardhan; Christopher R Ryder; George C Schatz; Mark C Hersam
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Proton transfer reaction and intermolecular interactions in associates of 2,5-dihydroxy-1,8-naphthyridine.

Authors:  Borys Ośmiałowski
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Probing deoxysugar conformational preference: A comprehensive computational study investigating the effects of deoxygenation.

Authors:  Alison E Vickman; Nicola L B Pohl
Journal:  Carbohydr Res       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  The mechanism of Menshutkin reaction in gas and solvent phases from the perspective of reaction electronic flux.

Authors:  Santanab Giri; Ricardo Inostroza-Rivera; Bárbara Herrera; Alvaro S Núñez; Fernando Lund; Alejandro Toro-Labbé
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Theoretical investigations on the enhancing effect of the cation-π interaction on the halogen bond in the M∙∙∙HCCX∙∙∙NH₃ (M = Li⁺, Na⁺, Cu⁺, Ag⁺, Au⁺; X = Cl, Br) complexes.

Authors:  Dianguo Geng
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  2-Amino-5-(3,4-dimethoxybenzylidene)-1-methylimidazol-4(5H)-one N,N-dimethylformamide monosolvate.

Authors:  Laura M Tvedte; Kenneth L Smith; Eric V Patterson; Russell G Baughman
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  The influence of secondary interactions on complex stability and double proton transfer reaction in 2-[1H]-pyridone/2-hydroxypyridine dimers.

Authors:  Borys Ośmiałowski; Robert Dobosz
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Effects of varying the 6-position oxidation state of hexopyranoses: a systematic comparative computational analysis of 48 monosaccharide stereoisomers.

Authors:  Alison E Vickman; Daniel C Ashley; Mu-Hyun Baik; Nicola L B Pohl
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  The X∙∙∙Au interactions in the CF₃X (X = Cl, Br)∙∙∙Au(n) (n = 2, 3, and 4) complexes.

Authors:  Qiang Zhao
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Theoretical Evidence for the Stronger Ability of Thymine to Disperse SWCNT than Cytosine and Adenine: self-stacking of DNA bases vs their cross-stacking with SWCNT.

Authors:  Yixuan Wang
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.