Literature DB >> 26632951

Five- and 10-Year Cause-Specific Survival Rates in Carcinoma of the Minor Salivary Gland.

H Michael Baddour1, Stacey A Fedewa2, Amy Y Chen1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Previous studies of prognostic factors of carcinoma of the minor salivary gland (MSG) have been limited to single-institution studies and small case series. Thus, limited data are available to guide the head and neck oncologist in counseling patients on the prognosis and management of these malignant neoplasms.
OBJECTIVE: To examine 5- and 10-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rates of MSG carcinomas across all histologic subtypes and head and neck tumor subsites. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective, population-based study using National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2009. The study included 5334 patients diagnosed as having MSG carcinoma and registered in the SEER database. Patients without follow-up, diagnostic confirmation, and/or race designation were excluded from the analysis (131 [2.4%]). Final follow-up was completed on December 31, 2009, and data were analyzed from August 5, 2013, to July 1, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Five- and 10-year CSS rates for US patients with MSG carcinoma. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.
RESULTS: Among the 5334 patients with MSG carcinoma included, the most common histologic subtypes included mucoepidermoid carcinoma (1568 [29.4%]), adenoid cystic carcinoma (1228 [23.0%]), and adenocarcinoma (1313 [24.6%]). The most frequent sites of primary tumor were the oral cavity (3132 [58.7%]) and pharynx (1130 [21.2%]). Five-year CSS rate was significantly worse for MSG malignant neoplasms located in the larynx (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.67-3.50) and nasal cavity and/or paranasal sinus (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.29-2.32). Being older than 75 years was associated with a significantly worse 5-year CSS rate (HR, 2.88; 95% CI, 2.05-4.06). Compared with no surgery, local tumor destruction (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.64), partial surgery (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.47), and total surgery (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.74) were each found to be a significant positive prognostic factor. No differences were observed in the 5-year hazard of death for race/ethnicity, sex, diagnosis year, or socioeconomic status, and 10-year adjusted HRs were similar to the 5-year patterns. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study, to date, represents the largest US survival analysis of carcinoma of the MSG. Prognosis is associated with histologic subtype, tumor subsite, age at diagnosis, grade, and surgical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26632951     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  8 in total

1.  Nothing to Spit At.

Authors:  Nafiseh Hashemi; Shahreen Billah; Christian P Conderman; Ibrahim Alava; Emilio P Supsupin; Patricia Chevez-Barrios; Ore-Ofe O Adesina
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Minor salivary gland tumors of the head and neck-Memorial Sloan Kettering experience: Incidence and outcomes by site and histological type.

Authors:  Ashley J Hay; Jocelyn Migliacci; Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Marlena McGill; Snehal Patel; Ian Ganly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Prognostic factors and occult nodal disease in mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: An analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Mark A Ellis; Evan M Graboyes; Terry A Day; David M Neskey
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Nomogram Predicting Cancer-Specific Death in Parotid Carcinoma: a Competing Risk Analysis.

Authors:  Xiancai Li; Mingbin Hu; Weiguo Gu; Dewu Liu; Jinhong Mei; Shaoqing Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Prognostic factors and overall survival in a 15-year followup of patients with malignant salivary gland tumors: a retrospective analysis of 193 patients.

Authors:  Osias Vieira de Oliveira Filho; Talita Jordânia Rocha do Rêgo; Felipe Herbert de Oliveira Mendes; Thinali Sousa Dantas; Maria do Perpétuo Socorro Saldanha Cunha; Cássia Emanuella Nóbrega Malta; Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva; Fabrício Bitu Sousa
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-04

Review 6.  Basal cell adenocarcinoma of the nasopharyngeal minor salivary glands: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jia Jin; Xia-Yun He
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Prognostic value of primary tumor surgery in minor salivary-gland carcinoma patients with distant metastases at diagnosis: first evidence from a SEER-based study.

Authors:  Xiao Shi; Nai-Si Huang; Rong-Liang Shi; Wen-Jun Wei; Yu-Long Wang; Qing-Hai Ji
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  ELMO3 - a Negative Prognostic Marker in Minor Salivary Gland Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ulana Kotowski; Lorenz Kadletz; Sven Schneider; Felicitas Oberndorfer; Boban M Erovic; Matthaeus Ch Grasl; Claudia Lill; Gregor Heiduschka
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.201

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.