Literature DB >> 26632228

Effects of various chair-side surface treatment methods on dental restorative materials with respect to contact angles and surface roughness.

Candida R C Sturz1, Franz-Josef Faber, Martin Scheer, Daniel Rothamel, Jörg Neugebauer.   

Abstract

Available chair-side surface treatment methods may adversely affect prosthetic materials and promote plaque accumulation. This study investigated the effects of treatment procedures on three resin restorative materials, zirconium-dioxide and polyetheretherketone in terms of surface roughness and hydrophobicity. Treatments were grinding with silicon carbide paper or white Arkansas stone, blasting with prophylaxis powder and polishing with diamond paste. Surface roughness was assessed using confocal laser scanning. Hydrophobicity as measured by water contact angle was determined by computerized image analysis using the sessile drop technique. All of the specific surface treatments performed led to significant changes in contact angle values and surface roughness (Ra) values. Median contact angle values ranged from 51.6° to 114°. Ra values ranged from 0.008 µm to 2.917 µm. Air-polishing as well as other polishing procedures increased surface roughness values in all materials except zirconium dioxide. Polyetheretherketone displayed greatest change in contact angle values after air-polishing treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26632228     DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater J        ISSN: 0287-4547            Impact factor:   2.102


  7 in total

1.  Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment.

Authors:  Thomas Strasser; Verena Preis; Michael Behr; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Surface properties of dental zirconia ceramics affected by ultrasonic scaling and low-temperature degradation.

Authors:  Kosuke Nakazawa; Keisuke Nakamura; Akio Harada; Midori Shirato; Ryoichi Inagaki; Ulf Örtengren; Taro Kanno; Yoshimi Niwano; Hiroshi Egusa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Carbon nanotube incorporation in PMMA to prevent microbial adhesion.

Authors:  Kyoung-Im Kim; Dong-Ae Kim; Kapil D Patel; Ueon Sang Shin; Hae-Won Kim; Jung-Hwan Lee; Hae-Hyoung Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Influence of the Physical Inclusion of ZrO2/TiO2 Nanoparticles on Physical, Mechanical, and Morphological Characteristics of PMMA-Based Interim Restorative Material.

Authors:  Ali Alrahlah; Rawaiz Khan; Fahim Vohra; Ibrahim M Alqahtani; Adel A Alruhaymi; Sajjad Haider; Abdel-Basit Al-Odayni; Waseem Sharaf Saeed; H C Ananda Murthy; Leonel S Bautista
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Evaluation of the Surface Characteristics of Dental CAD/CAM Materials after Different Surface Treatments.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papadopoulos; Kimon Pahinis; Kyriaki Saltidou; Dimitrios Dionysopoulos; Effrosyni Tsitrou
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  The Effect of Different Cleaning Protocols of Polymer-Based Prosthetic Materials on the Behavior of Human Gingival Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Vygandas Rutkunas; Rokas Borusevicius; Dominyka Liaudanskaite; Urte Jasinskyte; Saulius Drukteinis; Virginija Bukelskiene; Eitan Mijiritsky
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites.

Authors:  Hanan A N Soliman; Naglaa Rizk Elkholany; Hamdi H Hamama; Fatma M El-Sharkawy; Salah H Mahmoud; John C Comisi
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-10-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.