Literature DB >> 26632782

Effect of Enrichment Devices on Aggression in Manipulated Nude Mice.

Cynthia R Lockworth1, Sun-Jin Kim2, Jun Liu3, Shana L Palla4, Suzanne L Craig5.   

Abstract

Agonistic behavior in group-housed male mice is a recurring problem in many animal research facilities. Common management procedures, such as the removal of aggressors, are moderately successful but often fail, owing to recurrence of aggressive behavior among cagemates. Studies have incorporated enrichment devices to attenuate aggression, but such devices have had mixed results. However, these studies did not include research manipulations when assessing the benefits of various enrichment devices. We obtained 100 male athymic nude mice and studied the efficacy of various enrichment devices, including cotton squares, paper rolls, shredded paper, nylon bones, and a mouse house and wheel combination in the reduction of fighting during an ongoing study that involved randomization followed by prostate and intratibial injections. Groups were evaluated according to a numerical grading system for wound assessment. Examination of the data revealed that the enrichment devices had no effect on the presence of wounds, thus none of the devices tested affected fighting in nude mice. However, when mice began experimental use, fight wounds increased significantly at cage change and after randomization, reflecting a disruption of existing social hierarchies. Therefore, in the context of an actual research study that involves common manipulations, the specific enrichment device had less effect on aggression in male nude mice than did the destruction and reconstruction of social structures within each group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26632782      PMCID: PMC4671788     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  48 in total

Review 1.  Ideal homes? Housing effects on rodent brain and behaviour.

Authors:  H Würbel
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Rearing environmental enrichment in two inbred strains of mice: 1. Effects on emotional reactivity.

Authors:  P Chapillon; C Manneché; C Belzung; J Caston
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Evaluation of environmental enrichment for laboratory mice.

Authors:  H A van de Weerd
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.320

4.  The influence of the location of a nest box in an individually ventilated cage on the preference of mice to use it.

Authors:  Nikolaos G Kostomitsopoulos; Euthimios Paronis; Paul Alexakos; Evangelos Balafas; Pascalle van Loo; Vera Baumans
Journal:  J Appl Anim Welf Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.440

5.  Environmental enrichment does not disrupt standardisation of animal experiments.

Authors:  Hanno Würbel
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.043

6.  Cage design reduces emotionality in mice.

Authors:  A S Chamove
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Genetic differences influencing behavioral temperature regulation in small mammals. I. Nesting by Mus musculus.

Authors:  C B Lynch; J P Hegmann
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Effect of cage population density on plasma corticosterone and peripheral lymphocyte populations of laboratory mice.

Authors:  X Peng; C M Lang; C K Drozdowicz; B M Ohlsson-Wilhelm
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 9.  Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: requirements of rodents, rabbits, and research.

Authors:  Vera Baumans
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2005

10.  Separating the effects of shelter from additional cage enhancements for group-housed BALB/cJ mice.

Authors:  Brentt J Swetter; Christie P Karpiak; J Timothy Cannon
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  7 in total

1.  Impact of peripheral immune status on central molecular responses to facial nerve axotomy.

Authors:  D O Setter; E M Runge; N D Schartz; F M Kennedy; B L Brown; K P McMillan; W M Miller; K M Shah; M M Haulcomb; V M Sanders; K J Jones
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 7.217

2.  Effect of Environmental Enrichment on Aggression in BALB/cJ and BALB/cByJ Mice Monitored by Using an Automated System.

Authors:  Jareca M Giles; Julia W Whitaker; Sheryl S Moy; Craig A Fletcher
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  The effect of early life experience, environment, and genetic factors on spontaneous home-cage aggression-related wounding in male C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Brianna N Gaskill; Aurora M Stottler; Joseph P Garner; Christina W Winnicker; Guy B Mulder; Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 12.625

4.  Tunnel use facilitates handling of ICR mice and decreases experimental variation.

Authors:  Yu Nakamura; Kaoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Cage aggression in group-housed laboratory male mice: an international data crowdsourcing project.

Authors:  Katie Lidster; Kathryn Owen; William J Browne; Mark J Prescott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The effect of group size, age and handling frequency on inter-male aggression in CD 1 mice.

Authors:  Paulin Jirkof; Natalie Bratcher; Letty Medina; Donna Strasburg; Paige Ebert; Brianna N Gaskill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The epidemiology of fighting in group-housed laboratory mice.

Authors:  Jacob H Theil; Jamie Ahloy-Dallaire; Elin M Weber; Brianna N Gaskill; Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning; Stephen A Felt; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.