Literature DB >> 26632655

Clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Zhongyu Liu1, Xiuli Li2, Ye Tao3, Weiping Li2, Yizhuo Yang2, Yuanqing Yao4, Tongyu Zhu5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNRH) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
METHODS: 120 patients with stage Ib2 and IIa2 cervical cancer were treated with surgery combined with preoperative NACT in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, PLA General Hospital. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to surgery type: patients who underwent LNRH were assigned to one group, while the second group included patients who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) after administration of NACT. We compared these patients' general clinical information and surgical characteristics, and we assessed their bladder function and intestinal function recovery by questionnaire.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the groups in patients' age or surgical characteristics. The mean duration of postoperative catheterization in the LNRH group was shorter than in the LRH group (P < 0.001). The intestinal and bladder function of patients in the LNRH group also recovered better than that of patients in the LRH group.
CONCLUSION: LNRH is a feasible and safe procedure for LACC after NACT and reduces surgical complications.
Copyright © 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic; Locally advanced cervical cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Nerve-sparing; Radical hysterectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26632655     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  2 in total

1.  Morbidity after surgical management of cervical cancer in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma R Allanson; Aime Powell; Max Bulsara; Hong Lim Lee; Lynette Denny; Yee Leung; Paul Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.

Authors:  Lei Li; Shuiqing Ma; Xianjie Tan; Sen Zhong; Ming Wu
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.339

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.