| Literature DB >> 26632326 |
Kata Horvati1, Szilvia Bősze1, Hannah P Gideon2, Bernadett Bacsa1, Tamás G Szabó3, Rene Goliath2, Molebogeng X Rangaka2, Ferenc Hudecz4, Robert J Wilkinson5, Katalin A Wilkinson6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Blood-based Interferon-Gamma Release Assays (IGRA) identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) sensitisation with increased specificity, but sensitivity remains impaired in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected persons. The QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test contains peptide 38-55 of Rv2654c, based on data indicating differential recognition between tuberculosis patients and BCG vaccinated controls in Europe. We aimed to fine map the T cell response to Rv2654c with the view of improving sensitivity.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; Interferon-Gamma Release Assays (IGRA); Peptide epitope; QuantiFERON assay; Rv2654c; Tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26632326 PMCID: PMC4747975 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.10.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect ISSN: 0163-4453 Impact factor: 6.072
Sequence and characteristics of peptides used in this study.
| Code | Sequence | Mav | Mav | Rt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| p1-20 | MSGHALAARTLLAAADELVG | 1966.3 | 1966.1 | 31.7 |
| p11-30 | LLAAADELVGGPPVEASAAA | 1821.1 | 1821.0 | 25.8 |
| p21-40 | GPPVEASAAALAGDAAGAWR | 1837.0 | 1837.0 | 27.5 |
| p31-50 | LAGDAAGAWRTAAVELARAL | 1982.3 | 1982.1 | 34.4 |
| p41-60 | TAAVELARALVRAVAESHGV | 2019.3 | 2019.2 | 33.3 |
| p51-70 | VRAVAESHGVAAVLFAATAA | 1910.2 | 1909.8 | 32.0 |
| p61-81 | AAVLFAATAAAAAAVDRGDPP | 1925.2 | 1925.1 | 30.5 |
| p38-55 | AWRTAAVELARALVRAVA | 1922.1 | 1922.2 | 41.5 |
| p51-65 | VRAVAESHGVAAVLF | 1523.8 | 1523.8 | 28.4 |
| p55-70 | AESHGVAAVLFAATAA | 1483.8 | 1483.8 | 30.0 |
| p61-75 | AAVLFAATAAAAAAV | 1286.7 | 1286.8 | 16.5 |
| p66-81 | AATAAAAAAVDRGDPP | 1422.7 | 1422.8 | 16.6 |
Average molecular mass measured by a Bruker Esquire 3000 + electrospray mass spectrometer.
Retention time on an analytical RP-HPLC using an Eurospher-100, C-18, 5 μm, 250 × 4 mm column; gradient: 5% B, 5 min; 5–60% B, 35 min.
Gradient: 5% B, 5 min; 5–90% B, 45 min.
Phenomenex Jupiter C-4, 5 μm, 250 × 4 mm column, gradient: 5% B, 5 min; 5–70% B, 35 min.
Figure 1Identification of highly immunogenic regions by MHC-binding predictions. The median value of the consensus percentile rank scores of binding to supertype-defining HLA II alleles was obtained from predictions by the IEDB webservice, for each 15-mer peptides. Since the smaller consensus percentile rank a peptide has, the better binding is expected, percentile rank values were converted to binding scores by subtraction of the value from 100. The 100 minus median rank values are shown for the top scoring 20% (15 peptides) as a function of starting residues.
Recognition of single peptides and Rv2654c peptide pool by individuals with LTBI and active TB.
| LTBI | Active | Combined | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. pos. resp. | Sensitivity % (95% CI) | Median SFC/106 (IQR) | No. pos. resp. | Sensitivity % (95% CI) | Median SFC/106 (IQR) | No. pos. resp. | Sensitivity % (95% CI) | Median SFC/106 (IQR) | |
| p1-20 | 6/24 | 25 (9.8–46.7) | 5 (0–19) | 2/10 | 20 (2.5–55.6) | 3 (0–15) | 8/34 | 24 (10.8–41.2) | 4 (0–17) |
| p11-30 | 1/24 | 4 (0.1–21.1) | 0 (0–8) | 1/10 | 10 (0.3–44.5) | 2 (0–6) | 2/34 | 6 (0.7–19.7) | 0 (0–8) |
| p21-40 | 4/24 | 17 (4.7–37.4) | 4 (0–10) | 2/10 | 20 (2.5–55.6) | 9 (0–28) | 6/34 | 18 (6.8–34.5) | 4 (0–11) |
| p31-50 | 6/24 | 25 (9.8–46.7) | 6 (0–18) | 2/10 | 20 (2.5–55.6) | 9 | 8/34 | 24 (10.8–41.2) | 7 (0–14) |
| p41-60 | 4/24 | 17 (4.7–37.4) | 4 (0–8) | 1/10 | 10 (0.3–44.5) | 2 (0–9) | 5/34 | 15 (5.0–31.1) | 4 (0–8) |
| p51-70 | 7/24 | 29 (12.6–51.1) | 4 (0–23) | 3/10 | 30 (6.7–65.3) | 9 (0–26) | 10/34 | 29 (15.1–47.5) | 4 (0–21) |
| p61-81 | 7/24 | 29 (12.6–51.1) | 8 (0–20) | 5/10 | 50 (18.7–81.3) | 18 (5–46) | 12/34 | 35 (19.8–53.5) | 10 (0–24) |
| Rv2654c pool | 7/24 | 29 (12.6–51.1) | 6 (0–35) | 4/10 | 40 (12.2–73.8) | 10 | 11/34 | 32 (17.4–50.5) | 8 (0–24) |
| ESAT-6/CFP-10 | 24/24 | 100 (85.8–100) | 240 (82–419) | 8/10 | 80 (44.4–97.5) | 109 (37–163) | 32/34 | 94 (80.3–99.3) | 156 (61–362) |
PBMC of either LTBI (n = 24) or active TB patients (n = 10) were in vitro stimulated with 20-mer overlapping peptides spanning the entire sequence of Rv2654c protein using the ELISpot assay. The number of spot forming cells per million PBMC (SFC/106) are presented and compared to ESAT-6/CFP-10 response. The cut-off for positive response was 20 SFC/106.
Number of positive responders/number tested.
Sensitivity was calculated as a ratio of the number of true positive responders over the number of false negative plus true positive responders.
Median spot number and interquartile range.
Figure 2Detailed analysis of the . The number of spot forming cells per million PBMC (SFC/106) are presented from n = 19 MTB sensitized individuals. The cut-off for positive response was 20 SFC/106 above nil (dotted line). Significance was calculated using Mann–Whitney U test. **p < 0.005. Black lines represent the median SFC/106 values on both panels.
Figure 3Population tailored epitope prediction. The portion of the population able to present a 15-mer peptide was estimated based on simulations combining MHC binding scores of the IEDB epitope prediction tool and HLA serotype frequencies described in the Xhosa population. The 5 best scoring peptides for a given combination of HLA alleles were regarded as binders (binding to an APC), with a fair chance for antigen presentation. The number of people likely to have a given combination of HLA alleles was estimated using the Hardy–Weinberg equation. Percentage of the whole population, expected to present a given peptide is given for each possible starting position of 15-mers derived from the Rv2654 protein. Panel (A) represents the percentage of the Xhosa population, expected to present 15-mer peptides, based on both HLA-DR and HLA-DQ predictions of the IEDB tool. On panel (B), percentage of Xhosa population based only on HLA-DR prediction is presented, while on panel (C), percentage of the Danish population, based on HLA-DR predictions is represented.
Recognition and boosting effect of p51-65 in the HIV negative cohort.
| QFT performance | QFTB performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Number tested | 55 | 55 |
| Median IU/ml (IQR) | 1.83 (0.32–6.90) | 2.83 (0.32–11.54) |
| Comparison of median IU/ml response | ** ( | |
| No. of positive responders | 40 | 41 |
| Responders % | 73 | 75 |
| Sensitivity % (95% CI) | 95 (83.8–99.4) | 98 (87.1–99.9) |
Blood samples of 55 HIV uninfected participant were assayed in commercially available QFT and p51-65 peptide boosted QFT (QFTB). The cut-off for positive recognition was 0.35 IU/ml above nil.
Median IU/ml value in QFT or QFTB assay and interquartile range.
Significance was calculated using Wilcoxon matched pairs test. **p < 0.01.
Number of positive responders/number tested.
Percentage of responders out of all donors tested.
Sensitivity was calculated as a ratio of the number of true positive responders over the number of false negative plus true positive responders. False negativity was confirmed by ELISpot using ESAT-6/CFP-10 antigens. The difference in sensitivity statistically is not significant.
Recognition and boosting effect of p51-65 in the HIV infected cohort.
| Day 0 | 1 Month | 3 Months | 6 Months | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median IU/ml (IQR) | 1.17 (0.26–7.14) | 1.74 (0.09–11.63) | 0.57 (0.07–6.89) | 1.20 (0.10–4.53) |
| No. pos. resp. | 30 | 28 | 24 | 22 |
| Responders % | 68 | 68 | 57 | 56 |
| Sensitivity % (95% CI) | 97 (83.3–99.9) | 97 (82.2–99.9) | 80 (61.4–92.3) | 81 (61.9–93.7) |
| Median IU/ml (IQR) | 1.17 (0.05–6.11) | 1.16 (0.09–17.90) | 0.70 (0.15–5.78) | 1.19 (0.14–4.46) |
| No. pos. resp. | 28/44 | 27 | 27 | 25 |
| Responders % | 64 | 66 | 64 | 64 |
| Sensitivity % (95% CI) | 90 (74.3–98.0) | 93 (77.2–99.2) | 90 (73.5–97.9) | 93 (75.7–99.1) |
| Viral load Median (IQR) | 71,291 (38,855–2,27,729) | 316 (114–593) | 39 (39–77) | 39 (39–39) |
| CD4+ T cell number Median (IQR) | 197 (121–238) | 278 (185–340) | 298 (189–363) | 307 (247–399) |
HIV infected participants were sampled before the initiation of ART and 1, 3 and 6 months after the treatment. Blood samples were assayed in commercially available QFT and p51-65 peptide boosted QFT (QFTB). The cut-off for positive recognition was 0.35 IU/ml above nil.
Median IU/ml value in QFT or QFTB assay and interquartile range.
Number of positive responders/number tested.
Percentage of responders out of all donors tested.
Sensitivity was calculated as a ratio of the number of true positive responders over the number of false negative plus true positive responders. False negativity was defined for those who had at least one positive result before. There was a statistically non-significant trend of increasing sensitivity at 3 and 6 months for QFTB compared to QFT.